Monarchy as a system of government is super-stable. The problems begin when the aristocrats under the monarch have too much autonomy, and/or the leadership becomes generationally corrupt or incompetent. Because remember, there's no way to remove them.

Democracy works just fine on small scales, like with cities. But on the national stage, democracy is shit.

Monarchy is based until the king goes bad.
We've had 3 good kings in a row. Now it's getting bad.

>>533313761
Monarchy is the best government. Proper hierarchy.

Left wing governments are satanic inversions of hierarchy. They pretend that people can rule over government but that is a lie. Government always rules over people. When you invert hierarchy like that criminals get treated better than the law abiding. Leeches get treated better than taxpayers. Foreigners get treated better than citizens. Everything wicked in this world is caused by left wing inversion.

Leftism is evil. It is a lie. To buy into "equality" is to sell your soul to satan. You can't tear down a monarch without the ones below you tearing you down.

>>533313853
>there's no way to remove them
Monarchs are the most removable form of government. The error comes when you abolish the monarchy instead of replacing the royals with a cadet branch.

Try removing democracy. It is impervious to the will of the people. You can vote for 100 years to get less immigration and yet you get more of it. You can vote for 100 years to get less taxation and yet you get more of it. You can't get rid of it. You can't depose it. You can't replace it with anything better.

Good to see some fellow based monarchy enjoyers

>>533314125
naxis

File: 1758822901726003.jpg (147.8 KB)

147.8 KB JPG

>>533313761
>wants to be a peasant
Fucking pathetic.

File: Screenshot 2026-04-16 at 11-40-53 (420) Expat the Explorer - YouTube.png (108.4 KB)

108.4 KB PNG

monarchy has always worked best
rome
nazi
carthage
phonecians
greece
egypt
modern sercret jew king mess is aberration
women in biz and gov and law? lolz

>>533314442
shalome

>>533314442
You're a peasant right now dummy.

File: ED-Briefs-chabad.jpg (91.8 KB)

91.8 KB JPG

>>533314479
Yeah I got better digits. Dont cry about it MIGA.

>>533314442
Shalom rabi, how's iron dome working today?

File: 8114ceb11346fa4e7e3abbdd6fbb35b4.jpg (181.9 KB)

181.9 KB JPG

>>533313761
>Monarchy is based
If I am the monarch, yes.

>>533314125
>Monarchs are the most removable form of government.
Not without a civil war, it isn't. Study any country's history that had a monarchy. You can have an incompetent ruler surrounded by competent puppeteers. Then you have to have a civil war to get rid of them.

Democracies don't have civil wars, but they also don't solve any problems and are easily controlled by anyone with money.

I just think an ethnic autocracy is generally going to be better, since it's the pluses of monarchy but without the faults of democracy.

monarchy is based until everyone wants to be the monarch and after a few thousand years of bloodshed we arrive at china with one idiot monarch at the top and billions of yesman bugs below. infact china could only have done it because their massive rice fields can support the common tactic of throwing more men at the battle than their enemy. if you still want a dynamic, creative society then "primus inter pares" should be the highest form of seniority.

IMPERIALISM, on the other hand, is based and redpilled

>>533313761
You should know better. Your post is extremely short-sighted.

A king has no loyalty to a nation. A king only has loyalty to their dynasty and furthering their dynasty. They can and will attempt to invite foreigners to serve political office, in the military and the personal guard (Varangians for instance), especially if the King is a foreigner (several cases such as in Russia where a German family ruled over the nation). Even if you have a based king who does have loyalty to the nation there is no guarantee that his son will and that his son won't change his stance and try to replace his subjects. King Charles III and Queen Elizabeth II for instance are (were in the former) both quite active in supporting the importation of foreigners. The "commonwealth" project which opened the gates to jeets and caribbean niggers was Elizabeth's idea. This "based monarchy" is taking an active role in Jewish policy.
>>can kick out jews on the whim
Don't forget the part where the next king invites them back in to do banking as was often the case. Yes they were expelled by Kings. They were also invited in by kings.
>>currency backed by silver/gold
Doesn't require a King.
>>less welfare or none due to plebs not being able to vote
No one expected welfare then. Prior to the introduction of Socialism, the idea of welfare didn't even pop up in the US as standard policy until FDR.
>>much cheaper to sustain than current government made out of 500 or more politicians living like kings. Raping kids and eating their flesh.
Look into the French Revolution.
>>much cheaper to sustain than current government made out of 500 or more politicians living like kings. Raping kids and eating their flesh.
Look up "Prince Andrew, Epstein files."

