Thread #18680529
based or nased?
13 RepliesView Thread
>>
File: sluurp.jpg (75.4 KB)
75.4 KB JPG
>>18680529
hhnngggf
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>18680637
huh. weird. a lot of things that seem to be catching on in other places just haven't caught on here. no braless women. no women with visibly unshaven legs and armpits. no men in short shorts. it's still women wearing bras, women with smooth legs and armpits, and men in knee-length or longer shorts. and it's been this way for more than a decade here and hasn't changed
>>
>>18680676
Nta but yeah you should definitely take things with a grain of salt. Just because something is happening doesn't mean that everyone is gonna suddenly drop their current style just to fit in with what's happening. The vast majority of people already figured out what they like long ago and aren't gonna change it just for trends. I don't really see any of those things you described either. They're not so absurdly rare to be considered blasphemous like they were in the past but where I live for example almost all women still wear bras, every woman I personally know wears a bra, and the few braless women I see are usually just random women in the middle of crowds. No one judges them for being braless but they're still in the very small minority.
>>
>>
>>18680529
>tranny bait to get anons banned
>>
>>
>>18680529
that top is mostly fine but she should have worn a normal bra. That knit thing looks ridiculous. I assume it is probably integrated with the rest of the top but it looks like she layered two knits that are the same material and colors and it looks tacky as hell