>>2869046
Dont you want to camp in the backcountry (in an area popular enough to have a permit system) without seeing and hearing a bunch of other fuckers?

Imagine being so cucked by the government that you actually try to win a fucking lottery to be allowed to go innawoods and only camp in designated spots lmaaaoo

>>2869046
Such is life in a low trust society. What are you going to do, let the boondockers overstay their welcome and cover random sites in litter with no way to catch them?
The reservation system make it possible to kick the undesirables out.

>>2869116
I love it when newfags wander into threads they have no idea what is being discussed and then offer their opinion like it fucking matters. There are no boondockers in the backcountry. Also OP is just a troll who has like you never touched grass but he knows the lingo.

File: IMG_8632.jpg (298.8 KB)

>>2869046
Permits and designates sites are necessities for heavily-trafficked areas. You’d know that if you’ve ever been to a national forest or wilderness area that has a lot of visitors.
>backcountry in quotes
Yes, as opposed to frontcountry. These are well established terms that were familiar with but confuse and anger you. Also note that “car camping” does not mean sleeping in your car (/out/ hates that fact and insists otherwise). Pic is from NPS.gov

I just got back from a portaging trip. It was 40 Canadian rubles for a 3 day 2 person trip. For that we got sites with guaranteed room for tents, a fire pit and a picnic table. They actually came around and checked permits so ensure no squatters which is nice. They also provide maps and info about the park. Worth the price of admission. Why are you going to a maintained park and complaining about fees if what you want is the middle of fucking nowhere?

>>2869046
it doesn't