>>9188342 To any anon interested in some decent gens, I recommend Darkroast175696 on Civitai if they like bimbo-ish office ladies, superheroes or/and muscle mommies.
>>9188428 Oh, and I forgot to mention there's some breast expansion and light transformation content, as well as a negligible FxF and FxM petting action, and maybe a titjob or two.
>>9188426 >This might be a shot in the dark, but is the Anon who made those kissing videos still here? The ones from old movies, specifically Haven't been for a while, but I have checked in for the moment.
>>9189404 >darkroast please W-what? Jokes aside, there simply isn't that much AI OL content in general (that I know of), so even though it may seem like I'm shilling his stuff, I'm just satisfying my own hunger for big titties in blouses and pencil skirts.
>>9189531 Just as I've finished writing this posted, I went on Civitai and typed in "office" and "huge breasts" to see just what I'll find. Surprisingly, there's a lot more OL stuff than I had expected. Not a lot of it is at Darkroast's level of quality, but I'd like to leave it here for posterity anyways.
Seems like it's generally pretty quiet. The subject matter there is of limited appeal to me, but I do like some of the results are regards motion, camerawork, e.g., >>9189589 . What method was used? It doesn't strike me as WAN, but perhaps it's just a better usage of it than I expect.
>>9190258 >What method was used? You'll have to ask tordabled156 on Civitai, cause there's nothing written in his posts that indicates what method is he using.
>>9190397 >post the one with audio She's speaking Spanish, so I'm not sure if it'll mean anything to you.
>>9188342 I never gave AI slop a fair chance but now it looks like it's getting better and better and I wish I learned how to gen stuff. Do you need to have the greatest GPU/CPU to gen stuff this good or any high-mid tier one can do?
>>9192501 >I am a gastroenterologist, my interest is purely professional I assure you. Phew, glad to hear that! >What model is that by the way? Apparently, it's Wan Video 2.2
Does anyone here have any idea? I've seen a spate of videos on Deviantart lately where they see4m intensely high quality/high fidelity, like, they HAVE to be newer models like Seedance 2.0 or similar from the look and sound of them, but with full nudity, fetishes, and sex. And everything I've been able to find literally everywhere, as well as my own tries from several places, seems to indicate this is impossible.
What services and or models are being used to generate these? It can't be home brewed, local stuff, because there is nothing good enough, even VAGUELY good enough available to get the level of some of what I have seen. And several of these accounts were generating only much lower quality slop until recently, also making me convinced its somehow one of the most recent models.
No, despite how good they look, they're definitely AI,it's not like that's not obvious. Plus, the women are often huge in size with impossible body tyoes.
>>9194475 >jamboy >face-sitting a pajeet Doesn't that bitch know that doing that is unsanitary? She doesn't know where that pajeet has been, nor whether or not he's caught something by bathing in the Ganges.
>>9194479 She's a real executive being sued by a Nepalese (partly Indian adjacent) subordinate banker employee at JPMorgan NYC for rape and blackmail. I don't care who she fucks as her sex slaves, she can fuck dogs for all I care. Her hotness + alleged kinkiness and power abuse is enough for me to worship online
>>9194519 The guy made that shit up cause he got fired, which is very funny. That doesn't change the fact the scenario is hot and it makes me want to worship her.
>>9196650 Well obviously it’s AI due to it being the game Resident Evil Requiem and the Leon part exploring the mental institution, which this lady approaches in a more clumsy manner and has a bloody or tear streaked face while also smiling constantly and which is a neat detail that the lady only does a thing when you play as Leon which she doesn’t do for Grace is she does a little hand heart gesture, and here it’s basically walking confidently without dancing and another clear observation is the face
well I have some good ltx-2.3 i2v distilled plus ltx23_nsfw_helper_multi_concept_lora_v1.safetensors videos but catbox.moe is down and you can't post .mp4 with audio here. Oh well. 48 GB VRAM is enough for 30 seconds of 1280x720 distilled ltx-2.3 i2v/
I'm making a porn game with realistic AI. I wish mine could always be consistently super realistic like most of the ones one here plus on here im seeing some stuff idk how to do. but i guess its hard for me because im trying to keep consistent characters for the game and put them in certain situations and theyre totally fake while the ones on here are probably some are real pictures that just got turned into video.
>>9191487 Different anon but a 4080. Messed about with website when it outshone local but now censoring's gone to the moon and much more limited so looking to try it out. Not sure what the landscape is now at all
Someone give me three republican whores to edit onto three other chicks made by this guy (>>9203452) and I'll combine the two pics and animate them to shake their tits.
>>9203884 Are you retarded? I asked for "three republican whores" and got recommended Kamala and two other democrat whores I already fucking used. Stop replying to me.
