Thread #129994736
File: Saint-Saëns-circa-1880.jpg (140.4 KB)
140.4 KB JPG
Saint-Saëns edition
https://youtu.be/EG1rrpqCYTw
This thread is for the discussion of music in the Western (European) classical tradition, as well as classical instrument-playing.
>How do I get into classical?
This link has resources including audio courses, textbooks and selections of recordings to help you start to understand and appreciate classical music:
https://rentry.org/classicalgen
Previous: >>129972316
186 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
File: eeb17010d7c8c5694e9291d3fb2eda4c_grande.jpg (62.2 KB)
62.2 KB JPG
>>129994796
related image
>>
File: 81dI-c0+lsL._SL1500_[1].jpg (181.4 KB)
181.4 KB JPG
Brahms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VpISuRuqylc&list=OLAK5uy_keTyaf7z8DNX6 P1eKZiOU-pG2HzSy8Ds0&index=4
>>
>>129994796
Yeah none of that is necessary. One can enjoy classical music solely through feeling and intuition, the same they enjoy any other kind of music. It just has more to offer if you choose to examine it further.
>>
>>
File: Samstag+Licht+formula+segment+in+color[1].jpg (53 KB)
53 KB JPG
>>129994796
>>129994808
this image contains the secret to all music
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: chart.png (674.7 KB)
674.7 KB PNG
>>129995599
+ Annie Fischer and François-Frédéric Guy
if I could only have one... it'd probably depend on what day you asked me. If you asked me today, probably Annie Fischer's.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiS-MQV6QwM
>>
>>
>>129995676
Oh that's what I thought you were asking. So for Kempff, his stereo cycle DG is my favorite, but many aficionados claim his mono cycle is the best -- I've never understood it.
For Brendel, the 90s cycle on Philips.
For Backhaus, the stereo cycle on DG, though again, some people praise the mono but I haven't heard it myself.
For Arrau, the Decca cycle from the 60s.
For Barenboim, I like his 2007(?) Decca cycle the most, followed by his 90s DG set. His 70s EMI set is too indulgent for my tastes, and the newest pandemic DG set is just a man past his prime, but both are fine I guess.
>>
>>129995676
>>129995698
er, For Backhaus, the stereo cycle on Decca*
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: a0148485099_16[1].jpg (80.9 KB)
80.9 KB JPG
Are there any Osvaldas Balakauskas fans here? Apparently he died. He was a Latvian composer during the Soviet era. Scaruffi liked him:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdSFmCj0ldg
>The community of the Lithuanian Academy of Music and Theatre mourns a profound loss. At the age of 88, Osvaldas Balakauskas, long-time professor of the Composition Department at the LMTA Faculty of Music, former head of the department, prominent Lithuanian composer of modern music and pedagogue, and laureate of the Lithuanian National Prize for Culture and Arts, has passed away.
>Composer and pedagogue. He studied at the Faculty of Music of the Vilnius Pedagogical Institute (1957–1961) and later pursued composition studies at the Kyiv Conservatory in the class of Professor Borys Lyatoshynsky (1964–1969).
>Osvaldas Balakauskas was one of the few Lithuanian composers to consistently develop a distinctive musical language and an original compositional system. His artistic thinking was shaped by the avant-garde ideas of 20th-century music, including the works of Karlheinz Stockhausen, Pierre Boulez, Iannis Xenakis, Anton Webern, and Olivier Messiaen. His self-developed system of dodecatonics, based on multi-note diatonic structures, became a defining feature of his musical style.
>Osvaldas Balakauskas was also active in public life. He was a member of the Sąjūdis Council (1988–1992) and served as Ambassador of Lithuania to France, Spain, and Portugal (1992–1994).
https://lmta.lt/en/in-memoriam-osvaldas-balakauskas-1937-2026/
>>
>>
>>
>>129994848
A truly exceptional cycle. Only retards complain because it doesn't follow the metronome markings. Sure, I wouldn't want it to be the only interpretation of Beethoven, but it's not like that precludes enjoyment of it.
>>
>>
>be Bela Bartok
>write into the score that a piece should take exactly 1 minute 40 seconds to perform
>record your own piece
>duration: 1 minute 50 seconds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dy7n5m5HDPs
What did he mean by this?
