Sooo are you going to post 6 or what

I see you are summoning the wifepoters

File: 1000008819.jpg (73.1 KB)

73.1 KB JPG

>>22359340
No, that is NOT going to happen. Wife posting is verboten.

File: 1000007352.jpg (196 KB)

196 KB JPG

>>22359345
Relax, real life shit happens.

File: 1978425552.jpg (963.3 KB)

963.3 KB JPG

>>22359343
Oh it will happen. This board has its dedicated wifeposters.

File: 18454885848.jpg (1.9 MB)

1.9 MB JPG

>>22359337

>>22359451
Wifeposters disgust me.

File: absolute-goddess-3fhp2qjdu2-617x1080.jpg (81.3 KB)

81.3 KB JPG

The queen Ellana

Man the harpoons, the shitting of the thread has started.

very hot

>>22359337
I certainly hope everyone's contributions are good enough for you.

File: 1000007077.jpg (3.8 MB)

3.8 MB JPG

>>22359725
>>22359726
A bit too fat for my tastes, but her face is pretty. This is borderline objectively ugly though. Any fatter and you WILL be banned.

File: 750022474.jpg (95.7 KB)

95.7 KB JPG

>>22359834
Naah, they'll just keep posting uglier until the thread has 130 images of 60 year old fat sacks.

"Wife! Who wants more?"

>>22359337
So the first thing OP does is post a woman ugly as fuck! Even her titties are lumpy.....You need better taste OP, especially if you're going to advocate for beauty!

>>22359337
Most these women are ugly as fuck, OP you need better standards as the mongoloid you posted is the worst offender. She looks like the inbreeding of a brother and sister

>>22360277
stfu, face is fucked for sure, but them tits are top notch

File: 2042521468.jpg (599.4 KB)

599.4 KB JPG

And so the flamewar begins.
Not the OP but seems I am almost the only one contributing.

File: 64585.jpg (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB JPG

>>22360276

File: 64586.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

>>22360300

File: 64587.jpg (1.1 MB)

1.1 MB JPG

more?

>>22359337
OP, your post is of a sloth, she's gross, might want to get better standards before you preach Beautiful!

>>22361026
/lgbt/ threads are that way --->

>>22361030
AI slop

>>22361030
fuck off ai fag

>>22360277
>>22360278
I swear the "beautiful" threads purposefully post objectively ugly women

>>22361070
Good thing I'm not a fag like you, I've never been there like you...just because you like ugly women, doesn't mean real men do. So go ahead and hope back on over to your beloved /lgbt/ thread before you see a scary vagina.

>>22361474
Indeed, as I said, beauty is subjective but purposely posting a woman that looks like a sloth is just stupid and shows very low standards.

Prime example is this fag >>22361070

>>22360300
>>22360303
>>22360276
who is she? amazing

File: 45647.jpg (2.6 MB)

2.6 MB JPG

>>22361517
a girl I used to know

Actual high quality thread

>>22359725
Since when was "queen" a euphemism for "Fat Kunt"

that’s a picture of reviewbrah with photoshopped tits, fag

>>22361505
>>22361507
You will never be real men.

My wife is objectively hotter than any of the slags posted so far, and none of you deserve to see her.

very hot

>>22365530
Thread is getting better, but she wins it

I don't think you know what "objectively" means.

>>22359727
Harpoons man'd sir but I think were too late, for there she blows and me harpoons dull!

>>22359728
Most fat chicks are!

>>22365899
You can't even define what a man is, much less judge others......MEN do not go after fat ugly females like you do simp, keep after the fat ugly ones kiddo!

>>22365901
Some of us do anon, sadly the fat simping retards like>>22365899 ruin it for everyone else...*sighs*

File: IMG_3019.jpg (274.8 KB)

274.8 KB JPG

>>22359344
Good choice!

>>22361533
A man needs a name.

>>22366279
literally perfect

>>22360277
>>22360278
>>22361026
>>22361474
>>22361505
>>22361507
Nice try, trannies. Now go dilate before you hang yourself.

