This post is off-topic.

>>108622107
No, I don't support russian psy-ops

>>108622114
Wikipedia is technology.

no I think I'll use libgen and anna's instead thanks

>>108622107
Wikipedia is a shadow of itself.
It used to insist that all articles be written in a neutral tone. But its editors have decided that's not necessary when it comes to shit that violates what they've decided is "normal science", among many things (really, anything that fits into their secular leftist worldviews)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craniosacral_therapy

>>108622348
(Just to be clear, I'm not saying I necessarily think CST is valid... but that is one of the least neutral "encyclopedia" entries I've ever read and, when I reached out to Wikipedia about it once, they just ho-hummed me... never seeing another dime from me again.)

>>108622174
what makes you think technology is a metric

File: 1776432433507.jpg (600.5 KB)

600.5 KB JPG

>>108622107
Kill.
Yourself.
Kike.

I almost did many years ago before I found out how corrupted they actually are

>>108622348
Based, pseudoscience niggers should be humiliated.

https://www.howdoeshomeopathywork.com/

>>108622389
Still no alternatives. Maybe (You) can start one?

>>108622392
I don't disagree in theory but an objective neutral-tone encyclopedia article isn't the place for that.

>>108622107
>>108622361
Reminder that Wikipedia is loaded and uses the annual 9 figures worth of donations to pay the founder even more than prior, with basically everything else being put into treasury bonds.

>>108622405
*supposedly neutral-tone, I mean

>>108622410
It is still free (as in free beer) and only asks (You) for a donation once in a while. You have no moral right to criticize it.

>donate to Myrient
>they went under anyway

Not even thanked.

>>108622423
bait used to be believable

i subscribe for 3 dollars a month but might raise it

>>108622424
they told you the rest would be used to pay hShop costs

>>108622107
Nope, I just use Grok or ChatGPT when writing up something or need historical info.

File: hemad.jpg (36.6 KB)

36.6 KB JPG

>>108622348
>CST is a pseudoscience and its practice has been characterized as quackery.[1][2] It is based on fundamental misconceptions about the anatomy and physiology of the human skull and is promoted as a cure-all for a variety of health conditions.
Is this the part that makes you mad ? It is what makes the article neutral. Not stating this would pass the pseudoscience as a real science and would therefore be a lack of neutrality.

>>108622444
Unless you can check every fact, this is a recipe for disaster.

>>108622460
Why would I fact check anything when low IQ normies reading my shit don't even know what is reality and what isn't

>>108622107
Right wingers are so fixated on how an actually well functioning non-profit works because it's an institution promoting reason and knowledge, qualities antithethical to their misdirected peasant rage and profusely low iq

File: 1297980946762.gif (14.9 KB)

14.9 KB GIF

>>108622473
Low IQ take

I donated $50 as an apology for vandalizing it.

File: wikimedia.jpg (43.9 KB)

43.9 KB JPG

does this make you mad?
the recurring monthly donations will continue. i might give more if anything

>>108622696
you should vandalize it more often

>>108622392
This. They need to be ethered on the regular.

File: 1748551123234296.png (63.2 KB)

63.2 KB PNG

>>108622107
Wikipedia is a static site that costs nothing to host compared to what they receive in donations. All the money you give them goes to random leftist activists to do jack shit and harass people

File: 1281483855560.gif (397.9 KB)

397.9 KB GIF

>>108623173
>>108623173
>All the money you give them goes to random leftist activists
I didn't know that. I'll donate 4x as much from now on, thanks.

JIMBO NEEDS A NEW PAIR OF SHOES, MOTHERFUCKER

>>108623173
This sounds like glavset agitprop. You're upset because they don't let you post your krokodil fantasies there.

>>108622107
Why would I? I don't need to check the Early Life section anymore.

>>108622107
I will when it stops using fake news as sources. I.e. never.

Daily reminder that Wikipedia doesn't need money. Wikipedia is entirely funded by the people who decide how articles must be redacted, and the only reason they ask for money is to pretend that they're independent.
You, of course, are free to donate any amount of money on top of what they already get from their actual funders, but any money you donate won't "help" them at all and has exactly zero effect on Wikipedia, so enjoy giving your money to another scummy millionaire for no reason. Remember to buy an iPhone and pay for YouTube Premium, Grok Gold, and Copilot+, all other millionaires deserve your money too even if they don't look at you with puppy eyes.

>>108622107
Why would you donate to people and have that on your permanent record?

>>108623530
you know you can check fiscal year reports? sub 1k donations are like 75% or more of total revenue. but given the conspiratorial angle here i suspect this doesnt matter and you'll now call me naive for believing them