File: barbershop.jpg (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB JPG

>>4503435

File: ghost tree.jpg (4.4 MB)

4.4 MB JPG

>>4503437

File: DSCF9451.jpg (2.2 MB)

2.2 MB JPG

i finally got outside wiht a camera

>>4503444
trips of halation
nice light but i have to question the composition. too much information to be specifically directing my eye at something. too narrow, not enough information to be a full survey of the space

>>4503522
Sorry for all the dust spots

>>4503522
My god, shit lighting can absolutely ruin the photos of most kino places. Disgusting.

The incompetent retards who run this site are never giving EXIF back to us /p/haggots, are they?

File: DSCF6435.jpg (4.1 MB)

4.1 MB JPG

technically a twilight scene

File: jokes on you.jpg (3.4 MB)

3.4 MB JPG

>>4503536
the mountains really are purple, damn.

File: battle of autozone.jpg (3.6 MB)

3.6 MB JPG

>>4503538

File: bloody.jpg (3.6 MB)

3.6 MB JPG

>>4503539

File: losers slink away.jpg (3.4 MB)

3.4 MB JPG

>>4503540

File: jeff.jpg (3.4 MB)

3.4 MB JPG

>>4503541

File: IMGP0832.jpg (3.6 MB)

3.6 MB JPG

>>4503540
this is a cool framing, ever consider cropping?
or is that sacrilege.

File: car trails full.jpg (3 MB)

3 MB JPG

>>4503543
ty. I crop sometimes, >>4503537 (which I realize now I also mega compressed for some reason) is a crop which I think better balances the scene but honestly neither are incredible images.

File: 1766932489521651.jpg (48.9 KB)

48.9 KB JPG

>>4503548

>>4503523
What the fuck happened man?

>>4503550
kek

File: IMG_9700.jpg (3.7 MB)

3.7 MB JPG

>>4503561
Change lenses frequently during a long trip, and you!ll get some dust

>>4503564
You didn't take a little dust blower? The mini size Giotto can fit in pretty much any camera bag.

File: KING8920-1.jpg (4 MB)

4 MB JPG

>>4503435
Blade Runner seems like real life nowadays... very nice picture.

File: IMG_9717.jpg (3.7 MB)

3.7 MB JPG

.

File: P Green.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

>>4503645
So, /p/ turned my fox green. Great. Wonderful artistic choice.

File: IMG_0914.jpg (4.3 MB)

4.3 MB JPG

>>4503645
kawaii
>>4503616
>>4503548
>>4503522
cool

File: IMG_3273.jpg (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB JPG

>>4503662
Arigato.

I like all the interweaving lines in your picture. I don't have the skillset to pull something like that off.

File: 1775328848288021_02_02.jpg (3.9 MB)

3.9 MB JPG

>>4503522
Good morning saar!

>>4503526
Good morning saar!

>>4503675
Looks fantastic, thank you

File: redp copy.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

Back once again with the scuffed PP

File: DSC_0556 (1).jpg (3.3 MB)

3.3 MB JPG

From a weekend camping trip

>>4503675
Very nice
>>4503714
Lovely retro feel
>>4503716
This is a wonderful capture
>>4503724
2/2

File: DSC_0586 (1).jpg (2 MB)

2 MB JPG

>>4503726
>forgets to attach image

File: P1160227.jpg (771.2 KB)

771.2 KB JPG

>>4503726
Thanks. Velvia 50.

File: IMG_0948.jpg (3.3 MB)

3.3 MB JPG

>>4503747
Crazy pic
>>4503716
Nice shot. Got it on the right time

>>4503647
Does 4chan really manipulate uploaded images? Does it look correct if you open the local image in your browser? I think maybe your jpg is exported with adobe RGB instead of sRGB which is the only color space supported by browsers

>>4503647
>>4503771
4chan strips EXIF data and that can include things like color profiles or brightness data. /p/ actually used to be the exception to that rule but the hack a few years ago meant EXIF couldn't come back online for /p/, so it now it strips data as standard like other boards.

>>4503778
Pretty sure this is where John Lennon penned the line ‘I am the eggman’.

File: 000022.jpg (3.2 MB)

3.2 MB JPG

>>4503454
I like packing my photos full of information, makes it feel more naturalistic, at least to me. I don't try to make a photo much more than a simple scene or setting, almost like something you'd see in a painting. Though I'll keep it in mind in future, thanks anon.

