>>16939306
Based af, that's all there is to say. Most of her haters are coping pop-sci faggots.

I like her most of the time, except for when she does the intellectually lazy but popular twitter hate mob stuff, such as acting like AI is doing nothing but plagiarism and harmful confirmation bias and no one should ever use it

>>16939323
>AI is doing nothing but plagiarism and harmful confirmation bias and no one should ever use it
it's true tho

>>16939323
Yeah, I think she understands the select uses of AI and let's it go without saying, but she also isn't wrong about it infesting academia.

>>16939326
I use chatbots a lot, but simply because they often give better results than search engines. Not because I want them to complement me or reinforce my preconceived notions, and I get annoyed and tell them to stop when they do

>>16939306
her takes on ayn rand were retarded if not indicative that she never even read the very literature she was talking about, which is a huge red flag considering shes supposed to be a phd candidate. by the way, even the outspoken feminists who interpreted her work had a much more nuanced understanding.

>>16939306
worthless opinion channel like millions of others, but with tits and a veneer of intellectualism.

>>16939306
I like her but she's wrong about a lot. So was I when I was 25. She reminds me of me quite a bit. I'm lucky YouTube wasn't a thing when I was 25 and all my retarded hot takes are just on the nsa email repository.

>>16939403
She's more like 38 years old I think

File: 1775059968140664.jpg (138.4 KB)

138.4 KB JPG

>>16939330
I never got the whole using ai as a therapist, using it to flatter you thing its literally just a tool you ask it to tell you what you need and cite the sources then you close the tab.

I have a feeling the people criticizing ai havent used the paid versions/haven't ever logged in to use the pro models and think theyre retarded when they can literally run code and use wolfram now.

Pseudo intellectual like every single Collier I've met.
Might be genetic.

>>16939312
The comments in this thread are increasingly verifying this.

>>16939306
She's yet another Math/Physics grad who hit the postdoc wall and is having an existential crisis.
Thankfully for her it seems like she found a way to make a living.

>>16939306
She's the only physics youtuber who I've seen speak mostly accurately about physics. Some of her other opinions are a little normgroidal but overall I quite like her. She triggers a lot of people on 4chen as you can see.

>>16939721
>speak mostly accurately about physics
you must be pretty retarded if you seriously believe that

I'm a truck driver and angela's videos really help me feel like im not wasting my life away.

>>16939750
Care to give me some examples?

>>16939306
physics phd, that's dr. collier to you

insufferable

File: F0100925-Father_spoon_feeding_baby_daughter.jpg (67.2 KB)

67.2 KB JPG

>>16939789

>>16940424
I can't read your mind to see what retarded physics larper ideas you have that lead to you getting triggered by collier's videos.

>duude i fucking love watching some fat bitch with beaver teeth ramble for an hour on shit she learned the day before for every video

File: 130169445910.jpg (6.9 KB)

6.9 KB JPG

>>16939306
Mid bitch who couldn't understand the principle behind a Dyson Sphere/Swarm so she thought it was a joke...

>>16939306
nudes?

>>16941682
Was just about to bring that one up too. She completely missed the point of a dyson swarm

>>16939306
shes a fucking 5

>>16939312
fpbp

>>16939306
The real redpill is that if you want to go into science but anything she says is surprising, you don't know enough. Of course humanoid robots are a fucking stupid idea if you think about it for more than two seconds and know the fist thing about batteries.

>>16942651
Lets say hypothetically you have a budget of $500.
A humanoid robot costs $500 but so do the washing machine, autopilot subscription for a year, dishwasher, housemaid service for a year, lawn maintenance and snow removal.

You could either get one those or get a humanoid robot for about the same price that can do all of them.

>>16939306
You know how she has like a um...a butthole..? I want to be like, really deep in it. Like all the way into her small intestine. Like sucking on it for hours sort of stuff. I-I'd eat whatever comes out of it too and I'd like it! Yeah. So those are my thoughts! :)

>>16939306
you can tell she wants to be a female hank green.

>>16943101
Do people still like that guy? I remember hearing about some kind of Tiktok controversy he got himself into.

>>16943103
yes he still gets millions of views explaining things with wikipedia level depth to normalfags.

>>16939306
Astro people are insufferable. See Neil de Grass Tyson.

>>16939312
she's the most popsci whore to get shilled into fame by the algorithm in a long time. Keep coping.

>>16939306
She's cute and I agreed with just about every point in her Star Trek video.

I don't care about anything else.

>>16939329
>it infesting academia
academia was infested long before "ai". maybe ai is a good gram stain

Good enough that I still watch her.

Although her outlook on anything that's even remotely adjacent to Elon Musk is retarded.
I hate Musk like the next guy, but she has absurd confidence in her takes - and her takes is always that new tech is futile and doesn't work.
She also sees Nazis unironically everywhere. Even random physicists are suspected fascists for using German words in their papers.

