Thread #533335221
Anonymous
Why don't Western leaders need religious approval before making decisions like MENAs do? 04/17/26(Fri)17:56:41 No.533335221
Why don't Western leaders need religious approval before making decisions like MENAs do? 04/17/26(Fri)17:56:41 No.533335221
Why don't Western leaders need religious approval before making decisions like MENAs do? Anonymous 04/17/26(Fri)17:56:41 No.533335221 [Reply]▶
File: 108934729338773110618.webm (2 MB)
2 MB WEBM
When Trump wants to do something he doesn't go and check it over with the Christian leaders in America first for their approval he just goes ahead and does it. Likewise nobody in England, France, Germany etc is going to get a statement from a bishop or a priest to confirm a political decision.
The president of Iran or the Prime Minister of Iraq cannot just bring in a policy concerning schools or education or public health without a Shia Marja signing it off.
Even in Muslim countries where the rulership is viewed as secular such as Jordan or Egypt, any big political decision needs to be signed off by an Islamic authority or the public will go apeshit.
Even Netanyahu in Israel has to have Rabbinical input and have a Rabbi visible signing off anything he does and giving the public confidence that religious approval is behind it.
In the Middle East you simply HAVE to have some religious input in every decision the country makes. But in the West the religious leaders are ignored.
5 RepliesView Thread
Showing all 5 replies.>>
>>533335221
Well see, once upon a time, Catholics were a bunch of seething idiots that let their religious figures do a bunch of fake and gay bullshit.
So, people dropped that nigger nonsense and became protestants. It left them paying all the indulgences to keep people from burning as long in purgatory-hell or whatever idiotic shit they think, and it knowing everyone else gets a free ride while they pay like a cuck, it really puckered their assholes.
Oh well. So anyway after Catholics started being degenerates, it basically knocked the legs out of a huge amount of their power, and people stopped caring nearly as much about the Church when it comes to secular governmental measures.
So, that's the reason why. They got too cocky. If a bunch of dumb piles of shit way back in the day before industry hasn't came down with an insatiable case of Jew-greed for extra shekels, well people wouldn't have stopped respecting them and they'd still have core real tangible social power instead of just influential sway.
But alas, they lusted for the coin.
People who disagree are butthurt Catholics that need to indulge in a little fart sniffing elsewhere. Maybe in a Mestizo buttcrack.
>>
File: 1763612860618768.jpg (238.9 KB)
238.9 KB JPG
>>533335221
I would be fine with this if Christianity became pro-White. As it is now it is pro-Non-white.
>>
>>533335221
>In the Middle East you simply HAVE to have some religious input in every decision the country makes. But in the West the religious leaders are ignored.
Maybe that's why your western world is fucking ruined
>>
>>
>>533335221
>But in the West the religious leaders are ignored.
We have it explicitly written into the US Constitution that we're not allowed to make laws which "respect an establishment of religion". Laws of a nature like "everyone must participate in a student-led prayer in schools" or "no one may work on the Sabbath" are null and void the second they are written down. Naturally, no one has any reason to consult religious leaders.
There's also a question of what religious leaders we'd even consult. Christianity has a lot of denominations, and no one's going to take orders from someone who has a different denomination than them. Why should a Protestant listen to the Pope? Why should a Catholic listen to Evangelical leaders?