File: 0073.jpg (1.3 MB)

1.3 MB JPG

>>4503435

File: DSC09504.jpg (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB JPG

Love the shapes and colors, but the crop could be a bit better

>>4503876
Cropping in on a phone picture was certainly an interesting choice.

File: IMG_3273-2.jpg (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB JPG

>>4503771
>>4503774
I'm not sure... I re-exported this shot in sRGB
>>4503667

>>4503891
Well, that was it.

File: IMG_3337-2.jpg (1.5 MB)

1.5 MB JPG

>>4503891
>>4503892
I guess I'll re-upload the first one. I was happy with this shot.

>>4503891
>>4503892
>>4503894
so it was because of exif or something?
what did you change to make it work?

File: IMG_3292-2.jpg (2.1 MB)

2.1 MB JPG

>>4503895
Lightroom was exporting in "ProPhoto RGB", whatever that is. I changed it to sRGB and everything looks fine now.

>>4503897
>Lightroom was exporting in "ProPhoto RGB", whatever that is.
Pretty much anything that isn't just sRGB is not something you'll use unless you do serious commercial work (as in you're putting your shit up on billboards or very serious printing). I'm a little surprised you hadn't experienced any issues anywhere else up to this point.

File: IMG_3298-2.jpg (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB JPG

>>4503898
I'm entering a photo contest soon. I have the pictures printed and they look good. I might do a little digging to see if they'll look better if I send them to the printer in sRGB. Live and learn, I guess.

File: clipped-clr2.jpg (434.7 KB)

434.7 KB JPG

ir

>>4503907
Outstanding. Excellent color and lighting. Almost insignificant suggestion, lower the exposure on the handle to the right. Just a touch.

>>4503907
Seems like you spent some time setting this up, good on you for taking on something ambitious. The colors are fucked and its underexposed. The composition does not follow any of the basics with respect to rule-of-thirds and leading lines. Its unpleadant to look at and it doesnt speak

>>4503938
what's my grade, professor?

File: 1775578452040786_01.jpg (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB JPG

>>4503971
thoughts?

File: 1775578452040786_02.jpg (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB JPG

>>4503976
thoughts?

File: 321.png (932.7 KB)

932.7 KB PNG

Fuji 200 isn't my favorite, but I kind of like this one.

>>4503981
people would say it's too dark but I like vibes like this

>>4503971
>>4503976
either of these is fine. Depends on if you want mood or blue
>>4503978
too bright

File: a cloud 3k.jpg (2.6 MB)

2.6 MB JPG

>>4503714
there are some weird blue halos around the out of dof foreground bits, did you brighten up the sky or something?

File: P1160202.jpg (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB JPG

>>4504001
I had to resize it on my phone to squeeze under 4chin's size restrictions.

File: Screenshot_20260407_232832_Brave.jpg (432.6 KB)

432.6 KB JPG

>>4504001
>>4504011

Lightroom "I cant live without AI masks" users will defend this

Also read the fucking sticky before posting. Actually never post again. Literal embodied tragedy, subway runner generation

File: 214.png (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB PNG

>>4503988
Thank you. I have a couple that are underexposed/ slightly blurry and I like them a lot.

>>4504011
yeah i dont think this was done by resizing
>>4504015
wtf is your problem though

File: DSCF36407922-Edit-3.jpg (310.3 KB)

310.3 KB JPG

I really fucked up when I snapped this one and overexposed it. How did I do fixing it? Anything I need to work on more?

File: vitamin e.jpg (305.7 KB)

305.7 KB JPG

>>4503908
>>4503938
i agree

>>4503981
>>4504016
What settings are you using for night? I'm only just getting started with film and night has never been my best work even on digital. I like using Fuji 200 too, hence my asking.

File: DSC4165.jpg (846.4 KB)

846.4 KB JPG

I saw this pale blue 50s looking building and thought the pastel look was pretty cool.

>>4504035
I think it looks pretty well saved but maybe a little overcorrected, so it has a bit too much of a HDR look going on. I'd personally push the exposure back up just a little bit.

File: 1775602504281918_01.jpg (729.9 KB)

729.9 KB JPG

>>4504035
>>4504067

thoughts?

>>4504035
looks good to me, green and vibrant

>>4504068
don't let any anons psyop you into thinking this is an improvement or that you did something wrong in the first instance.