>>22368399
>trannies out of nowhere
>in a sexy beautiful women board
Gr8 b8 8/8 and the rest don't skate.

>>22360277
She's cute, that's just a bad angle

File: RPReplay_Final1670959173.mov (1).webm (763.5 KB)

763.5 KB WEBM

just sayin, "objective" beauty should mean it's enough to make an A-list celebrity cheat or at the very least be hotter than sydney sweeney. otherwise it's just your opinion bros

>>22369790
Just saying, you don't know what "objectively" means.

File: 676d5f45e576b195c8eb29685d940f0c502f60d4d65a2b72.jpg (86.9 KB)

86.9 KB JPG

>>22369847
that's fair. i thought to use "mean" to make relevant a simple principle to discern high qualitative levels of beauty from the rest. you could shed more light or even propose a more objective measure to help us all.

File: 789433A3-7652-4E32-9A4D-668C630A480C.jpg (85.5 KB)

85.5 KB JPG

My bitch

>>22359337
This woman is a true goddess. I'd fuck her just to breed her

>>22359348
I would not be able to keep myself from going behind and down for a sniff between her cheeks

>>22371071
moar

>>22366158
It apparently means “butterface” to 40% of anons posting ITT

>>22366758
moar

>ITT we only post objectively BEAUTIFUL women.
>posts a big breasted uggo lizard
mmmmm

>>22382932
why is the paper so high?

>>22380137
As usual, the woman in these threads tend to not be any be any better than the run of the mill for this board ... except for this one picture. Oh my! Sexy body, perfect breasts (too big is as bad as too small), the planes of her face, her hair! Would!

And she triggers my women in coveralls fetish. :)

File: sexxxxxy_mdl_32172.png (602 KB)

602 KB PNG

>>22359337

>>22366758
Def want more of her

>>22359337
>only post objectively beautiful women
>starts with Igor

File: topless-carmen-g6fDlC.jpg (235 KB)

235 KB JPG

>>22361026
you must be a fag. this is a different picture of the whore you're calling an ugly sloth with lumpy tits. beauty is in the eye of the beholder, sure, but you must be fucking blind or gay as fuck if you think she's ugly.

>whines about pic quality being low in most threads
>makes an average as fuck thread, same as all the others
a tale as old as time

>>22359337
Shit taste.

>>22360222
Is the Apple talking to her?

>>22391859
Why does AI like to put so many necklaces?
>WYYYAAaaaaAHHH it's not AI!!!!
Yeah, look at the bendy arm floating off the table.

>Recycled 2000's-2010's sloptent

>>22392866
that's normal, it's a natural filtering system really, bad content gets left behind while only the best examples survive, you see it in all sorts of other contexts too like old music for example

File: 260324111153.webm (3.7 MB)

3.7 MB WEBM

>>22359337
Makoshake might have the best tits in the world

>>22395140
What if they're fake?

>>22395140
I'd put her on par with Wettmelon, yes, they're awesome

>>22359461
source? more?

File: 1766872256921516.jpg (3 MB)

3 MB JPG

>>22395140

>>22367117
Karolina Zganiacz / C_zga.model

>>22360248
Her face is bad a 5 at best

>>22395142
They're obviously natural.
It's easy to tell the difference.

>>22395160
I'm a different anon. I had to look up Wettmelon to compare but you're right, they're awesome and pretty much on par.
But to me Makoshake's are still that tiny bit better and absolutely perfect.

But they're both great and pretty much perfect. You have good taste, thanks for making me aware of Wettmelon.

>>22361533
does anyone have something more?

File: ###sft05968.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

There is no such thing as "objective" beauty, as beauty is inherently subjective, and objectivity isn't the sum total or correct version of subjectivity.

That said, I have no problem posting a bunch of classically beautiful women

>>22359337
>objectively BEAUTIFUL
Doesn't exist.

>>22359393
nice
got a name?

>>22360259
Sauce?

>>22400295
Sure it does, just not in your race!