Another crazy bitch.

>>16939403
she's somewhere near the mid 30s

>>16939306
tows the line on rational and political shit until [insert thing] that goes outside her scope of ability to nuance hits her interest.
a small nitpick as example: her video on flouride.
Nobody disagrees that brushing your teeth is a good thing. But all she did was go on and on about enamel mineralization while, probably intentionally, ignoring any discussion on anything to do with flouride's other researched effects and why most other countries have banned it.

>>16943143
Dilate and seethe, pop-sci niggoid.

>>16939306
>Angela Collier
She likes black metal

>>16940509
I got triggered by her video about some dead scientist where she says we have to delete him from history because he was a womanizer or some shit

File: 1755203128745801.jpg (302.9 KB)

302.9 KB JPG

>>16943938
Irrelevant. We are talking about whether she speaks accurately about physics. Furthermore, if you're talking about the Feynman video, she didn't say that.

>>16943214
It's toes the line retard.

>>16939306
she owes me sex, but whenever she opens her mouth to talk it makes me soft.

I wish she knitted me a nice thinking hat.

>>16944775
>pedantic bullshit instead of addressing the comment
NTA but this is pathetic.

>>16939306
stupid bitch tried to set the precedent of erasing dead people's names from their own scientific work, apparently
i didn't really care about her one way or the other until she did that

>>16939306
I watched with the sound down and Kleenex.

>>16945086
Except if your downie ass actually watched the videos, you'd know she never did that.

Buy an ad stupid bitch

>>16945111
I like that Astro Angela visits here.

those teeth give me boner

>>16939306
typical midwit redditor who has a career as a low-level scientist that will probably get replaced by a.i. within 5 years

>>16939783
thats weird

i enjoy trucking youtuber woman

coincidence

>>16945353
>muh ai
kys baboon

>>16945107
that was the whole point of her fuckin two hour long feynman video

>>16945107
No it wasn't. Watch the video, then get back to me.

>>16945356
na she never disavowed him, only added nuance.

>>16945522
She actually spent a lot of the video listing his merits that contribute to his relevance. She never went full tw*tter on Feynman.

>>16939306
Do you think her mound is puffy?

>>16939403
You do know that she could simply not make videos about things she doesn't understand, right?

>>16945353
>midwit redditor
this perfectly encapsulates why I don't like her.

>>16945353
>>16945616
desu i prefer midwith redditors to you larping faggots at this point lol

>>16944932
she can suck while it's soft
its called cock nursing
and its really hot

>>16939306
foid nigger

>>16939306
too cute for /sci/
must be protected so she doesnt stop making science slop

>>16944775
I dont care anymore. I dont care about shit like that as its completely unimportant. Kill yourself.

>cute
Bitch be the middest of mids even with all the upped make.

>>16939371
Ayn rands writing is purile jewslop. Atlas shrugged is comically bad

>>16939306
>Seethes about JWST not being named after a scientist
James Webb contributed far more to the advancement of human spaceflight than any interchangeable scientist in recent memoryhas contributed to Astronomy. Scientific discoveries would likely be found by other scientists whereas there's an argument that if anyone else were NASA administrator the apollo programme may not have secured its funding.
This is just seethe from a low level scientist who has no career advancement ahead of them

She owes me sex.

>>16945525
dawg i don't care who she disavows, that would've been fine
like i said, she tried to set the precedent of REMOVING HIS NAME from his own work posthumously
no way in hell am i misremembering this

i don't give a shit about feynman personaly, and the video & "nuance-adding" was good

>>16939306
I liked her up until a recent video where she laughed about guys who are losers so now I unironically can't watch her videos.

She's generally right about other stuff though.

>>16942068
Bump

>>16946807
>>16945973
This makes to much sense

>>16946829
I'm not the first anon you posted

>>16939306
Huge bbc slut

>>16939306
Her take on AI is very shallow and full of lazy presumptions for someone who is supposedly a scientific method defender.

>>16944932
Don't be fooled by make up. She's an uggo, that's why she's an actual nerd.

>>16939306
She needs smug correction

>>16946856
proof?

>>16946851
Sorry Levi,
Nobody cares.

>>16939545
relative of Jacob?

>>16939306
She made a really good star trek video.

>>16943132
Chocolate Einstein is tolerable, although wrong.

>>16945600
Yes

>>16941682
>>16942515
What is the point?
That it takes a comical amount of resource investment that only a civilization of Gods could build, but is talked up by "futurists" like it's a practical goal?

i dont willingly watch videos with women in them unless its porn. does she do porn?

can anyone post a video of her where she actually does some physics instead of endless yapping?