>>4504068
I personally like the colors in the first version more (especially the greens), so maybe just stay with the first version. The exposure on it is still fine but my personal preference was for a slight bump in brightness.

>>4504069
>>4504071
The green was so fake and oversaturated, why would anyone like it, stop trolling

>>4504072
you're nuts man one looks like a nice landscape and the other is a crispy blue casted wasteland

File: 1775602504281918.jpg (404.6 KB)

404.6 KB JPG

>>4504068
Quick shitty edit of what I meant by a little bit of exposure. I bumped it by one stop and desaturated it just a little bit.

>>4504073
on the first pic you can only see the green, and on the second pic you can focus your attention on the beautiful mountains, they're dangerous and very big, like in Skyrim

>>4504035
First of all, crop it. Left and bottom of the picture way too busy and distracting.

>>4504068
Original photographer here, way too blue and the highlights in the clouds got blown out.

>>4504074
Closer to what I’ll probably end up with but still feels too blue.

>>4504077
I think the grass creates a visual path that leads you to the valley and helps you imagine exploring the mountains. That’s how I felt when I took the photo, the expectation of an adventure to follow.

File: 5741.jpg (3.3 MB)

3.3 MB JPG

>>4504015
OK boomer. Here's some more film scans for ya that had an AI mask or two applied to them.

File: 1775602504281918_01.jpg (678.6 KB)

678.6 KB JPG

>>4504081
How about this one?

File: Untitled 2.jpg (179.5 KB)

179.5 KB JPG

>>4504081
Problem is the white building in the middle of grass field imidiately leads the eye away from the picture. The left 3rd of the picture also more or less just distraction.

>>4504082
the virgin "underexpose for the sky or overexpose for the foreground" vs this chad right here "why not both"

>>4503435

What kind of shopping cart are those?

>>4503454

Love the monotone and postive and negative space. Good work!

>>4503543

Looks great to me, Love the overcast.

>>4503875

Felt like I've seen this wall paper before. Looks familar.

>>4503978
>>4503978

Prefer it without the brigtness adjustment. Sets the mood better.

>>4504127

Know a guy who could always win one before he passed away.

>>4504011

Love the close up with the deph of field and no HDR. Plenty of detail. Good job!

File: 000014420010.jpg (3.2 MB)

3.2 MB JPG

>>4504120
Great framing. Nice tones too, looks like slide film.

File: DSCF0490-copy.jpg (4.2 MB)

4.2 MB JPG

>>4504135
thanks! ive been trying to make the saturation my bitch for a looong time, the slide film look is very much my goal (dont want to end up on the ken rockwell side of things lol)

>>4504127
they're robot delivery vehicles

File: IMG_0010.jpg (3.4 MB)

3.4 MB JPG

>>4504142
>>4504120
I like the colors here. nice

File: 253.jpg (3.4 MB)

3.4 MB JPG

Took this one with my phone yesterday. Best shot by far. Looked up and there it was

>>4503540
Nice one

File: IMG_6369.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4504135
Love the colors in this one

>>4504084
Nice

>>4503900
This is my favorite of the 3

>>4504256
What phone?

>>4504268
Samsung S23

>>4504274
Fuck, was considering upgrading my a33 i got for free but even flagships do this retarded alteration to photos. I was more happy with pixels than this unnatural looking pics

File: IMGP0916.jpg (1.3 MB)

1.3 MB JPG

>>4504120
>>4504142
>>4504276
these look great assuming its the same anon, whats the setup? lens looks so sharp

>>4504287
I’m only the last one you replied to.
It’s actually a Fujifilm x20. I mostly shoot film now but the Fuji is small enough to throw in my bag without having to think.

>>4504287
cheers, i posted the first two shots linked - its x100v, camera raw denoise (it helps with the worms, raw detail on its own introduces weird artifacts), add some grain to get the texture back and sharpen after downscaling

File: Untitled-1 copy.jpg (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB JPG

>>4504246
thanks! i look at slide scans way too much so... glad someone likes it lol

>>4504287
btw, you would be surprised with how much detail you can get by using just a bit of sharpening when you resize for web - i know that its a touchy subject for some but...
(overdid it on this one a bit, but sub-pixel smart sharpening set to lens blur can make the image pop. damn i sound like ken)

>>4504311
wtf is it?

