DOA
And if not, then SCOTUS will do its job.

>"Parents Decide" act
>only thing it does is remove the parent's ability to decide whether they want to enable parental controls or not

>>108617863
What's an operating system provider?
>>108617882
If a bill has a name, you can be sure that it does the opposite.

>Parents Decide
>Not a single parent asked for this
>Only Mark Zuckerberg

>>108617888

> (5) Operating system provider
> The term "operating system provider" means a person that develops, licenses, or controls the operating system on a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device.

>>108617874
>surely this Israeli owned government will fail to do something Israel wants

File: OIP.jpg (62.1 KB)

62.1 KB JPG

Nepal. Minecraft.

>>108617863
Why now all of a sudden?
I mean, they've wanted this kind of dystopian shit since forever, but what makes now agood time to try?

>>108617947
2030 is nearing, they want their global gulag with carbon scores and all that

>>108617908
so a person who develops the operating system on a computer is required to verify the age of any user of an operating system? how do they do that? who do they know is a user of an operating system and who isn't?
am i an operating system provider if i control the operating system on my own computer? am i breaking the law if i don't verify my own age?

File: 1754950312172146.png (71.3 KB)

71.3 KB PNG

>>108617947
Epstein files, Agenda 2030

I don’t feel too good

>parents decide
parents dont give a shit about what OS their kids use

File: Apple Forces British iPhone Users To Prove Age With ID Or Lose Unrestricted Internet Access ZeroHedge.png (588.7 KB)

588.7 KB PNG

>>108617874
I wouldn't be so sure. Brazil's landmark Age Verification Bill the “Adultization Bill” or “Digital ECA (Child and Adolescent Statute) was introduced in 2022 and was enrolled in March of 2026. It was used as a foundation of California's Bill which was enrolled 20/13/25 and will go in effect in January 2027.The UK passed a similar bill. See pic related.

>>108617960
Kek, I was just thinking the same thing.
By that wording, I am an operating system provider because of one frankenfucked distro on an ancient shitbox.

>>108618045
>corrupt shithole without free speech does terrible things
>therefore the country with the strongest free speech laws in the world will force it on its people
This does not follow.

>>108617947
They don't have much time

>>108618082
if your country had covid vaccines it's already fully under communist control
don't worry we will all eat bugs, together. truly equitable

>>108617882
USA lawmaking in a shellnut.

>>108617960
> so a person who develops the operating system on a computer is required to verify the age of any user of an operating system?
Yes.

> how do they do that? who do they know is a user of an operating system and who isn't?
An operating system provider, with respect to any operating system of such provider, shall carry out the following: (1) Require any user of the operating system to provide the date of birth of the user in order to— (A) set up an account on the operating system; and (B) use the operating system. (2) If the relevant user of the operating system is under 18 years of age, require a parent or legal guardian of the user to verify the date of birth of the user. (3) Develop a system to allow an app developer to access any information as is necessary, collected by the operating system to carry out this section and any regulation promulgated under this section, to verify the date of birth of a user of an app of the app developer.
> am i an operating system provider if i control the operating system on my own computer?
Judging by the wording of the definition of “Operating system provider”, yes as you are the person controlling the operating system on the computer, mobile device or general purpose computing device.

> am i breaking the law if i don't verify my own age?
Yes. (c) Enforcement by Commission (1) Unfair or deceptive acts or practices— A violation of this section or a regulation promulgated under this section shall be treated as a violation of a regulation under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B)) regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices.

You could write a bill to legalize raping and eating babies and the average American parent would support it if you called it the "Save The Children For Freedom Act".

>>108618138
Colonial mongrels are dumb as the rocks they bang together. They believe whatever they are told if the money power telling them has the right brand.

File: CA AB1043 2025-2026 Regular Session Enrolled LegiScan.png (670.8 KB)

670.8 KB PNG

>>108618082
Did you not read the part where Californina enrolled a similar bill? IIRC 2 other states followed suit about a month after CA. pic related

>>108618161
These haven't gone through the courts yet, and there's a VERY high chance they don't survive.

>>108618177
Just like SESTA-FOSTA right?

File: Age Verification EU vs US.png (27.1 KB)

27.1 KB PNG

Yeah but at least the eurocucks have it wor-ACK!

>>108618197
That one wasn't great, but ended up being a huge nothingburger. As far as I can tell, only one person has ever been convicted of violating it. Prostitution is illegal anyways (we don't talk about NV), and the Supreme Court has long exempted obscenity from the first amendment, so they can get away with banning talking about organizing it. Merely using a computer isn't illegal, however. These new laws are much broader in scope and are much more likely to get struck down.