I'm assuming people here don't like her because she's a left wing millennial woman

>>16942683
Dude, you aren't making a humanoid robot that can do your chores for less than the price of a car.

>>16939306
>6/10 on a good day
>lazy breadtuber cancer videos with fake stumbling
>subhuman simps will 1000x her fame and income nevertheless

I fucking hate modern Internet

>>16952587
A Dyson Swarm is just observing the endless expansion and growth of civilisation and pushing it to the point of “where does this eventually end? What’s the furthest point we can get to before we have nowhere else to go?” And that’s the Dyson Swarm. Where a civilisation has grown to such a scale it has devoured every single resource in its entire star system.

File: Rebecca Watson Somali Video Give All No Tax.webm (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB WEBM

>>16939306
Hotter/cuter version of Rebecca Watson

>>16939306
>Blackpill me on Angela Collier
She just wants her piece of the $$$ pie. I don't think her channel is compelling enough to have any staying power. We'll know it's dying when she starts getting tattooed and flashing her hairy beaver.

>>16939306
>goes on rant about thing
>instead of actually understanding a thing based on an unbiased position where nuance comes onto the table, veers off into pop-left-aligned political rambling and personal gripes

>>16956028
She may be the worst person in the Youtube "intellectual" space. Not just stupid, but an absolutely terrible person. Mean-spirited, petty, arrogant and self-centred.

It actually took quite a while after I came across her channel for me to realise she was the one from the 'Elevatorgate' flame war back in the day, but when I did it clicked immediately because that is exactly the kind of person she is; take a completely innocuous encounter and reframe it to make it look like she was victimized.

It is genuinely quite remarkable how she manages to have the wrong take on every single issue. Normally with left-wing commentators I have moments where I'm like: 'okay, I like them overall but I think they were wrong about this particular issue', or 'okay most of what this person says is way over the top but they're right about this issue'. Not her. She is the *worst*. She will even break from what other far leftists are saying just to find an even worse take.

She's like the Republican stereotype of an angry blue-haired leftist.

>>16939306
Knows her stuff, quite smart, but it is very clear that the main reason she got into astrophysics and went to all the trouble of getting a doctorate was so she could prove to everyone how smart she was and sneer at her intellectual inferiors. No love for the subject in its own right, it's all about ego. At least, that's the vibe I get from her channel. Most channels by scientists, it's like 'omg, look at this cool new discovery in my field', with her it's a mix of 'look at these stupid people getting it wrong', or 'let me show you how smart I am by explaining this astrophysics concept that inferior scientists are explaining wrong'. You know the type; maybe a milder version of Thunderfoot.

She's not stupid; I really liked her video on silicon-based life because she some hard science takes on the subject (although I'd still quibble with one or two points). But she feels like she'd be exhausting to be around irl.

>>16946856
shes a 6, not exactly ugly, but struggling to make my 6.5 incher hard for sure

>>16956202
4 at max. 6 is deluded.

>>16956028
I believe we should drop mf's like this into the center of Mogadishu and see how it pans out. Rocks will become rockets, heading straight for her uncovered (HARAM) head.

She's hot and cute

>>16956232
she isnt a 4 objectively, 99% of this board is attracted to her so the men on here that have advanced degrees are usually 2 inchers with dysgenic genetics except for IQ and get horny for any chick that has regular features

her knowledge of even basic subjects like QM is incredibly shallow for a physics phd, althoug i suspect this is a systematic issue for astrotards

>>16943938
I mean, the conclusion was more "the kinds of guys who idolise Feynman are weird and lame," so I'm sorry you're triggered about your crush or whatever.

>>16939306
From what I've seen, she knows a lot about physics and not much about anything else.

She did a video on the nobel prize for Insulin which was 90% good and then in the last 10% went on a hilariously stupid rant about how Big Pharma stole the patent for Insulin that Banting gave away for free and just charge money for doing nothing. This was AFTER she explained the Banting's original patent was for a method of extracting Insulin from dog pancreases and would be considered wildly unethical in today's world. Somehow those wires didn't connect in her head that modern insulin production is nothing like it was back then, or that corporations don't actually patent insulin itself, but production methods and medical formulations. She has lefty slop brain.

>>16956201
>so she could prove to everyone how smart she was and sneer at her intellectual inferiors
This is the correct reason to dislike her. She's haughty and mean spirited, and it comes across in her videos loud and clear no matter the topic.

>>16939323
>>16943172
AI produces negative results in whatever situation, industry, or arena you put it in. It's idiot boxes specifically for idiots.

>>16939306
I used to not like her, but then she trashed Feynman, which made feynfags seethe. Now I like her.

>>16957440
Bingo.

