>>4504611
Could you post some examples

>>4504611
because of the red circle badge duh. Photos like most art in general are all about context of the creator, the tool they used, and subject matter last. It's why for instance, a frail violinist that can barely hold their stradivarius up from their wheelchair will still earn far more recognition and applause than any healthy nonamer with noname instrument playing 10/10 in a blind test.

>>4504611
>still produces more appealing images than any modern compact camera
>only picture posted is of the camera
Interesting

>>4504623
>>4504659
Do you need to be spoonfed everything? Try using google maybe

>>4504671
Nta but I googled and all the pictures suck donkey balls, you were wrong anon sorry its not a good camera after all and leica failed. Luckily I did my own rrsearch here. I can also vouch for this info for other anons so you dont need to google

>>4504671
You made a thread with a grand claim without providing examples.
You made a shitpost.

>>4504676
Of course he did, stop giving him attention.

File: 1763907671564768.jpg (7.7 KB)

7.7 KB JPG

>>4504611
>be OP
>be 39 years old
>still produces useless shitpost-tier threads on an Albanian Beetroot Growers forum

>>4504611
It doesnt

Alan schaller or whatever for example uses a leica to produce some of the most dogshit photographs. I would rather go to a gallery shot by /p/‘s own huskyfag and doghair sharing a sony a7iii.

>>4504700
Oh wait thats the d-lux

Yeah that one sucks shit too. Looks like phone photos.

File: 001.jpg (702.8 KB)

702.8 KB JPG

>>4504700
>>4504701
>yeah it sucks because um... it just does OKAY
Why do Leicas always attract these retarded contrarian opinions?
Don't worry anon, I'm sure there's a recipe for your X100 that looks just as good!

>>4504611
Its just a rebadged panny LX

>leicaman thread
>no photos
Its been memed to death and still true every time

>>4504611
That is not the Ricoh GR Digital (2008)

>>4504847
It's like poetry it rhymes