File: 0225Photo-1.jpg (3.7 MB)

3.7 MB JPG

>>18435339
There are no genuine descriptions. Besides, the Shroud of Turin is literally him and he looks super Jewish. He's not ugly, but he's not attractive. He actually looks like Isaiah 53's depiction of the Suffering Servant.
>He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.

File: 1743163565854416.jpg (831 KB)

831 KB JPG

>>18435344
>There are no genuine descriptions


educate yourself retard

>>18435344
>the Shroud of Turin is literally him and he looks super Jewish
Not saying that he didn't look jewish, but the shroud is a forgery

>>18435387
I've considered it, but it is almost certainly the Mandylion.

File: Know Your History or get teabagged by media and religion.png (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB PNG

>>18435339
>>18435344
the "most real" possible interpretation of the shroud is that it was an icon made for the Severan/Edessa dynasty and modeled on his relatives that looked most like Cleopatra VII due to themselves being the descendants of Drusilla of Mauretania, whom were Jesus' niece.
He was a greco-berber-italian mutt, but probably looked very similar to the "stereotypical" jesus.