Anonymous
06/05/26(Fri)04:06:45
No.
16994315
(�/�#�?JU pDichunkcience? �MyYrI�r3��e�NjI��
�� Showing all 10 replies.
>>
Anonymous
06/05/26(Fri)06:45:19
No.
16994343
>>16994315 Uninteresting results don't get published or even studied often.
>>
Anonymous
06/05/26(Fri)13:57:56
No.
16994527
>>16994315 >submit article with null result >faggot reviewer says its not notable enough and would hurt the prestige of the journal, rejects article
>>
Anonymous
06/05/26(Fri)14:02:33
No.
16994532
>>16994315 People thinking we're near max/reasonably good intelligence. We have the same problem today. Plus, human science is incredibly stupid, the graph tells a white lie like human science made a big leap. Humans are relatively low intelligence.
>>
Anonymous
06/05/26(Fri)14:26:27
No.
16994538
>>16994315 Publication bias / paper drawer effect.
>>
Anonymous
06/06/26(Sat)05:06:31
No.
16994922
>>16994315 I got rejected 3 times for submitting a paper where the results aren't groundbreaking I'm considering just lying about the results now cause fuck that shit
>>
Anonymous
06/06/26(Sat)11:28:52
No.
16995057
>>16994315 they died with covid
>>
Anonymous
06/09/26(Tue)20:27:30
No.
16997079
(�/�#�?�� �<45al, rerxvixra.��Nu�GĶ/�Kk���݁�Y�eA�S��L+�4�
>>
Anonymous
06/10/26(Wed)18:24:24
No.
16997659
(�/�#�?S� 8<4ostly�����٥�aR�=ޘ.3
>>
Anonymous
06/10/26(Wed)18:26:55
No.
16997662
(�/�#�?�� `<45arelghat?�d@W�_D�-�ȇ��v���>M���>3�?����Q
>>
Anonymous
06/10/26(Wed)18:38:10
No.
16997666
(�/�#�?J� @<76lilds�AZ��a
Reply to Thread #16994315
↑ ← Back 🔍