File: hq720.jpg (61.5 KB)
(�/�c�J�O4 �immeptdeskbi3usbroldfagu route?#��e�W�j�)~������)i}/�xɌk�h�iN#Uˉ�Y*�(�����;��f�V�Cbam%⭶U`|�5�G.a5ׂ$ȫIb}�L�G
Showing all 6 replies.
>>
>>
>>
>>1028998
if the firm uses autocad, avoid them.
if the consultants don't use revit, avoid them.
if you're going to be a drafter, make and use a revit template.
if you're going to be a bim manager, model everything in-house.
if you're going to be a architect, you don't need any of this shit.
>>
File: 1650815689925.jpg (194.1 KB)
>>1029014
>if the firm uses autocad, avoid them
why? i mean revit uses autocad files for reference base, yes?
>if the consultants don't use revit, avoid them.
yes i understand this
>if you're going to be a drafter, make and use a revit template.
i woulr rather be in bim
>if you're going to be a bim manager, model everything in-house.
ok, i will
>if you're going to be a architect, you don't need any of this shit.
no architect, even though i love brutalism i dont want to be an achitect.
also have an idea to probably offer digital twins in an either vr app in unity for interiors or viz app in unreal. but dont know if its a good idea and too much work.
>>
>>
>>1029026
>why? i mean revit uses autocad files for reference base, yes?
Nope. If the building and site are modeled, you won't need autocad at all.
I will admit that you may have to export .DWG's for clients or consultants, and that I have 'traced' autocad files to make revit families, but autocad should really be used as a back up for drawing very simple plans and not for any complex project that will be subject to changes.
Any project that requires quantification, exact site data, and cataloguing needs BIM. revit, despite it's clunkiness and being a spawn of autodesk, is probably the way to go. I don;t know enough about archicad
>>1029031
Trace paper.