Did the propeller axles break in two again at high RPM ? This ship is value engineered to the max. When Bongladesh goes bankrupt in about 18-24 months it will be mothballed then sold to Japan and renamed "Whitsu Piggu".
BTW HMS Dargon Dildo has underdimensioned engine heat exchangers, so when they ingest 28 C warm mediterranian surface water, they cant deliver enough cooling capability. Value engineering! Lets assume our ship only ingests 8 C warm north atlantic water and dimension our cooling system accordingly so we can save £5 in materials!
>>65212756 It's a relatively new ship from a new ship design. Lots of things will breakdown and get fixed or modified. Having said that, naming it after a ship ignomiously sunk by the Japs is not a good omen.
>>65212876 in even WW2 (and prob WW1) on any USN ship it was given that of course there was a formal, mandatory constant hygiene program.
In Royal Navy it was at best an afterthought, and joke was to always make sure you anchor upwind of a RN ship, and for god's sake get out of any "invites".
3rd paragraph down >“A minor technical issue” was identified on the Royal Navy’s most powerful vessel during its latest stop in Stavanger, a port city in south-western Norway, the MoD said.The aircraft carrier is expected to sail in the coming days, the ministry added.
>>65212756 There is no future outside the EU. It's that simple. Without the EU Britain's decline began in earnest and all that's left now is for Farrage or Reform or whatever other oligarch to take control and fleece them into oblivion and de facto feudal system like Russia.
You have to remember the Telegraph has gone all in on American style political media warfare and because it's a labour government in they'll run these strident headlines to make the government look incompetent. Also Prince of Wales has a 4 month turnaround time, compared to the US CVNs turnaround time of 1-2 years.
>>65213151 And? There's so much new technology involved in it and despite commission in 2019 it's only really started operation cruises in the last two years. It's a large ship with consequently many issues, for example USS Nimitz was commissioned in 1972 and was on Restricted Availability till mid 1977 shaking out issues.
>>65213235 >make one (1) shitty pun about the HMS Prince of Wales >reeee you're samefagging! zigger! I'm gonna assume you're false flagging, but whether that is the case or not you are a repulsive, dysgenic little nigger
>>65213327 Except for everyone can see your shitty “jokes” were an attempt to bump and get traction on your thread. First one >>65212757 you posted shortly after the post timer, then the second one >>65212757 around 20mins later when nobody replied. It could not be more clear what type of narrative this thread was created to push.
>>65212756 >generic headline with no info >few random wiki facts below headline >stock picture >no info >no source Fuck OP and fuck Clara. Both useless cunts.
>>65212756 >Britain builds two carriers >Except both are always being repaired for issues solved since the first world war >Even when they do get a solid week of not-being-broken they have no escort, because Britain hasn't built an escort ship for 30 years and they're always broken down >Even when the escorts AREN'T broken, they have no missiles because budget cuts HOW? HOW DO YOU GET THIS INCOMPETENT?
>>65213193 I think people underestimate what an incredibly complex machine any aircraft carrier or submarine is. The Bongs also aren't serial producing tons of the same model, so all their type-related struggles are only spread across two ships, and there's less opportunities for later hulls to be updated to fix smaller issues with the class.
>>65212756 Why are you asking questions you already know the answer to? The military simply hasn't been a priority for most European countries since 1991 and the UK in particular had adopted an anti-submarine warfare role as part of its niche within NATO during the Cold War so it stopped giving a shit about developing further large-scale aircraft carriers for literally half a century. If Britain was willing to pay substantially more money for the navy for *decades*, because experience and learning take time, then yeah it would be back up to a higher standard.
>>65214827 Protip, if 25% of your population is on disabilities payments and the government is more interested in giving unlimited free money to foreigners in hotels than investigating massive nation-wide rape gang scandals, you can't afford a navy even if you wanted one.
>>65214845 Oh, look sopme completely coincidental offtopic agitprop. But remember, this isn't a Russian thread, there's no Russians around and no Russians have ever had aninterest in spreading anti-bong propaganda. Just completely organic /pol/shit out of nowhere.
The fact that Brits have no self awareness and just blame Russian agitprop for people reporting actual facts makes them deserve their nanny state bullshit.
>>65216878 Yeah, we're talking about how russophobic the brits are, and how they support the nazi cokehead Zolonsku and NATO who take Good American tax dollars to live lives of luxury with their warm water ports! Try to keep up
This thread is now about saying nice things about the RN. (Bongs you aren't making this easy, fund your fucking military.)
Running At-Sea Deterrence continiously without missing a day since the 60s is really fucking impressive for a nation of their size and they don't anywhere near enough credit for it.
65214845 >hotels 65216932 >hotels yeah I'm sure this is a thread about weapons and not a thread made just for kvetching about whatever the third world is upset about today
Russian shills frequently rely on highly cherry picked "True" information that lacks context and is used to advance a false narrative. Of course the dedovschina makes them permanently butthurt.
>>65217232 If Britain has the ship readiness/repair level of a second-world nation plagued with corruption currently at war, then they need to do better
>inb4 "ruzzian shill!!!!11!" I'm not saying Russia's military is good, in fact I'm saying the opposite, that it's a very low bar.
>>65212756 >WHY IS MY COUNTRY LIKE THIS?? Because your nation doesn't want to defend itself, it's government deliberately wants you weak and your population replaced by third worlders. And they think it's funny.
/pol/shit is not normally allowed, but if you thinly disguise it as a "critique of british equipment", you can post all sorts of /pol/ and /int/ shit that isn't even remotely on topic and snigger while you do it, knowing your entire thread is just about trolling bongs and the mods will let you get away with it. Meanwhile if you dare to suggest that maybe a piece of American gear isn't as good as advertised you can have a 3 day ban.
Oh look, another thread full of retards who think they have some kind of big secret all figured out. You schizo faggots are so insufferable. Like everything on this mongolian basket weaving forum is really some kind of government plot from somewhere because your retarded ass matters so much. I've been browsing /k/ since it was genuinely obscure and everyone on here talked about "going innawoods" and skinwalkers and fuck that was so cozy. Arrogant schizo retards ruin all the fun.
>but muh pol shit People have talked about pol shit on here for decades. Fuck off if it makes you butthurt. It's not a psyop and never was.