>>4504275
That is quite a sperged out version of saying your photo sucks.

>>4504330
No. I m saying that there is no reason to buy a flagship samsung if photos turn out like this. I ll keep my phone until it dies then get another midrange one

>>4504288
damn 12mp never looked so good

>>4504292
i could never get on with my x100 but looks like it was worth learning
>>4504296
ive never touched smart sharpening and i dont tend to spend long on edits but this is impressive, originally i was just messing around with a new lens and a 100% ish crop, appreciate it

>>4504348
>i could never get on with my x100
i totally understand. i am not the biggest fan of the camera either, but imo theres just nothing in the price range that compares for walks or this sort of "slow paced" street photos (pocketabilty, viewfinder, dust/wr)

>have a lot of shit photos
>start croping them
>suddenly they look good
don't delete your photos bros, even if your original pic is shit maybe there's something else you can't see rn

>>4504389
I kinda liked the thumbnail a little better, had a painterly quality to it.

File: 37610020-2.jpg (229.2 KB)

229.2 KB JPG

got some of my first film photos back recently. fucked up pretty badly with the 1st roll. Only 1/3 were usable. But I'm pretty happy with what I got.

File: 37610018.jpg (561.8 KB)

561.8 KB JPG

>>4504393

>>4504393
>>4504394
Looks comfy, what film stock?

I'm just starting with film and I'll probably fuck up too. I hear that the first half dozen rolls always suck, so don't take it too hard.

File: IMG_9737.jpg (2.1 MB)

2.1 MB JPG

>>4504425
Looks like he’s about ready to bite me, right?

Nope, just stifling a sneeze in a very smoky temple

File: IMG_9738.jpg (3 MB)

3 MB JPG

>>4504426

File: 37610001.jpg (680.4 KB)

680.4 KB JPG

>>4504416
portra 400. Got my second roll back today, had a much better exposure rate. All 36 were developed, but one came back burned and another accidentally became a double exposure.
This is from the first roll though.

I'm coming from a background in digital so the adjustment hasn't been too rough. In some ways its easier.

File: 41010004.jpg (590.7 KB)

590.7 KB JPG

>>4504431
Same location as >>4504394 looked better on the second roll.

>>4504431
>one came back burned and another accidentally became a double exposure.
Probably overcocking it a little. The first being half burned is also pretty typical, I've had a few like that too and it was always the first photo on the roll, but double exposure means you went too far and it whipped back.

>portra 400
I'll get some at some point, for now I've got a lot of expired Ultramax 400 from COVID to get through and some new rolls of Fuji 200.

>I'm coming from a background in digital so the adjustment hasn't been too rough. In some ways its easier.
Same. I think the issue for me isn't that I'm limited to 24 or 36 photos, but that in my mind I estimate how much each photo will cost me in dollars kek. I get the Fuji film pretty cheap but developing costs is where things get expensive, along with shipping my film since there are no film developers left in my city now.

>>4504432
Nice work, that's a pretty cool location. I really need to get out more and do some nature film photos.

post your photos I can edit and maybe even crop
I'm interested in how people see my edits

File: IMG_0831.jpg (3.9 MB)

3.9 MB JPG

>>4504434
>>4504435
cool

>>4504327
That's a "white-faced saki". I call them "Douche Monkeys". Hideous little things.

>>4504327
Indian Male

File: IMG_9746.jpg (3.4 MB)

3.4 MB JPG

>>4504590

5MB max file size? What is this, 1995?

>>4504616
This is why people mock those that say "phones are as good as cameras"

>>4504617
It’s actually a go-pro

Is it that bad?

>>4504621
Pretty bad, sorry anon. The perspective is warped, the shutter speed was way too slow and the ISO denoise is horrific. If you're going to use it for photos, only use it in daylight. They're just really not made for taking photos at all.

>>4504626
It’s what I had atm, and sometimes you just gotta make due

Regardless of the noise and perspective issues, I rather enjoy this picture all the same

File: DSCF0039.jpg (1020.9 KB)

1020.9 KB JPG

>>4504636
>make due
never seen this spelling before. it seems more sensical to me than 'do' but upon reference, it appears that 'due' has been phased out

>>4504639
Get a life

File: IMG_3629.jpg (2.2 MB)

2.2 MB JPG

pre-dawn, high ISO, but Mr. Fox got the squirrel and I got a shot. There's noise, but what can you do. Sun wasn't up.

