You talked to a chatbot, didn't you?

>>16953367
Yeah, easier than reading textbooks.

>>16953534
>>16953367
The amount of AI psychosis schitzos showing up on /sci/ is in the last year is disturbing

>>16953542
It's only disturbing if you have a hard time making social predictions or you're emotionally involved with this board any deeper than skimming threads or the occasional shitpost.

Both would be clear signs of autism.

>>16953542
AI told me the current science, from which I extrapolated before unknown causation mechanisms, which I unrigorously tested.

No one peer reviewed my finds because I didn't reveal them to anyone.
Do you get it? I'm a world conqueror, my weapons are secret discoveries.

>>16953328
>exploit it to the max

How could you possibly hope to exploit your finding without revealing it to anyone?
Secrecy does not exist in the current computer era. Literally the only way to keep a secret in this world right now is to never write it down, never digitize it in any form, and make mention of it to any living being. It's not possible to exploit or utilize anything under these conditions.
Serious question, asking "for a friend"

>>16956804
I discovered formulas for many biological benefits (like IQ increase, dick growth, height enhancement) and wrote down only on paper, not on the internet, except when I asked chatGPT about the current science &c. I will exploit it by becoming a genius (and other things), thus becoming much better than others, and making money in other ways, without disclosing the formulas.

>>16957218
>by becoming a genius

>>16957233
Those who increase their IQ enough become geniuses.