File: buffy.jpg (157.2 KB)

157.2 KB JPG

>remaster
yikes

File: WTF Jesus.jpg (194.3 KB)

194.3 KB JPG

>>1391224
Jesus fuck that's bad.

What's the best version of Buffy and Angel to get? I know there's the bluray/remasters, which are universally hated, there was a fan-made AI upscale, which looks weird to me, and there was a widescreen version released a while back with better picture quality, but people disliked it because you could see stuff like stuntmen and extras in the edges of the picture iirc

>>1391279
probably the dvdrip i can upload if needed

>>1391279
Just the DVD rips.

>>1391279
>What's the best version of Buffy and Angel to get?
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:88c349c4bdd3a17f2d23898bd13b8da3eac0a494&dn=Buffy The Vampire Slayer (1080p AI Upscale DVD x265 HEVC 10bit AC3 Vertag)

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:21ba4e90f7210e043ebb007d3152c255c813c0ff&dn=Angel+(1999)+(1080p+AI+Upscale+DVD+x265+HEVC+10bit+AC3+Vertag

>>1391279
>What's the best version of Buffy and Angel to get?
https://bitsearch.to/search?q=ai+upscale+vertag

>>1391224
thats a crime against humanity

>>1391279
>>1391224
Another thing you have to watch out for is that the audio on most BDs and some DVDs is slightly SPED UP. I shit you not. You can tell in some episodes like the one where they sing and Spike sounds like a eunuc...

>>1391360
>AI upscale
C'mon man. Stop doing people this way.

This isn't HD. But it's authentic. In a world full of slop peddlers that's the bare minimum. If you want it upscaled you can do your own upscaling, You'll probably want to source the original DVDs for that, not encodes like these. That's another discussion. Framerate should be 100% correct as well so the audio issues the other anon mentioned should be absent, NTSC source.

Buffy.The.Vampire.Slayer.S01-S07.NTSC.DVDRip.DD2.0.x264-MMI
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:161a09d199a05e1e1efebd0509dded74f485ecd2&dn=Buffy.The.Vampire.Slayer.S01-S07.NTSC.DVDRip.DD2.0.x264-MMI&xl=82937786483&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.demonii.com%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.stealth.si%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.ololosh.space%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fopen.free-tracker.ga%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fleet-tracker.moe%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexplodie.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Ftracker.moxing.party%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bittor.pw%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fshare.hkg-fansub.info%3A80%2Fannounce.php&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fretracker.spark-rostov.ru%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fhighteahop.top%3A6960%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Ffinbytes.org%3A80%2Fannounce.php&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fwepzone.net%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker2.dler.org%3A80%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.tiny-vps.com%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.qu.ax%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.filemail.com%3A6969%2Fannounce

where is the leaked pilot of the new relaunch?

>>1391279
>there was a widescreen version released a while back with better picture quality
Does anyone have this version? Don't particularly care about the stuff going on on the sides, and fuck any AI crap, it never makes things look good outside of the occasional still

>>1395761
I'll see what I can do. I'm working on a pack of Angel DVDRips then I'll try to see what I can do about non remastered widescreen WEB-DLs for preservation of the non-authentic releases.