>>
>>129997019
It's objectively a low iq complaint. Why can't you just be like Mackerras and respect a different interpretation while not following it yourself? Beethoven of all people would not be opposed to ultra-romantic, organicist approach to tempo if he lived long enough to be brainwashed by it. This is the same man that swallowed whole everything Hoffmann wrote about him.
>>
>>129997080
>Beethoven of all people would not be opposed to ultra-romantic, organicist approach to tempo if he lived long enough to be brainwashed by it
We have a multitude of anecdotes from Beethoven being incessantly butthurt about people performing his music incorrect, especially in regards to tempo. So, no, he wasn't really like Brahms or Bruckner. It wasn't like that style of performance practice didn't exist in Beethoven's time.
>>
>>129997102
>It wasn't like that style of performance practice didn't exist in Beethoven's time.
Of course it didn't. Beethoven was complaining about people just plain getting his tempos wrong or not caring about accurate tempo, not people with a late romantic philosophy architecturally shaping the music. There's an enormous difference.
>>
>>129997114
You don't need late romantic philosophy to futz about with tempo in the same manner, which happened all the time back in the baroque and classical period. Most of what we know about tempo rubato from Chopin and Liszt was described in a similar way by CPE.
>>
>>129997142
>Most of what we know about tempo rubato from Chopin and Liszt was described in a similar way by CPE.
Could you refer me to some quotes? I'm suspicious to say the least. But it's not just a matter of rubato, often the entire tempo is different.
>>
>>129997197
It isn't really something that can be summed up in just a few quotes, you need to ready the entire treatise, but generally speaking CPE was a major proponent of the idea of keeping the two hands separated, one playing in time and the other playing ahead or behind depending on the interpretive insights of the performer.
>When the execution is such that one hand seems to play against the measure and the other strictly with it, the performer may be said to be doing everything that can be required of him. In such cases all notes and rests must receive their exact value... As soon as the upper part begins to anticipate or hesitate, the bass must keep strictly to the pulse.
Chopin's students described his piano playing the same way.
>In keeping time Chopin was inexorable, and it will surprise many to learn that the metronome never left his piano. Even in his much-slandered rubato, one hand, the accompanying hand, always played in strict tempo, while the other—singing, either indecisively lingering or passionately anticipating forward with a certain impatient vehemence—freed the truth of the musical expression from all rigid bonds."
>"The right hand is the conductor, it must not waver or lose ground; do with the left hand what you will and can."
>"Do you see those trees? The wind plays in the leaves, stirs up life among them, but the tree remains the same. That is the Chopin rubato!"
I mean, sure, structural rubato became stronger during the romantic period and more sweeping changes were made to the whole, ala Wagner, Mahler, Mengelberg, and others, but it's not as if the other style died off; there were still plenty of conductors and musicians that performed music closer to the original style of melodic/contrapuntal rubato. And both can be considered facets of the romantic tradition. The point is that freedom of interpretation existed in Beethoven's time and I don't think philosophical wankery around it would have done much to change his mind.
>>
>>
File: folder.jpg (105 KB)
105 KB JPG
Tannhauser morning
https://litter.catbox.moe/r8tyk7.mp3
>>
>>129995599
There's one more I forgot: Buchbinder, his newest DG cycle is his best.
His first cycle on EMI is meh, his second cycle on Sony is good, and this third one is great.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtOG84xsaSA&list=OLAK5uy_kXQJwv9CSPxwH YmS5yZ4xllWRauCen53A&index=80
>>
File: 61tCccW8DmL._SL1000_[1].jpg (90.7 KB)
90.7 KB JPG
now playing
start of Mahler: Symphony No. 1 in D Major "Titan"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4LUcHXMaEE&list=OLAK5uy_kfWJspr5hfj-l 90N68iw9iVtb8xWq5RD0&index=2
start of Mahler: Symphony No. 2 in C Minor "Resurrection"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOPeVygr1uo&list=OLAK5uy_kfWJspr5hfj-l 90N68iw9iVtb8xWq5RD0&index=5
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_kfWJspr5hfj-l90N68iw9iVt b8xWq5RD0
>The Czech Philharmonic and Music Director, Semyon Bichkov, continue their acclaimed Mahler cycle with the composer’s First Symphony, one of the most evocative and colourful symphonic debuts in the history of the genre. Mahler once famously said that “a symphony should be like the world, it should encompass everything.” In his First Symphony, he creates just such a world, filled with animal sounds, hunting horns, rural dances, klezmer bands and allusions to his own songs and folk song melodies such as Frère Jacques. These elements all function within a highly subjective, immersive symphonic drama, providing a blueprint for most of his symphonies to come. Semyon Bichkov and the Czech Philharmonic approach the composer’s firstling with their esteemed eye for detail and pacing, matched by their unmistakably Bohemian sound.
