Anonymous
Ansel Adams Trust condemns unauthorised AI colourised work 06/04/26(Thu)22:37:53 No. 4512754
Ansel Adams Trust condemns unauthorised AI colourised work 06/04/26(Thu)22:37:53 No. 4512754
Ansel Adams Trust condemns unauthorised AI colourised work Anonymous
06/04/26(Thu)22:37:53
No.
4512754
[Reply]
►
File: IMG_6354.jpg (771.2 KB)
(�/�c��X�� � $�}��w�Nr|�7T�v����xN���Z��]Ί��ԣ�3 ��I��*'0!���do�G��f��9����D4��k�����y������N�ZtϦ7�V�3ߢ)�[�z��Vk[��`��f�� �|6��� O��� L�Ϸ���K���l@�w���.^ ],�-�K8�7��4�&jT�*�Z"�J�� ���xj�`n �`�wv뚂 T.z��-R<*�������Z2 �Z*^��Ԃ�ΜK>�'�8,��U"������5� ��Z�"��N>_���BP�e��#�^kT�ð��B�n�~/�:[��x�����{�
r�ulу����'Z��Z�q����P�5����a�0pW�ICZ�l -��4�x�Hc���� #�-�7�2#i:U)P�"հ�<1��(�pl�tr����� Iֵ� �����Z��ο��J��魅2�k%; �Y �����;�G�͐��S����=��@� �m.̥u�f����գ��6b W_��跬'�G.�7&<0�}~��i��� ����N�y��_��GRV�b|3�W�� ��ӕ9�:"�$�ljP����� �~P�q�^�[���&�Z'T9y �Q+Hq|T*�ֳ�[�y0�֫}oP�_Q�.u� �h�Df��CA\�Y��w��_r
Showing all 11 replies.
>>
>>
>>
>>4512754
> The work was offered for sale at the art fair in three differently sized editions of ten—for $6,000, $8,000 and $10,000. (The Ansel Adams Gallery, run by the artist’s grandson, offers prints of Moonrise for over $100,000.)
lmao. who cares. the subjective nature of art (especially photo) means it will always be perverted by people looking to fill their pockets. they should have ken rockwell'd it some more while they were at it.
>>
>>
>>4512794
>The Ansel Adams Gallery, run by the artist’s grandson, offers prints of Moonrise for over $100,000.
>paying that much for a copy of someone else's photo
I understand wanting to protect the integrity of art through rights and pricing structures but surely there's a point where it just becomes greed? $100k isn't exactly an accessible price point.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>