>>108618252
>implying the EU won't pass one of these too
Zero-knowledge proofs are just a nerd trap anyways.

>>108618177
The bill surviving is not relevant to the argument, I recognize that there are checks and balances in place. The fact that CA passed legislation based on a bill passed by " [a] corrupt shithole without free speech..." proves “… the country with the strongest free speech laws in the world will force it on its people”.

>>108618284
Though keep in mind Brazil's law is way worse than California's.

>>108617947
Unchecked antisemitism; normalfags went a little too far with their antisemitism on their tiktoks lol

That was pretty retarded of them to do so. Why the hell would you openly criticize Jews within a satellite state managed by them?

>>108617863
Reminder that all of this is being pushed by the heritage foundation. They absolutely hate the fact children can use the internet to educate themselves

>>108618126
>If the relevant user of the operating system is under 18 years of age, require a parent or legal guardian of the user to verify the date of birth of the user
this is the most retarded law ever. just pants on head retarded.

>>108617947
Companies like Meta are trying to avoid liability so they are passing the responsibility of managing kids on social media down to everyone else instead.

Well fuck. Guess this is it for not only 4chan but the entire internet as well. My best advice to everyone is to download whatever you can because things wont be the same after this. Fuck globohomo and fuck the zionists.

It's absolutely insane to me that they're actually trying to pass a law that says you can't use a computer unless it has a connection to the internet and can contact the government. That's what this after all. How does your OS verify your age without verifying your identity? How does your OS verify your identity without connecting to a government system?
You're just bricked if the damn thing can't get online and call home when you try to login?
It's absolutely insane.

I increasingly feel like americans are just projecting when they insult other countries

>>108618869
They're not. They are genuinely delusional and think their country has no inherent flaws.

>>108617874
uhhh anon have you seen scotus or any of their rulings in the past few years?

>>108617874
lmfao

How the fuck is this enforceable

>>108617863
>Any other general purpose computing device
It was nice knowing what freedom meant, anons. See you on the other side.

guys this is enforceable

"looks at china and north korea"

yep slowly but surely they will keep implmenting rules until you bend the knee and have little to no more alternatives

>>108617874
>SCOTUS will do its job.
Can I live in your fantasy world?

>>108618252
Yeah except the kikes force you to use a google integrity enforced or apple enforced cuck phone.

>>108617894
The zucc and all AI companies are pushing for this they need to authenticate every user on the internet to know they can feed their data and interactions to skynet.
Reddit is utterly poisoned by AI spam now they can't confidently use it as a data source anymore and they hate it.

How is this enforceable for random linux distributions hosted one zimbabwe or whatever? away from US jurisdiction

>>108618679
The fact that no one is boycotting Meta's platforms, or even aware of the bill in the first place, affirms my belief that Americans are grade-A niggercattle.

>>108618869
Maybe so, but the people loudly hating on America 24/7 are also projecting from their own shitholes. The only functional first-world societies left on Earth, as far as I can tell, are Japan and Singapore. They're the only people with any room to talk. The rest of us are all on the same shitty boat.

>>108619061
>Japan and Singapore
Both of which already have stricter censorship laws than the US.

>>108617874
okay but that's not what israel wants so... the goyim can't have bad thoughts about the jews.

>>108618946
In the same way Ofcom has been enforcing their UK laws on US based companies. Most of the companies in the US capitulated to the UK. 4chan didn't and is being fined per day since the law was enacted. If 4chan continues to ignore them, the UK stated they are preparing to block access to 4chan in the UK. It seems like there will be a handshaking process between hardware (the OS) and the software (apps and programs) if they are connected to the internet. So even if you use a non-compliant OS, your access to sites/apps would be limited or out right restricted to those to do not check for age verification. See >>108618045

>>108618915
>they
Are mortal.

>>108619130
thing here is that during the totalitarian transition they need legalities setup with 100% certainty via all plebs having their identity tied to any criticism plebs might post on the internets

no such thing as anonymity on the internet, however without having 100% paper trail (loysense et al) that confirms it is you who posted 'i aint getting vaxed go fuck yourself' they could potentially have trouble screwing you over

all that is happening right now is what "think tank" retards have been shitting out for many, many, decades

>>108619061
>I am a mutt who watched anime and here are all the countries I know

File: 1775079652234659.gif (353.9 KB)

353.9 KB GIF

>>108618045
iTODDLERS BTFO

>>108620010
kek