>Starting with a funeral march, passing through the introspective alto song “Urlicht” and ending in choral bliss and euphoria, Mahler’s Second is a deeply spiritual and personal contemplation on the secret of life and the possibility of overcoming death. For Bichkov, the symphony “shows the life cycle in all its struggles: suffering, joy, irony, humour, love and doubt.”
>>
>>
File: Sofia-Sacco-385-WEBCover[1].jpg (799.8 KB)
799.8 KB JPG
Shostakovich
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiYmKfLVRTM&list=OLAK5uy_mKaayC3UDGWMt MIgYegTqWLauQTv_L61c&index=26
>>
>>
File: 1551071445534.jpg (10.2 KB)
10.2 KB JPG
I CAN'T STOP LISTENING TO BOCCHERINI
>>
>>
>>
>>130000204
He has around 580 numbers in his catalogue. I only have 73 Boccherini tracks in my library, so I tried to estimate from there. The average movement seems to be around 4 minutes, and most of his works have 2-4 movements, so let's say 3 on average.
580 x 3 = 1740 movements x 4 minutes = 6960 minutes, which is about 116 hours.
But that's mostly chamber and symphonic logic. He also wrote operas, sacred works, etc., so it's probably a bit higher. I'd bump it to somewhere around 125-130 hours as a very rough estimate.
That would put him among the more prolific composers, though still below the really extreme cases like Bach, Telemann, Vivaldi, Haydn, Mozart, Liszt, etc.
>>
File: Marin-Alsop-American.jpg (136.7 KB)
136.7 KB JPG
I always misread Alsop as AI slop (AIslop)
>>
>>
>>
>>129993780
Literally no
>No one including me has listened to Bruch's most acclaimed works which are all vocal so not worth asking.
>immediately proven wrong
>W-WRITE A DISSERTATION ON THIS SPECIFIC WORK OR YOU'RE WRONG ;_;
Reger mogs mediocre Bruch any day of the week, and you're a midwit with no argument
>>
>>
>>
>>130000170
>>130000204
>>130000402
I'm the one who's been posting a lot of Boccherini lately. My count is just under 80 hours (almost 1000 tracks). While, granted, I couldn't find a lot of his works, I scourged the net and checked with three different work lists to find as much as I could. Considering that the stuff I couldn't find was by and large theatrical and liturgical stuff, it could easily bump the total time by 10, maybe 15 more hours. I don't think the whole shebang would reach 100 though.
>>
>>
>>
>>130001450
You didn't prove anything. You replied to my first statement with an assertion of your own experience with the composer, which isn't proof. People claim all sorts of things on 4chan. I asked for evidence of your familiarity and even suggested a couple of the works I meant to indicate in Moses and Arminius. Not my fault you got pressed about it but you shouldn't have replied to me if you weren't willing or able to make the case.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: COmposer.png (2.9 MB)
2.9 MB PNG
Ai is pretty useful. I used it to make an A-Z of composers, I'm going to print it off and hang it on my wall
>>
>>
File: KEKW.png (19.7 KB)
19.7 KB PNG
>>130001617
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>130001617
Kek
>>130001629
Eat shit and live stream it on tiktok.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
The problem with opera is there aren't really that many masterpieces, and even the number of near-masterpieces isn't very high either. Plenty of good works worth listening to once, sure, but really you'll be spending most of your time listening to the same handful of masterpieces over and over. The rotation is too small. Granted, operas range anywhere from 2-4 hours, which is 3-7 symphonies worth of music, so it does balance out a bit.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>130001817
Right, that's the other part I originally meant to say. Ideally, you'd only listen to an opera once a week, or every couple days. Spaced out like that, you can be a very happy man with the genre, exploring new recordings of the masterpieces over and over at a reasonable pace.
But when you're listening to 3-5 a day, you get into a "I listened to Tristan und Isolde two days ago but fine, I guess I can listen to it again today... and again two days from now..."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: R-9413957-1646464371-8987.jpg (68.4 KB)
68.4 KB JPG
>>130001849
Do you ever listen to collections of just arias?