>>9188342 hey, just started using Wan 2.2 A14b, both I2V and T2V, its practically perfect at doing regular people with only 512 x 512 pixels, however all my anime based images are coming out with pixilated edges at the same resolution, i image because the model itself is more based off of real footage, im using a dual pipeline with Comfyui, tried quite a few things like lora's and such, can anyone give me a nudge in the right direction? i see a tonne of anime style Videos made in wan 2.2 and they dont have this issue
>>9205164 everyones moving on to LTX faster than wan2.2 better quality than wan2.2 lengths over 5 seconds can nudify videos. easy audio and lip sync just from prompting "she says" I don't do anime so i cant answer that for you though.
>>9205286 If you run into errors, it can be old nodes you installed a long time ago like me. SMZnodes that i had completely forgotten about was causing errors in generation as it hijacks how samplers are used.
>>9205268 >>9205269 i tried LTx 2 and while it was way quicker the anime quality was abysmal, way worse than Wan2.2, you have a workflow for I2V that is good? i used the generic workflow on ComfyUi and yea, really bad results
>>9205315 didnt see your post, checking it out but holy crap its a little convoluted, i only started using comfyui 3 days ago, got 38 errors so installing all the missing node packs, i only really wanna do image to video can you give me some pointers?
>>9205350 i think its a little advanced for me to start with since im fairly new, im gonna try the generic LTX 2.3 image to video workflow which you can find on the browse templates section and see how it goes with that, unless you know of a better workflow thats just image to video, the last one i got of these which i think was for an earlier version of LTX was pretty bad
>>9205351 wait then what is a good anime video model, i see a tonne on CivitAI, they all claim to be Wan 2.2 though and i know that had some major issues with anime characters
>>9205353 Wan2.1 — currently one of the best open source video models, has anime-friendly output and good motion HunyuanVideo — also strong, more stylistically flexible AnimateDiff with anime-tuned checkpoints — older but lots of community LoRAs specifically for anime styles Mochi — decent for stylized content
I'm praying that hentai studios will incorporate some ai into their workflow soon. Queen bee has some great art with shit animation. If they just reworked 2 minutes of sex scenes per video, quality would go up by like 60%, one guy could probably do it in 1-2 days
>>9205956 I do wonder why more AI animation of well-drawn stills hasn't become more widespread. Not just pro level but fan level. Like i know AI animation is the newest invention, and has either way longer process time or a more intensive computer need if you want it fast. But the qualitative improvement of motion seems worth it.
The other thing I saw once on /gif/ was people taking existing porn, either video or shitty CG animation, and overlaying porn loras over the top to change the actress and improve the style.
Last time I saw anyone messing around with that was like 2 years ago and even then it seemed promising if uncanny, I'd assume the technology should have come a long way since then.
>>9206071 not to diss the TF but man this with just breast growth and her falling over from the weight would be great I haven't seen someone do that with AI yet I don't think
Wow, I just realized that /r/ is down. Has it been removed because of that hit piece by wired? https://www.wired.com/story/4chans-misogynist-wizards-are-nudifying-women-by-request/
>>9205956 I just played around with seedance, no know how, no loras or character models, just start and end frame. The original is on the left. They might be scamming us with ai animation already
>>9206522 >Should I? I don't know if posting AI content on a public profile using Lorna's likeness can get you into trouble, so I'd first check with whatever site you might wanna upload your stuff to.
>>9208076 so an "ADULT CARTOON CHARACTER" that is "MADE FOR ADULTS" and also a parody of a "CARTOON" would be removed because of the Quality of the Photo? 2D is fine AND 3D is fine, but not if the 3D has a quality close to real life, despite being about cartoons, being for adults, and being on topic. this board is for ADULT CARTOONS, what does that mean? it means cartoons made for adults, turned into adults, adultified, etc. you change the cartoon to make it adult, completely fine to make "REAL" porn.
they need to change the board name to "CARTOON ADULTS" since it doesn't even matter if they are from an actual cartoon, just that it is 2D or shit quality 3D
>>9208148 I hate to break this to you, but it's not my thread. and im not going to kowtow to a system that thinks i have to be nice to it.
>my point your head
the name ADULT CARTOONS implies a category inclusive of all adult cartoon styles, then they exclude adult cartoons that are too realistic in style. an easier fix to make new and old better understand what the baords purpose is, is to change the name to represent better what it contains : CARTOON ADULTS
i just want the rules to make sense, but i see im dealing with vitriol incarnate.
>>9208210 >I cant read i was just trying to help big dog, sorry you dont understand my post. honestly that's my fault, i guess i should be talking to someone who actually matters.
If the guy that animated this older version of this pic is here, I humbly you request this "newer" version. https://x.com/SpookieShadeArt/status/2061991240665583824