>>108618674
100% mobile users

Verizon basically broke their residential IPv6 hardware for their new fiber network upgrade (NGPON2).

So verizon at least will keep IPv4 for awhile longer, though they own millions of IPv4 addressess, so it's not a HUGE deal for them (yet).

File: file.png (122.1 KB)

122.1 KB PNG

IPv8 when

File: file.png (129.4 KB)

129.4 KB PNG

Thanks, Obama.

>>108618674
I still don't have ipv6.

>>108618674
Two more decades?

>>108618708
what does have to do with it? your little cash for clunkers pet theory?

>>108618751
Que

>check
>actually have an IPv6 prefix now
>probably one of the machines that was responsible for raising it above 50%
Holy.... Fucking....... Based...........

>>108618770
Based? based on what?

>>108618685
this
you cant even disable ipv6 on phones

>>108618674
can we see per country

>>108619078
Based on being based.

>>108618692
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thain-ipv8-00.html

soon

File: 1769924136203947.png (64.8 KB)

64.8 KB PNG

>>108618692
jej

>>108619370
No.

>>108618674
Just 30 more years before full adoption

File: 1746210861084503.png (61.5 KB)

61.5 KB PNG

>>108618692
I had ipv6 for more than a decade if I recall correctly, still paying peanuts.

>>108619764
skin color?

>>108619414
I doubt "full" adoption will ever happen in our lifetimes if you mean the full retirement of IPv4.

>>108618674
idgi why isnt is 100% ipv6
what's the advantage of using ipv4 in 2026?

>>108619800
>>what's the advantage of using ipv4 in 2026?
99.9% of the internet still uses IPv4, and not all of them use IPv6.

So if you had to pick one over the other, IPv4 is the only sane option.


If you just need to access major web services it shouldnt be a problem if you're on IPv6 only, but much of the wider internet is still IPv4.

It's fairly easy to get by without IPv6 in 2026, it would be a pain in the ass to deal without IPv4.

Ipv6ers tongue my anus

>>108619768
white but I'm a brotha deep in my heart, you feel me?

>>108619886
yeah u seem like a nigger for sure

>>108619894
want to check my mixtape?

>>108619901
ye

>>108619156
You can actually (unless your carrier is exclusively IPv6 only like TMobile then you probably have to use it?). Just go in the APN settings and make sure IPv6 is off.

File: 1773160900733258.png (126.9 KB)

126.9 KB PNG

>>108619925

So, anyone with IPv4 disabled?

File: 1745018896169174.png (130.5 KB)

130.5 KB PNG

>>108619951
It's just a toggle in my router.

>>108619951
I think Windows might be the only OS that even lets you do that.

Linux is working towards that but they're not there yet. Too much code assumes "Inet == IPv4" and they have to untangle that to get it to the point that you can build a kernel with no IPv4 at all.

I have Jool doing NAT64 on my OpenWRT router though and send DHCP option 108 to indicate devices should work in an IPv6-mostly fashion if they support it.
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-link-v6ops-6mops-01.html

The next release of NetworkManager will support bringing up CLAT if configured to do so (Fedora is testing this) but for now it's just Android and iOS devices that work without IPv4 on my network.

I think Windows 11 is getting a CLAT too but I haven't tested that yet.

>>108618674
How many of those are from india or china?

>>108619402
I got the same result and don't care. I could turn it on but I just don't care.

File: Chinks_and_Street_Shitters_IPv6_Adoption.jpg (418.3 KB)

418.3 KB JPG

>>108620016
You can view the individual countries stats:
https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption

US is 54.61% respectively.

>>108608317

File: 1762592078064254.png (243 KB)

243 KB PNG

ezpz lemon squeezy

>>108619951
you can't post on this site with it off

>run ipv6 test on windows
>doesnt work
>reboot into linux
>works
dunno bros

>>108620154
You probably have it disabled in your adapter settings, cocksnot.

>>108620187
i dont you retard assumer, even pulling a global address

>>108620154
Your router might not be sending router advertisements quickly enough for it to enable it.

On my OpenWRT router I ended up needing to configure Uradvd (I'm not using Odhcpd or Dnsmasq because I wanted a simpler config) like this:

        option max_router_adv_interval '10'
        option min_router_adv_interval '3'
        option default_lifetime '1800'

Without that Android devices wouldn't connect to the IPv6 mostly network quickly enough and would display connection error messages. Maybe Windows is similarly picky? Linux on the other hand it doesn't care, it see's IPv6 10 minutes later than it should be (maybe that's how long your shit system took to boot anyway) and then configures it.

File: 1773494287024312.png (177.5 KB)

177.5 KB PNG

>>108620154
Damn Codex just identified the issue for me

anyone notice that IP blocks are becoming less common? seems like lots more people are being grouped under the same ipv4 address and online services don't want to ban everyone

>>108620240
That's CGNAT in action. If websites supported IPv6 properly then they'd be able to identify your IPv6 address and block you properly.

>>108620239
Of course it's Realtek, it's always Realtek. *facepalm*. Their drivers are garbage even on Linux too. How they manage to fuck up an entire Internet protocol with their shitty hardware offloads I'll never know.

This is probably some checksum issue, etc. I remember a lot of NICs having issues calculating that properly, etc, in the past and it would break stuff with the offloading.

>>108619966
(Me again):
If you can't wait for NetworkManager I just noticed clatd-git is in the AUR:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clatd-git

I built a Podman container for it and it works. The NetworkManager version will probably more performant though because it uses BPF.

>>108618674
this is good, it makes it a lot harder for people to get doxed

>>108620317
It's the exact opposite, you nimrod.

