Thread #65077283
File: NARP.jpg (181.6 KB)
181.6 KB JPG
Man, I can't wait for this beauty to hit the civilian market, although I fear it's gonna take at least 5-6 years.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkT-g_-Elz8
42 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: hot-fuzz-hot-fuzz-narp-3942715325.gif (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB GIF
>>65077283
>>65077338
>>65077343
That is just a Sig MCX, no?
>>65077313
>
>>
File: 1a2d204969e605118846755a4cef3c07.jpg (64 KB)
64 KB JPG
>>65077288
>>65077313
>NARP
>>
>>65077283
I was gonna watch the video, but it had a nigger in it so I turned it off.
>>65077338
The mag/magwell area looks fucking gross on all the 7.62x39 ars.
>>
>>
>"new" assault rifle platform
>piston AR
I mean I guess a quick detach rail and barrel is cool but we've had that tech forever.
In this essay, I will teach everyone the merits of the ACR and why it should return to production
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
I had a dream that beretta made an AR platform, and it had a feature where it could disconnect in the barrel to quickly turn it into an SBR
then i googled it and turns out its this, which isnt as sexy as the version in my dream
>>
>>
File: IMG_6563.jpg (42.3 KB)
42.3 KB JPG
>>65077283
So they basically made the MCX but actually functional now? What's the point when SIG will just win the bids anyway since they'll lowball the shit out of every other competitor?
>>
File: 1111111.jpg (447.2 KB)
447.2 KB JPG
its really annoying they couldn't just keep making the ARX. all that thing needed was smaller gas ports and better QC on the civilian models.
>>
>>
>>
>>65077930
Such as? There's a limited amount of ways you can feasibly make a gun, and whatever you do the end result may very well be indistinguishable from a user perspective. It's like with watches: you can feel superior all you want about the fancy mechanism inside, but a mechanical watch will tell the same time of any cheap Casio.
>>
File: 6a337d1da8e003cf9f1861e226e44746.jpg (144.8 KB)
144.8 KB JPG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>65082904
The only reason why I'm remotely interested is because our choices for non-AK 7.62 piston guns in Europe now are:
>Bren 2 - super mediocre accuracy for the price
>SIG Saar Spear LT - insane recoil and mediocre accuracy + SIG Saar build "quality"
I mean come on, 7.62x39 isn't inherently inaccurate, the original CMMG Mutant and the M92S rifles are very accurate for semis in that chambering. I can forgive the stupid name if they don't cock it up
>>
>>65082919
>choices for non-AK 7.62 piston guns
Is it available in 7.62?
There's a 5.56 version, and what seems like a 7.62 is probably the 6.5 grendel "praetorian" that was adopted by the GIGN.
Not that it would be difficult to make a 7.62 if they already have the grendel version, but haven't heard anything about it being offered.
>>
>>65082904
>What’s special about it?
Although it may look like a generic AR-15 at first glance, it incorporates several innovations that set it apart from the competition, see https://youtu.be/5H0q4SJHsEE
>>65082919
>SIG Saar
geeeg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>65082940
I only read that they're making "more chamberings" so one might be in the works like for the ARX
I just assumed it was a 7.62 mag because everyone was saying so and I'm not watching a fucking video as the first thing. I'd be fine with a 6.5 Grendel or 300 AAC gun too but both are still more expensive than 7.62x39