>>
>>
>>
>>130001950
Occasionally I'll peep singer recitals like >>129994387 as I come across them or they come out, but for the most part no, only full operas at a time. I think I'm gonna start listening to individual Acts at a time instead though. More variety, build more familiarity with third Acts that I often only hear after I've already been focusing for 2-3 hours, etc.
>>
File: 81llnGvE+7L._SL1201_[1].jpg (298.6 KB)
298.6 KB JPG
now playing
start of Beethoven: Piano Sonata No. 9 in E Major, Op. 14, No. 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1TJVwm8ku4&list=OLAK5uy_moYMz31N2nGud yFBCfkyLu5-7iD7S6UDo&index=11
start of Beethoven: Piano Sonata No. 17 in D Minor, Op. 31, No. 2, "Tempest"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hJnuSs7JIw&list=OLAK5uy_moYMz31N2nGud yFBCfkyLu5-7iD7S6UDo&index=14
start of Beethoven: Piano Sonata No. 30 in E Major, Op. 109
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dG5yEGvvf74&list=OLAK5uy_moYMz31N2nGud yFBCfkyLu5-7iD7S6UDo&index=16
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_moYMz31N2nGudyFBCfkyLu5- 7iD7S6UDo
>>
>>
>>
File: Mr Scriabi.jpg (177 KB)
177 KB JPG
Why aren't you listening to Scriabin anons?
>>
>>
File: 1760786697567880.jpg (161.3 KB)
161.3 KB JPG
>>130002570
I don't blame you, Scriabin uses Pandiatonic psychic shifts in the first prelude that overwhelms the uninitiated, but press on and you will be spiritually renewed anon.
>>
File: 91qoIpuk0vL._SL1500_[1].jpg (147.7 KB)
147.7 KB JPG
now playing
start of Rachmaninoff: Piano Concerto No. 2 in C Minor, Op. 18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A679MJOZYic&list=OLAK5uy_lWRDvHlgay7rK NFLggoyduxujYBeoXRpI&index=2
start of Rachmaninoff: Piano Concerto No. 3 in D Minor, Op. 30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnQVUc_L3A0&list=OLAK5uy_lWRDvHlgay7rK NFLggoyduxujYBeoXRpI&index=4
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=OLAK5uy_lWRDvHlgay7rKNFLggoyduxu jYBeoXRpI
>>
>>
File: NC0yODk2LmpwZWc[1].jpg (146.7 KB)
146.7 KB JPG
It's time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsaXwGdmdIk&list=OLAK5uy_mfpKejSc8IOqy lPzM1LU2MgjfdLt5ZFfc&index=159
Interesting how they changed the color of the album cover over time (the posted pic vs. the updated one used in the link). Less soul, more polish.
>>
>>
File: Stockhausen_CDs[1].jpg (712.2 KB)
712.2 KB JPG
SOVL album covers
>>
>>
>>
>AnonFindsTheHolyGrail.jpg
>>
File: file.png (213.6 KB)
213.6 KB PNG
>>130003916
stockhausen is shit garbage for trannies
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>130004247
it's garbage for trash people who eat shit and are garbage
>>130004251
it literally was
>>
File: angry-face-emoji-clipart-lg[1].png (8.3 KB)
8.3 KB PNG
>anon's face when I short-handedly refer to Liszt's work as the Trans Etudes
>>
>>
File: 1749381639732599.png (1.8 MB)
1.8 MB PNG
>>129994736
doesnt get better than this
>>
>>
>>
>>130004372
his Beethoven Piano Sonatas set is slightly overlooked too!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGn4FRS4ilc&list=OLAK5uy_kEggyWYCrxEop dQsj_AwdkN28O7Ss2T-o&index=67
The biggest bummer is he didn't record the second book of Bach's WTC -- he has a recording of the first book which is pretty great
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZugKwMsY98&list=OLAK5uy_k3eMNvM7RrFpV V0r3zpJ3fjOMJfKwkMXA&index=25
>>
>>
>>
File: 1748342696217167.jpg (86.1 KB)
86.1 KB JPG
>>130004410
His ballades are also peak
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>130001785
opera has many masterpieces
>l'Orfeo
>Popea
>Xerxes
>Giulio Cesare
>Rinaldo
>Seraglio
>Idomeneo
>Figaro
>Giovanni
>Magic Flute
>Barbiere
>Aida
>Macbeth
>Otello
>Falstaff
>Rigoletto
>Don Carlo
>La Traviata
>Pagliacci
>La Boheme
>Madama Butterfly
>Turandot
>Tosca
>Les Contes d'Hoffmann
>Les Huguenots
>Les Troyens
>Der Freischütz
>Tannhauser
>Lohengrin
>Der Ring des Nibelungen