She's clearly been telling herself since undergrad that the reason no one likes her is because she's a woman in a man's field and all the fragile male egos can't handle how smart she is, when in fact the reason no one likes her is just that she's condescending and self-centered. Ironically she's just the female version of arrogant, socially awkward male scientist she spends so much time seething over.

>>16957576
And, she's wrong.

>>16957552
holy based

>>16956679
Bro you think you are a woman and you call me weird?

>>16943949
I didn't talk about anything. I don't care how correct she is about physics. Its easy to be correct about something you study your whole life. The real deal is when it comes to original thoughts which, in her case, is "cancel this dead guy he made me feel insecure". Absolutely retarded woman

File: Angela Collier - Sexual harassment and assault in Astronomy and Physics.webm (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB WEBM

To all the horny freaks in this thread, SHE DOESN'T WANT YOU!! And always remember, whether it's an elevator ( >>16956028 / >>16956201 ) or a classroom, talking to a woman about shared interests alone is sexual harassment!

She's gonna turn 44 and realize Mother Nature intended her to have babies and create a happy and stress free home.
By then, it'll be too late.

>>16958167
Yeah, that's another thing I've noticed about her: totally lacking in empathy. For people in general, but especially men.

>he knew it was inappropriate or he wouldn't have waited until we were alone
Or, he didn't want to make himself vulnerable in front of everyone, in case she shot him down. But she's never had to ask anyone else out before, so it doesn't occur to her that maybe he was just nervous; he *must* have been trying to get her alone to be nefarious.

Every time she describes an interaction she's had with another person, her understanding of the other person's motivations and inner thoughts seems to be her trying to find the most negative explanation possible rather than, like, just trying to put herself in their shoes. She isn't as bad as >>16956028 (who is clearly grifting as well as permanently butthurt) but she's definitely one of that set of Millennial women whose dominance of social media is the main reason dating - and frankly every other human interaction - is so toxic nowadays.

There are a lot of Millennial women whose standards for their own behavior are based on coastal, left-wing feminist values while their standards for other people's behavior towards them is based on conservative, red-state religious values. She can be as obnoxious and inconsiderate as she pleases because she's a strong, empowered woman and society has to deal with her as she is, but all the men around her had better treat her like she's a 19th century Southern debutante; do not even allude to sex in any context, only make advances in a formal, gentlemanly manner, and always be sure to step in should anyone else say something crass in her presence.

My guess is that she was raised in a red state then moved to a blue state for college, or maybe a blue area of a red state; I think a lot of this problem comes from women raised in conservative environments moving to liberal areas and adapting to the culture change by cherry picking the bits they like from each.

>>16957922
Reminder that if a white man made the same video and said "jew" a few more times you would actually watch it and then you would fellate him

>>16958276
Yes, this is correct.

>>16958258
I kind of like that women like her are selecting themselves out of the gene pool. Not every woman with a PhD is determined to make all human relationships as difficult as possible, and it's the easy-going ones who are breeding the next generation of academics. Nature is healing itself.

>>16939306
watched a couple videos and those were enough to notice:
> she's anti-AI meaning she CANT be that intelligent
> according to her everybody talking about corruption in academia is just a bitter loser grifter (Sabrina Hofsteder, Eric Weinstein etc)
so that makes it hard to take her takes seriously

>>16943177
yeah she clearly has the leftism brain worm despite being more intelligent than a regular brainwashee

>>16943177
yeah she clearly has the leftism brain worm despite being more intelligent than a regular brainwashee

>>16959074
What do you mean? All the people with genius-level IQ (145+) in my social circle despise AI. Me included.

>>16959090
Who's gonna tell him?

>>16939306
fact: she LOVES anal
she actually greatly prefers it
this is said in her videos

>>16959097
Tell me what, gayboy?

>>16957922
If she had any original thoughts, she'd not have a youtube channel to talk to normies, she'd be too busy churning out papers.

>>16959090
>calls himself a genius
>uses anecdotal evidence in argument

>>16958276
correct

>>16959333
THIS. It's the case with all YouTubers whether it's:
- movie reviewers (film school drop outs/unemployed in their field and refuse to take other jobs)
- lawyers (disbarred or inexperienced)
- science "communicators" (too lazy to finish a PhD/university drop outs thinking they're hot shit)
- history/engineering (Wikipedia readers, typically same as above)

>>16959259
Proof/Source? I wanna fap on out to the moment she actually says it!

>>16959090
Why? It's literally being used to make scientific advancements by being able to come up with new ideas/concepts for humans to then consider since it has a bigger pool of information/knowledge to draw upon than any one human ever had.

>>16957444
See, that's the type of dumb shit Angela will say, know it's popular enough among a hate mob that she won't lose subs over it

corr would shag angelas arse and tits

legally consensually ofcourse