>>533314946
When you study history you will notice that every civilization was built by monarchy.

No tribal people ever discovered democracy and became civilized.

Monarchy creates. Democracy destroys.

Civil wars are bad, actually. The only reason the monarch becomes ineffective is when the people become disloyal and he can't get rid of powerful merchants.

File: D3ffqudUwAErGHp.jpg (230.8 KB)

230.8 KB JPG

>>533314864
Ask a MIGA, not me. As soon to be peasants... american citizens and the general populace has no say in such things as war, bitchwaffle magat.

>>533313761
Look at how king charles is single handedly gonna end the bong monarchy to see just how based it is.

File: spots-huge-error-pricing-weight-120276851.jpg (147.6 KB)

147.6 KB JPG

In monarchy you get a "baker's dozen" (13) because the baker doesn't want to be hanged for accidentally ripping someone off.

In democracy megacorporations routinely rip you off and the worst punishment they can ever face is a small fine less than the amount they stole.

>>533314973
Plot twist monarchy without passing the power on kids.
Next king is simply free willing with clear deal he accepts death in case of fucking up.

>>533315144
Parliament is sovereign in the UK. The monarchy was great when it had power.

The leftist brainworms always blame the monarch even after he lost power. Just goes to show that monarchy is the most accountable form of government. He gets blamed for things he has no power over and that you did yourself via democracy.

>>533315238
Hereditary monarchy is obviously the best.

You can breed humans for leadership just like you can breed chickens to lay eggs.

Our ancestors cared deeply about blood lines because they were smarter than us.

>>533313761
i'll attest monarchy is the only natural form of governance by virtue that its the only one an average human can relate to or understand without first undergoing several decades of education. This is the case as it mimics and models itself after the family relation, the peasent understands the ruler through his place in his own family.

For this reason alone i've come to be philisophically a monarchist. Not because i like the idea of monarchy, but because its the only ones humans can really relate to and understand. Even with high education rates, the populace calls its public servants its 'leaders' and they treat political dynasties and tech companies like the royalty of old. Its just a natural human reflex given the model of the family- for what is a kingdom if not a forest of familes

>>533315063
>he only reason the monarch becomes ineffective is when the people become disloyal and he can't get rid of powerful merchants.
Or when they're incompetent.
Or when they enter bad alliances.
Or when they abjure too much power to underlings.
Or when they're inbred.
Or when they're given to vice.
Or when they're a war monger.

The best kings were only administrators.

>>533313761
stfu yokel

monarchy is just a way to sugarcoat neonazism
the skinheads were too easy for the regime to prosecute, but if you dress the same people aristocratically, the regime cant do shit

>>533314965
>monarchy is based until everyone wants to be the monarch and after a few thousand years of bloodshed we arrive at china
monarchism is cool until you have to kill 20% of the population on the 20th war of succession

democracy is a White man's form of government, civil and with a way to find a successor that doesnt involve murder

>>533315238
>without passing the power on kids.
Look at Visigoth Spain. They had all the problems I brought up with no hereditary power. In fact the Kingdom went back and forth on its policy on the Jews every King. Succession determined not by heredity also had the side effect of giving any nobleman who wanted to be King this year the ability to become King by frocking the current one or killing him and just getting enough military support that you can't be challenged... well until the next guy decides he wants to be king. And this problem occurred in both hereditary and non-hereditary monarchies. The difference is that John Smith or Theodore Rosenhaus couldn't just take power in the hereditary case without doing a lot of work to at least fabricate some relation to the previous monarch.
>>533315277
>You can breed humans for leadership just like you can breed chickens to lay eggs.
You really can't. Keep in mind that the two millennia of breeding Kings lead to incompetent kings like Tsar Nicholi II who pretty much destroyed his monarchy by getting into a big war while having incompetent advisors appointed because they told him war stories he liked. The same such advisors who recommend equipping men with axes to fight a modern war. Did I mention their "breeding for leadership" lead to hemophilia becoming prevalent in their lines?

