Which altitude are we talking about?

>>2867937
>aren't the soles gonna be too soft for hiking
What do you mean 'too soft for hiking'?

File: 414DV5vPa8L._AC_SY900_.jpg (17.4 KB)

>>2867937
Most durable, consistently comfortable and trail sticky shoes I've ever owned. You get what you pay for.

>>2867937
This is like asking "what model Miata will haul 5,000 pounds of mulch and sleep 6?"
If you cant afford a second pair of shoes you should be taking courses at the local community College in your spare time to get a better job instead of hiking

>>2867937
Generally you shouldnt wear down hiking shoes/trail runners with daily use and especially running on concrete but if so then any pair of trail runners will probably fit your retarded jack of all trade plan. If you want to save money and you ddo in fact lilive in the US then try looking at what Sierra has in stock

File: Discovery boots.jpg (131.1 KB)

>>2867937
I wear a Discovery pair, in light brown, so far pretty good. I've went to two hikes (15 miles total), no blisters and I used them casually too.

Walking, and especially running, around on concrete in urban settings is going to quickly wear down the lugs that making hiking shoes effective.

Why this little guy so horny?

Vans makes shoes with hiking soles and they have a line called Ultra Range that are better suited for outdoors. I used to have a pair of Ultra Ranges but they were kind of lousy. They were better than regular vans or sneakers but way worse than actual hiking boots.
Vans has different shoes with vibram soles though you could look into those.