File: 1750809367748658.jpg (335.5 KB)

335.5 KB JPG

https://github.com/anniemaybytes/chihaya
The only torrent tracker I use doesn't support IPv6, neither does Hentai@Home

>>108620240
>anyone notice that IP blocks are becoming less common?
goood
fuck spur.us and I worship CGNAT
I use resi proxies everywhere I go and I noticed a lot less blocks as well. It seems social media websites are too scared to fight against resi proxies now

>>108620317
If someone finds your IP they could still feasibly scan your entire /56 range. It's just tedious and time consuming.
>>108620324
Privacy addressing is literally built into the protocol and if that's not enough then you can NAT6 to a ULA so all devices on your network appear to be behind the one same address that's on the router like what you got with NAT on IPv4 (but this breaks the end-to-end principle of IPv6 and will make purists cry)

>>108620328
Add http://tracker.ipv6tracker.org:80/announce to the trackers in QBittorrent.

>>108619951
I used to do it but u cannot post on 4chan, only download images. Most of the internet still works.
Game servers don't work.

>>108620342
Just scan 2^72 adresess, oh btw the OS cycles trough them constantly, oh by tomorrow I'm on another set of 2^72 adresess.

>>108620257
>>108620240
I have the option to leave my CGNAT with a toggle to get a random public ipb4 adress and I always take it because it's better for gaming ping and overall jitter, can't trust no chink shit router that's overworked on their end.

15y to get to 50% coverage? And that's the low hanging fruit..

Next 50% of remaining devices (to get to 75% coverage) will take another 15y.
Add another 15y to get to 87,5..

>>108620482
IPv6 would be better again if game servers supported it because it's end-to-end with no NAT in the middle, but they never do because game devs are retards that can't into networking

>>108620490
And your bank and insurance companies software is probably still running on top of Fortran.

This stuff takes time.

IPv6 is great for getting static IP for personal use. Although mobile carriers in my cunt don't support IPv6 and even on desktop I have IPv6 connectivity issues with some sites.

>>108619156
>you cant even disable ipv6 on phones
It's not about what you can disable or enable on your device. It's about what your network provider is willing to give you. If you disable IPv6 on an Android phone (which should be possible with enough privileges), it doesn't always mean that your provider will simply fall back to v4 - you might just have no connectivity at all.

>>108618674
>you VILL use the doxxable ipv6 address with unmodifiable prefix
>you VILL NOT BAN EVADE und YOU VILL NOT STAY ANONYMOUS O ALGO

>>108618685
this

>>108618674
Can't you use both at the same time?

>>108620655
You can have both enabled on the same physical network segment, but you can't literally use both at the same time since they're not compatible (I'm not talking about tunneling or other hacks).

>>108620586
>and even on desktop I have IPv6 connectivity issues with some sites.
Those are retards that "support" IPv6, they turned it on one day so they must do. No, they've never tested it.

>>108620641
You can't modify the IPv4 prefix either, retard. It belongs to your ISP. You get whatever they assign to you.

>>108620712
Ah makes sense

File: 1753214421870549.png (5.7 KB)

5.7 KB PNG

IPV6 is fantastic. I'm connected with sars.

It's a hell to set up UPnP with ipv6.

>>108621067
>UPnP
lol
>UPnP with ipv6
lmao, even

Is there a website that has well laid out info on the level of IPv6 support by ISP? Best I can find is Reddit anecdotes. Specifically I'm interested in UK mobile networks.

>>108621092
I agree that given your skin color you shouldn't use it. Not safe.

>>108621135
You shouldn't need to use UPNP with IPv6 in the first place. What the hell are you doing? Just open the ports in your firewall.

>>108621130
No idea. I know Three supports IPv6 on their network. They provide NAT64 too. If you're on Android you can even use Google's DNS64 DoT resolver just enter dns64.dns.google in the private DNS field.

>>108618674
>it's leveling out
Ha!

>>108621160
50% adoption's not bad. Effectively that means half of us have it and half of us (shitty frog posters in this thread that don't matter) don't.

>>108620257
This. When I had ipv6 turned on, my address would get banned half the time on some websites for blocking all their trackers and cookies, one which was notorious was the old rarbg before it went down. On ipv4 they didn't bother.

>>108618685
>>108619156
Must be nice, all the mobile carriers here settled on CG-NAT and there are no plans to move to IPv6.

>>108618674
What is bad about ipv6?

>>108620627
The full IPv6 is just the subnet, see >>108621688
They just do CGNAT, if you don't have iPv6 they will just put you on what is the equivalent of the prefix as iPv4
They are not breaking this anytime soon because there are still ancient devices which need support and don't have iPv6

>>108618674
I had ipv6 but my retarded isp disabled when i asked to allow port forwarding on ipv4.
They told me they couldn't do both at the same time.
What a bunch of retards.

>>108620524
Steam networking supports it

>>108621923
So, what if MAC addresses were permanent, unspoofable and identified your devices on the internet? Are you amazed?

>>108621955
probably not so much about the clients themselves (phones) being too old to support IPv6, but the fact that a fair bit of the Web is still inaccessible via pure v6.

>>108622250
Name one major OS that doesn't default to privacy addresses

File: 1763749269291776.jpg (52.8 KB)

52.8 KB JPG

>>108618674
>ipv6 disabled on router level
yep.. never happening.

IPV6 is completely fucking useless. It offers absolutely nothing over IPV4.

>>108622459
It offers MOAR addresses, which is kind of the point.

>>108622492
Name three reasons why that matters at all, besides being able to uniquely identify every end-device for tracking?

IPv6 is the most borked tech upgrade in history. The last os without ipv6 by default has EOL'd over a decade ago yet we barley reached 50%. We need to seriously start boycotting ISPs that don't support IPv6, basically shaming them as "not real internet" like we do for ISPs that still use copper lines.

>>108622459
bigger number better.
BIGGER. NUMBER. BETTER.