Anonymous Ferrari Luce (redesign concept)
06/06/26(Sat)21:29:21
No.
28975874
(�/�#��X=� (Wand?�d��a���M���р+���j; Showing all 22 replies.
>>
Anonymous
06/06/26(Sat)21:32:51
No.
28975877
That looks fairly okay, also looks fairly chinese for some reason
>>
Anonymous
06/06/26(Sat)21:33:55
No.
28975879
>>28975874 No, it's too Conservative and adds nothing to the design direction. They designed the worst thing possible for attention and IG clicks. It's intentionally abrasive just so that rich thirdies can buy it and act big man on the plantation and drive something ugly because you're too poor to.
>>
Anonymous
06/06/26(Sat)21:50:50
No.
28975896
>>28975874 Can they redesign it with a V12 too? Otherwise, fuck off.
>>
Anonymous
06/06/26(Sat)22:09:03
No.
28975927
>>28975896 Gas should go up to 20 bucks per gallon.
>>
Anonymous
06/06/26(Sat)22:15:30
No.
28975938
>>28975927 You'll be singing a different tune when your soulless electric transport appliances are competing with the infinite slop generators for the world's electrical supply.
>>
Anonymous
06/06/26(Sat)22:33:43
No.
28975955
>>28975927 >Implying electricity doesn't go up when draw increases Why are the dumbest people into EVs? Is it just a bug person thing.
>>
Anonymous
06/06/26(Sat)23:56:33
No.
28976023
>>28975874 The problem is this is an entirely different car. Scale this up to still be a midsize bench seat crossover and it's still problematic
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)00:04:48
No.
28976032
>>28975874 it's not just a face problem, the car literally has a polestar problem where the car has fucked up profile proportion because of the battery pack. I don't know how tesla avoided it but apparently the european industry has no clue
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)06:23:44
No.
28976395
>>28975938 >>28975955 >gascucks seething kek
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)09:14:00
No.
28976500
>>28975874 looks like a civic
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)09:34:30
No.
28976515
>>28975874 Now it doesn't look appalling anymore but "just" normal, really vanilla and boring.
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)10:02:25
No.
28976534
Looks like any other chinkbrick They should have made it more radical looking
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)12:38:08
No.
28976653
>>28976032 everything was better in 2009, even car design... especially car design.
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)12:53:43
No.
28976670
>>28976395 >Y-you're seething!!!!
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)14:11:18
No.
28976753
>>28976670
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)15:14:08
No.
28976817
>>28976032 Polestar 2 is way better than Tesla so whatever compromises they made was for the better.
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)16:55:36
No.
28976960
>>28976395 >no argument I accept your concession, /n/igger.
>>
Anonymous
06/07/26(Sun)17:49:06
No.
28977011
>>28976960 I accept your surrender, gascuck.
>>
Anonymous
06/09/26(Tue)00:51:48
No.
28978732
(�/�c��X = ��ߘ�~����^�����eu���k��1������������Jl� Z��\��bu�]��X[sU���Ķ/kN�+�Bw�������J4~�LkY�V0*
>>
Anonymous
06/09/26(Tue)01:19:31
No.
28978769
(�/�#��X�� �Ѽ����V�������3���#�ͽsu����� B�f4��y�_C/���*ϸ��~�m�� �ppB�����g��"SȢ4T*
>>
Anonymous
06/09/26(Tue)03:20:00
No.
28978862
(�/�#��XM� 8<9767ed�����2���X$�10
>>
Anonymous
06/10/26(Wed)20:54:53
No.
28980657
(�/�#��X�5
Reply to Thread #28975874
↑ ← Back 🔍