>>533315578
Democracy through the process of evolution breeds the most evil government possible. Like repeatedly taking an antibiotic that only kills good bacteria.

Democracies have higher taxes than monarchies and are making White people pay for their own extermination.

>>533315816
Large centralized powers regardless of the form of government tend to be the source of the evil in the first place. Civilization and the necessary dissolution of the strong tribal ties and tribal identities which was the norm for the vast majority of human history in favor of arbitrary nationalities is perhaps the greatest issue.
>have higher taxes than monarchies
Look into taxation in the Kingdom of Denmark (highest tax rates in Europe). Prior to the introduction of the income tax in the USA (not a monarchy), one often only had to earn a few days wages to pay their taxes. High tax rates are not a result or deposing monarchs. It is a result of modern welfare schemes which generally did not exist until after the Industrial Revolution. The issue of taxation is not related to form of government but to specific late 19th and early 20th century political movements and ideologies. It's mostly a socialist and communist thing. High tax rates to fund welfare. High tax rates as a hedge against inflation using debt-based currency. High tax rates to run nationalized industries. It's more accurate to just say tax rates used to be lower.

>>533315663
>New king tries to bring jews back.
>everyone knows about this treason within few days due to the internet.
Yea anon. Comparing times where info spread with month delay is not optimal

>>533316656
No. Centralized power is good. A shepherd has power over sheep and he uses it to protect them from wolves.

Distributed power is totalitarianism. When everyone has access to power they will take your kids and trans them and you won't be able to do anything about it because there is no single person who can be removed to stop it.

Real world obvious proof is the levels of taxation. Monarchies have lower taxes. Slaves in ancient Egypt were only taxed 20%. Centralizing power creates accountability.

Monarchy is having a shepherd. Democracy is being eaten by wolves.

Go to bed Mouldbug

File: 20221101-103620-L-1920x1303we.jpg (146 KB)

146 KB JPG

>>533316656
>taxation in the Kingdom of Denmark
Wait, lol. Are you calling modern day Denmark a kingdom? Lmao.

Democracy believers are mentally retarded.

>>533316842
>A shepherd has power over sheep and he uses it to protect them from wolves.
The shephard keeps the sheep entirely to fleece them or to eat them much like you are SUBJECTS (that is livestock) to a king. You are nothing but a source of wealth, labor, and soldiers to them.
>Real world obvious proof is the levels of taxation. Monarchies have lower taxes. Slaves in ancient Egypt were only taxed 20%.
In 1862 the tax bracket for an American was around 5%. Again this is a false correlation. Monarchy has nothing to do with it. It's simply the reality that older governments did not have all these welfare programs or agencies which it uses as part of its CENTRALIZING OF POWER as governments have been CENTRALIZING POWER for at least the last two centuries.
https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/historical-income-tax-rates-brackets/
> 20%
So around Estonia's tax rates?
>Centralizing power creates accountability.
No. It doesn't. The king is responsible when he wins. But it is a subordinate who's at fault when something bad happens. CENTRALIZING POWER ONLY MAKES IT EASIER FOR THE SHEEP TO GET FLEECED.
>>533316945
Denmark is still a Kingdom like Norway and Britain. Also, I'm not a Democracy believer.
>>533316740
The new king brings the Jews back while starting a war in Iran to spam the news cycle with the war to take attention off the Jews. Moreover it was still an older King that INVITED THE JEWS long before they were expelled.

You're all single issue historical illiterates and midwits.

>>533317355
Shepherds protect their sheep from wolves precisely because sheep are valuable. This is a good thing for the sheep.

Monarchs protect White people precisely because White people are valuable. This is a good thing for White people.

Democracy is currently exterminating Whites. The only thing leftism values is destruction.

This thread is autosaging, proving that monarchy is the only threat to our current rulers.

>>533313761
There's a old saying in Italy: "Better the monarchy, in case you need to kill only one."

>>533313853
>The problems begin when the aristocrats under the monarch have too much autonomy, and/or the leadership becomes generationally corrupt or incompetent
Polish-Lithuanian Common Wealth in a nutshell

>>533318329
Monarchy is like a reverse panopticon. All eyes are on the monarch and he is held responsible for everything that goes wrong. It creates a strong incentive for good leadership.

The only problem is when people abolish monarchy instead of replacing the monarch.