we dont do bible stuff here

we don't do much at all, to be frank

File: photostudio_1775241876962.jpg (155.1 KB)

>>464018
You have only two color/light values that are extreme polar opposites but are trying to convey a concept of something being only patrially obscured...when pure darkness would hide things completely and pure light would expose them completely.

You need a middle ground where such a thing might not be noticed at first glance but won't be missed by a longer assessment. Pic related would be one way of doing it.

>>464021
good lord are you actually retarded? they explicitely mentioned how they want the negative spaces between the letters to form the secondary text...

File: photostudio_1749089086922.jpg (280.5 KB)

>>464025
Op's words cut and pasted-

>the words "I AM" hidden in the negative space between the lines

>hidden in the negative space

NOT

>negative spaces between the letters form the secondary text

The darker gray of course IS the negative space, and the "I AM" text is placed there with minimal contrast that obscures it between the other lines so the graphic EXACTLY follows the OPs parameters-

>the words "I AM" hidden in the negative space between the lines

Fucking mong...can't wait to hear what other psychotically inane blather you will pull out of your ass now that your stupidity has been thoroughly documented

File: goodbad.jpg (30.7 KB)

>>464026
you are kidding, right?! LMFAO

>For this type of "negative space" text to be legible, each letter has to be the the opposite of the previous letter
bruh everybody who is even mildly interested in design knows what OP is talking about. and you are an absolutefuckenmoron for feeling the necessity to "educate" anyone about white text on white background being invisible TOPKEK

File: Screenshot_20210912-095339_Firefox.jpg (56.0 KB)

>>464027
LOFL SO triggered and flailing for dominace that he's defending the design assumptions of someone whose first words were

>Complete and total noob here

whose EXACT words were-

>Either it's illegible, or the words "I AM" are completely invisible...any advice?

Yet when someone explains *why* that's happening and suggests other approches to CONSIDER, you sperg out like a retarded bot and act like everything this admitted noob says is solid graphic design theory that cannot be disputed.

Once again, troll refuses to address the OP's questions, offers zero opinions on OPs example, just attaches to anyone who tries like a tick in order to make the forum useless. What a sad child.

>>464025
lol i was like you til i realized >>464021 is much better than what op was conceiving and much more clear.

but yeah >>464027
op it seems wants a hybrid

File: white on white.jpg (422.8 KB)

>>464028
>proudly unable to grasp instructions when they are formulated by a noob
>tangent about alternatives and white in white is clearly invis, bre
>defending
>triggered
>sperging out
>oh such a sad, sad, sad little child

yep. clearly me who is flailing rofl