/p/ - Thread 4503466

Anonymous
Kodachrome 04/04/26(Sat)09:05:37 No.4503466

Kodachrome Anonymous 04/04/26(Sat)09:05:37 No.4503466 [Reply]▶

We know that original Kodachrome isnt coming back due to the toxic chemicals used in developing rolls, but why arent Kodak or any other film manufacturer creating a new film stock that looks like Kodachrome? Is it really impossible to create other film stocks than these hazy yellow tinted pissy stocks available now?

Ektar is way too red, Portra and Gold too yellow, Ektachrome too blue and so forth.

Deep black shadows, punchy reds and yellows, good contrast, perfect blues, lots of black in all colors. No weird general color tint.

If a Kodachrome copy was launched it would be a fucking goldmine $$ for Kodak or whomever launched it.

21 RepliesView Thread

Showing all 21 replies.

Anonymous
04/04/26(Sat)09:16:02 No.4503470

Anonymous 04/04/26(Sat)09:16:02 No.4503470▶

>>4503466
Who cares
you fix it in post anyways.

Anonymous
04/04/26(Sat)11:02:31 No.4503475

Anonymous 04/04/26(Sat)11:02:31 No.4503475▶

https://nikonpc.com/

here

Anonymous
04/07/26(Tue)10:02:49 No.4503943

Anonymous 04/07/26(Tue)10:02:49 No.4503943▶

File: 3ee0f25e48a6c10d-photo.jpg (189.4 KB)

189.4 KB JPG

>>4503466
I agree. Just bring back the OG.

Anonymous
04/07/26(Tue)18:28:10 No.4504004

Anonymous 04/07/26(Tue)18:28:10 No.4504004▶

Buncha zoomers in this thread not realizing Kodachrome was absolute ass compared to modern e6

Anonymous
04/07/26(Tue)18:54:06 No.4504006

Anonymous 04/07/26(Tue)18:54:06 No.4504006▶

this shit again?
>>4487920

Anonymous
04/08/26(Wed)07:05:58 No.4504085

Anonymous 04/08/26(Wed)07:05:58 No.4504085▶

File: IMAG0264.jpg (4.5 MB)

4.5 MB JPG

Anonymous
04/10/26(Fri)22:05:34 No.4504411

Anonymous 04/10/26(Fri)22:05:34 No.4504411▶

>>4504004
In terms of what? Speed/ISO and dynamic range? Yeah but Kodachrome still looks ten times better because its colors are superior.

Anonymous
04/10/26(Fri)22:15:07 No.4504412

Anonymous 04/10/26(Fri)22:15:07 No.4504412▶

File: ekta.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4504411
ektachrome can look close enough, and honestly - it wouldnt matter nowadays, everyone edits their photos...

Anonymous
04/10/26(Fri)22:27:02 No.4504413

Anonymous 04/10/26(Fri)22:27:02 No.4504413▶

File: films.jpg (2.3 MB)

2.3 MB JPG

>>4504411
two are ektachrome, two are kodachrome, good luck.
shot around 1980, so it should be E6, but i am definitely not ready to talk about the differences between "old" and "new" ektachrome, so, take this experiment with a grain of salt

Anonymous
04/10/26(Fri)23:45:25 No.4504415

Anonymous 04/10/26(Fri)23:45:25 No.4504415▶