Thread #25214273
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
File: IMG_2088.jpg (146.3 KB)
146.3 KB
146.3 KB JPG
How come John Adam’s 7 year old son can write better than half of /lit/?
+Showing all 11 replies.
>>
Seems like most posters either did not read when younger or do not read now
>>
Higher standards. The founders were some of the most educated men in the country. From the Puritans on to the mid 1800s left a high watermark. That little boy would've had a personal tutor, studied Greek and Latin and would've read great works daily.

Farm boys in single-room school houses full of children of all ages in the 1920s would've been more educated than the vast majority of current college students today.
>>
>>25214292
> Farm boys in single-room school houses full of children of all ages in the 1920s would've been more educated than the vast majority of current college students today.
I doubt that, you watch too much Spielberg
>>
>tho
Seems to me like he'd fit right in
>>
>>25214300
Thos is funny.
>>
>>25214297
105 IQ and extremely ignorant
>>
>>25214279
"and/or" is uglier on the page, but "either/or" seems to imply some exclusivity, like it couldn't be both.
>>
My parents didn't deign to teach me how to read before elementary school at like age 7-8. Didn't do shit in kindergarten
>>
>>25214273
This Unitarian got all his progress almost completely reversed by Andrew Jackson. Might makes right.
>>
>>25214273
His writing isn't great, you only think that because he writes in an old style.
>>25214292
Delusional.
>>
>>25214929
You write something better than this 7 year old kid then.

Reply to Thread #25214273


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)