>Parisfal
>Tristan
>Meistersinger
>Mefistofele
>Eugene Onegin
>Wozzeck
>Lulu
>Porgy and Bess
>Peter Grimes
>Salome
>Der Rosenkavalier
>>
>>
>>
>>130004861
the ones on your list I actively re-listen to,
>Figaro
>Giovanni
>Magic flute
>Aida
>Macbeth
>Otello
>Falstaff
>Rigoletto
>Don Carlo
>La Boheme
>Madama Butterfly
>Turandot
>Tosca
>Tannhauser
>Lohengrin
>Lord of the Rings
>Parsifal
>Tristan und Isolde
>Meistersinger
>Eugene Onegin
>(i WILL learn to appreciate Wozzeck one day)
>Peter Grimes
>Salome
>Der Rosenkavalier
And I of course have all of Strauss' on regular rotation. Like I said, when you're listening to 3-5 daily, it really doesn't feel like that much.
>>
>>
>>130004942
>That is becasue Opera is the inferior genre.
I don't think that follows from anything that's been said, anon. All we can infer so far is opera is harder to write, plus requires more resources, so it probably wasn't worth writing them unless had an idea you really, really loved and had to get out there.
>>
The primary imperfection of Parsifal, or perhaps more accurately the biggest missed opportunity, is the lack of female voices in the third act. The structure goes Act 1 almost all male voices -> Act 2 female dominated -> Act 3 all male voices, when it would have worked better as a dialectic, as a merger of the masculine and feminine, to have Act 3 equally consist of both. But what do I know.
>>
>>
File: bayring0722A[1].jpg (219.9 KB)
219.9 KB JPG
this kills the wagnersister
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLljZKkBSj4
>>
Brahms 3 and Brahms 4 are such a nice juxtaposition. One is joyful, the other tragic; both heroic and spirited. You listen to the 3rd to start the day, to inspire you, and the 4th to end it, for emotional catharsis. For symphonies with classical structure, it doesn't get better than this.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: img-1-small480.jpg (458.3 KB)
458.3 KB JPG
HIGHLY recommend the Asahina Siegfried if you, like me, love the Karajan Ring save for Jess Thomas's young Siegfried.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtETBPVlrAM
Tetsuya Ohno sounds more like Brilioth from K's Gotterdammerung than Thomas does, and the Brunnhilde Kiyomi Toyoda is WONDERFUL.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>130008101
Good voices, but maybe a bit too soft edged in the conducting for me. However, I am very surprised Japanese singers can sound so idiomatic. Hell, they sound more German than most German singers these days lol
>>130008874
Because it's four straight hours of near consecutive singing with very little breaks and it's incredibly technically demanding.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>130008887
yeah their German pronunciation is crazy good, though you can kind of hear the Wotan say "Eruda" when he summons Erda lol
>>130008938
american post
>>
File: hq720.jpg (35.1 KB)
35.1 KB JPG
The Five Worst Mahler Conductors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoA_UQ093NE
>Osmo Vänskä
>Giuseppe Sinopoli
>Lorin Maazel
>Simon Rattle
>Yevgeny Svetlanov
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 51BlonlZjHL[1].jpg (54.2 KB)
54.2 KB JPG
the best part about listening to Gotterdammerung? knowing that the next day, I can start listening to a new Ring cycle :D let's go old school this time. not the Knappertsbusch though, something about the sound quality is too off-putting for me. so we go with Furtwangler 1950 instead
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcOhIF1Mq2I&list=OLAK5uy_krUiIOdREye1K PLepNVr2f1tmkoRdu5BA&index=29
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>130009476
Are there? That's your assertion, not the truth. Even if there were such conductors, how do you measure if whatever Rattle utterly butcheted outweighs the 0 good recordings person, unless they too have utterly butchered everything they recorded?
>>
>>
>>