File: ADB_9961.jpg (269.8 KB)

269.8 KB JPG

Canada Goose at sunrise.
Nikon D750 and Nikon 28-300mm 3.5-5.6
1/800, f/7.1, ISO 100, 230mm

File: IMGP1606.jpg (424.4 KB)

424.4 KB JPG

Tried to catch the reflection... 400 1/250 f/5.6

>>4504650
Lovely mood
>>4504638
Cool light!

>>4504590
Fun decoration

>>4504576
Cool lines but the colours are almost nauseating ngl, did you try monochrome

>>4504426
dawg

File: 1776011968376540_01.jpg (590 KB)

590 KB JPG

>>4504678
better?

>>4504706
the skin tones fell odd

>>4504709
feel*

File: Z6P_2543.jpg (1.3 MB)

1.3 MB JPG

>>4504709
Bit larger than life, perhaps, but I thought it fit.

File: DSC02284_01.jpg (2.9 MB)

2.9 MB JPG

is this too dark or is it just me?

File: IMG_0691.jpg (3.7 MB)

3.7 MB JPG

>>4504721
>>4504714
>>4504706
>>4504705
>>4504638
nice!

File: Z6P_2233.jpg (2.7 MB)

2.7 MB JPG

>>4504731
Back at you!

>>4500396
>chemtrails
5 seconds in Photoshop.

>>4504736
>no photo

>>4504636
I think it's a good photo too, but it suffers from the noted issues. With a better camera, you would've had some true kino that you could print off for your collection.

File: IMG_20260414_021801675_HDR.jpg (2.7 MB)

2.7 MB JPG

>>4503435

File: IMG_20260414_022850361.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4504915

File: IMG_20260414_023349921.jpg (934.1 KB)

934.1 KB JPG

>>4504917

File: IMG_9760.jpg (4.3 MB)

4.3 MB JPG

Oracle at Delphi

>>4504951
Neat!

File: 08wid27kv9vg1.jpg (303 KB)

303 KB JPG

name at least one world famous photo that is not a portrait

inb4: space pictures

>>4505044
The Windows XP wallpaper Bliss, which is considered to be the most famous and most viewed photo of all time.

File: losko.ru-c371b04d53ff1e456f557fa7a96f3063-1660x1049.jpg (228.4 KB)

228.4 KB JPG

>>4505046
well yeah but It was known because of the XP alone, I meant to ask what are some non-portrait photos that are famous because they're great

For some reason you can't make a great photo without a person in it, or animal, or stars/plantes. It's almost like everything else doesn't matter.

>>4505074
>For some reason you can't make a great photo without a person in it, or animal, or stars/[planets].
Not entirely true. I distinctly remember the photo that Dutch guy (no, nobody gives a fuck about the guy who took the photo, EVER) of a road and treeline where he made it look like two seperate photos. Pure landscape photo, but because he did something interesting it sticks with me.

Nobody ever EVER gives a single flying fuck about the person who took the photo. Without looking it up there is a 0.05% chance any anon here knows the name of the guy who took the Bliss photo.

>>4505044
Iwo Jima flag rasing, it's not a portrait and it's even a reshoot

>>4505044
Winter Sunrise, Sierra Nevada, from Lone Pine, California, 1944.

File: DSC_0144.jpg (2.5 MB)

2.5 MB JPG

>trees
Yes

>>4505088
>Iwo Jima flag
I also asked AI bro, but there are people so it doesn't count, without those people It would be just a flag

>>4505091
It is a good photo, I guess, but I've never heard of it before so yeah - not as famous as the Afghan girl for example

New thread:
>>4505100
>>4505100
>>4505100

>>4505097
"I've never heard of Kanye West so how can he be famous?" retarded ass reply

>>4505095
>There are people in the photo so it's a portrait
I know this is bad bait to begin with but at least put in some effort

>>4505074
>I meant to ask what are some non-portrait photos that are famous because they're great
Hindenburg maybe? Or the Lochness Monster? The thing that makes pretty much every photo great or famous is the story they tell and that always involves people or some event unfolding (such as the first photo of the moon in space because it's the very first).

>>4505107
I love Kanye West, he is famous.

The Afghan girl = Kanye
Winter Sunrise, Sierra Nevada = his Pablo merch