>>2870856
Leave No Trace has nothing to do with how agencies or local gov or whatever manage land. Its just a campaign by a nonprofit of the same name to get visitors to high traffic areas of public land to not fuck shit up. It has nothing to do with arguments about developing or not developing natural resources for recreation.

File: article (1).jpg (185.5 KB)

>>2870856
I think uninterrupted nature is pretty cool too

>>2870856
So....you shit in the parking lot and left a pile of garbage for everyone to enjoy?

>>2870862
needs more beavers

>>2870856
Well for one, it's because it's hard to plan for the proper result without running into some far reaching and horrific oversight. Ecosystems are very complicated.

Besides that, the first post got it right and that's not even what Leave No Trace is about.

>meadow is an old overgrown field
You don't know shit about either the land or farming.

(�/�c��XL�S�!��~-�~fo���yk��ת�:%
$����h�4ͼ�+�U��\��R�Jo�8��Άk/(�U�v�#��G�ֆ\�z�_H
f�<�_����0���l�n9���>��(hC0�E"����O

(�/�#��X[%
`<708. OP, a.���4��ea��&�c���oQ�

(�/�c��Xb
M����6�k�t�E���R"��C� ���K�@�|�D��+ʢzbC�98����$�}��)v���x_w�a|w~ji��Z������ͤ@�B���p:]ݹ�0"��hd�gↇ�<�
*9W v�xGV����<�AY/����/;�OQ�ԏ�F�h�Ƈu;/�8�IE��q�[�KFD
/�Tk��ƹ��%`<~c�I$