hang yourself OP

>>25217127
>goodreads
you aren't any better

What about a browser extension for filtering out retards on /lit/?

>>25217127
Great thread, look at the moids seething

File: images (18).jpg (9 KB)

9 KB JPG

>>25217127
It's pretty weird how women always uphold their social hierarchy. Like here you can see the queen bitch stands the closest to the camera, her two loyal ass lickers next to her, hidden in her shadow. Now the fourth one is dangerous, becouse she is obvious social-climber and will attempt to replace one of the two ass-lickers or debase the queen bitch. Behind her (women 5,6,7) is the common rabble, barely visible.
All this can be deduced from the framing of the video, the outfits and hair, but also the facial expression - you can see that they are supposed to be doing whatever expression the closest woman is doing. She is the only one, who 'nails it', becouse she came up with it and the others follow and try to emulate her.

File: Screen Shot 2026-04-18 at 4.48.40 AM.png (61.5 KB)

61.5 KB PNG

>>25217127
most people use their real names on goodreads for some reason, so it wouldn't be too hard to make. Remove this whole div if the label contains "Review by [woman's name]" referencing some list of women's names. Could vibe code that easily if you don't know how to write shit. Obviously not perfect because some men have women's names, but surely you won't be missing out on much lol. Goodreads reviews just suck either way, it's mostly just summaries with no critical analysis.
>>25217346
what the girls are doing here is gay but this fantasy you're projecting is even gayer lmao

>>25217389
His description of it is crude but it's a real thing

Also it'd probably be better to scrape all the reviews, remove the female ones, then recalculate all ratings.

>>25217393
yeah the social hierarchy thing is very real in normie girl friend groups, analyzing it the way he did is gay tho
and yeah good point, the overall rating should reflect men only. Assuming OP's only chance is vibe coding (since they're asking this here instead of writing it) that might be a way more involved project. Dunno how good claude and shit is these days though, maybe it's easy. Either way I think that name label is just about all there is to go off of for determining gender

>>25217416
I could do it in a day or less with Claude assuming their API doesn't have super strict limits and/or there's an existing dataset you could start from. I probably won't though, I barely ever use Goodreads.

>>25217127
Mental retardation. I protest this dishonest difammation of our women.

[...]The power of women in a society is one of the surest guarantees of the persistence of Aryan elements. The more this power is respected, the more one is justified in declaring the race that submits to it closer to the true instincts of the noble variety; now, the Germanic women had nothing to envy in their sisters from the ancient branches of the family (2).

Whether cause or result of these deferential habits, morals were generally so pure that in none of the national dialects is there a word to express the idea of a courtesan. It would seem that this situation was only known to the Germanic peoples following contact with foreign races, since the two oldest terms of this kind are the Finnish *kalkjö* and the Celtic *lenne* and *laënia* (2).

After fulfilling her duties of courtesy, the mistress of the house would sit beside her husband and join in the conversation. But before the banquet reached its most lively period, and when the fumes of drunkenness began to overwhelm the heroes, she would withdraw. This is still the custom in England, the country that has best preserved the remnants of Germanic traditions.[...]

From Arthur de Gobineau, Capacities of the native Germanic races