>>108626305
1TB vram won't be enough for the newest 80k displays

>>108626305
whats the point of having a gazillion ram if two or three programs alone will gobble it all up
i wish i could be fine with little memory of all kinds but developers just wont let me

>>108626305
if 1tb is ever consumer level, then enterprise must be 1pb

>>108626322
>80k
the furthest any resolution ever has reason to go is 16k

>>108626305
I'd like to go back in time and swing by Bell labs or some other computational laboratory, and shove a micro SD card up my ass. "I've come from the future and I've got 1TB of (chinkshit) storage up my ass!". I'm curious if anyone would dare to take it out (assuming they believe me) for the sake of attaining technology years ahead of what they had at the time. I am obese, so it'd be quite the challenge.

>>108626391
yeah when you consider the pixels per degree the human eye can resolve, at 80k resolution filling your entire field of view would be several times higher ppd than you are able to see

>>108626430
they'd call for security to roll you out of the building

>>108626305
Imagine thinking there will be computers in the future. In reality you will be lucky to have running water let alone advanced technology.

>>108626305
It's called Jevons paradox brainlet

File: 1772735500151074.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

>>108626613
This. It was a fun ride, boys.

File: 1735416301713722.jpg (13.3 KB)

13.3 KB JPG

>>108626305
>Because you are never satisfied.
Why the fuck is it my fault the internet was enshittified beyond recognition and web broswers are more complex machines than the entire OS underneath? How is it my fault chrome decides to eat 20GB of ram to open a "modern" pajeetJS website?
I never asked for this.

File: 1767399493816151.jpg (7.3 KB)

7.3 KB JPG

>>108626305

>Your computer will, one day, have 1TB of VRAM and still won't be enough. Because you are never satisfied.
I know