Thread #97897465
File: BitchPlease.jpg (26.7 KB)
26.7 KB JPG
If nudity/sex/rape is forbidden in your games then so should aggravated assault and murder be as well.
>nooo you can't engage in the oldest profession of humanity
>but cutting a dude and spilling his guts on the floor, making him scream in agony for his mother as he bleeds out is fine and dandy
91 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
No.
And if anyone disagrees with that no then they aren't allowed to play at my table.
It's really that simple.
No retarded argument about how you should totally be able to gay erp in public will change my mind. In fact it will just make me judge you with contempt.
>>
>>
>>
>>97897465
I've never explicitly banned any theme or activity from my games, and never felt the need to, because I exclusively play with normal people from my irl friend group, not weird strangers off the internet who might be trying to masturbate under the table.
>>
>>97897465
>forbidden in your games
None of that stuff would be coming up in my games to begin with, here's why:
>nudity
Depending on how nude, it's less and less practical. My characters get to very indulgent levels of beef/cheese cake, but if a man rocks out with his cock out, he'd better believe it's going to get kicked, just as a woman with her nips exposed is definitely going to get them twisted at some point. Skin is nice, but a reasonable level of coverage is still necessary.
>sex
Going over the sexual acts of the party simply takes time away from the game. The forces that cause pregnancy requires full willingness between both parties, so accidents don't happen, regardless of how many sticky loads are pumped into her.
Plus, there are plenty of in-world religions encouraging multiple forms of casual consensual sex, so it's not like it's a universal taboo. It helps that STDs/STIs and such aren't a thing.
That aside, when I want to jerk off, I have plenty of sexual scenarios involving my characters I can think about outside the game; when I want to play a game, I play a damn game.
>rape
It is a thing that unfortunately happens in the world. Not as often as in ours, but it happens.
It is severely punished by numerous societies, and where the law doesn't know/can't catch perpetrators, there's always people who might make someone disappear over it.
This applies as much to male victims as it does to female victims, too. Given that the people of my worlds are largely altruistic, it stands to reason that consent is of huge importance.
But, once again, I play games when I want to play games, and jerk off when I want to jerk off; and I hate pretty much every form of non-consensual sexual scenario imaginable.
That aside, it'd be impractical for characters to do those things anyway; what are they going to do, rape the monsters? Violate a skeleton? And assaulting each other is out of the question, when you remember that they're heroes and are largely altruistic.
[ 1/2 ]
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 00.png (1.6 MB)
1.6 MB PNG
>>97897465
OK but consider: You have plenty of heroes that save the day by killing the villains, but how many heroes do you know that saved the day by fucking the villains, besides pic related?
>>
>>
[ Cont. from >>97898073 ]
>aggravated assault/murder
My games involve combat against monstrous, irredeemably evil, inhuman, incursive, and corruptive/destructive entities who are in closer semblance to a force of disaster than a living thing.
• Dark Lords
The Dark Lords are the closest thing to devils/demons in my game. They use their Evil Doctrine to raise their Nekropoli and enslave Undead, and the dead cities actively drain the Mana from the land, slowly turning it to ashen desert.
Left unchecked, entire ecosystems would die off.
• Monsters
They don't really cause ecological destruction, but they do harass and kill travelers, and can't be negotiated with, so they're a problem.
• Tyrants
Much like the Dark Lords, their power kills the land. However, it's a passive consequence instead of conscious effort, but it still turns the surroundings into volcanic badlands. Plus, they're very warlike, and want to conquer everything they see anyway, so they'd be trouble to keep around even without making everything lava.
• Xenith
A virus that emerged from cyberspace and seeks knowledge. Unfortunately, its means of attaining knowledge involves torturing and eventually roboticizing all living things it can.
How do you suppose regulations/laws against aggravated assault or murder apply to them? I'm genuinely curious.
[ 2/2 ]
>>
File: images (18).jpg (4.8 KB)
4.8 KB JPG
>OP equates sex work to rape to murder
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>97898396
>NTA, but you're either a retard, a troll, a christfag, a legbeard or a simp for a legbeard.
>>
>>97898359
Prostitutes exist in the black market economy, and are frequently subject to the risk of rape and/or murder.
If you would apologise to me we can continue.
One of my formative memories was living in a flat in Birmingham England, on the eleventh floor or so, and watching a one-legged prostitute (intravenous heroin addict, gangrene, amputee) being chased around the car-park by her machete-wielding pimp.
Her false leg was found in a bin, the rest of her never turned up.
>That didn't happen Chud
It did, and it happens twice a day every day.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>97898484
This is more of four dimensional proximity set theory type of thing.
Prostitution, theft, murder, rape, drug addiction; all these exist inside the set of underworld activities; they are found in the same environments and exist in the same ecosystems and environments.
Where one goes, the others are never far away, like the shovel and the freshly dug grave.
You are being very silly.
>>
>>
>>97898529
>Can't tell the difference between sex work and prostitution
>Thinks prostitution is related to rape and murder
Don't you have some death metal to blair in your bedroom loud enough that you hope your mommy will hear it? You've got that incel energy, my man. You're well on your way to becoming a wizard.
>>
>>
>>97897465
Murder and violence can be used to generally advance group-wide goals, and the adversarial nature of them means that the details of precisely what happens during such an encounter is relevant to play.
Nudity/sex/rape generally does not advance group-wide goals, the former two's generally non-adversarial nature means the details are largely irrelevant to the continuity of the participating PC. The final is not only a moral violation, but a practicality violation as well; rape accomplishes little in the time-frame of most campaigns that general torture wouldn't. Further, due to the practicality violation, such an act pegs your PC group as outright evil rather than desperate or overzealous, which is generally a bad thing.
>>
>>
>>
We simulate the need for your character to sleep, we should also simulate the need to go the the bathroom too.
Different races have different languages, why doesn't the human language change over miles, being unintelligible from one side of a kingdom to the other.
Full plate came into common use after guns, why aren't there guns?
>>
File: Archer.jpg (212.9 KB)
212.9 KB JPG
>>97898625
>we should also simulate the need to go the the bathroom too.
>>
>>
>>
>>97898073
>>97898321
You wasted your time.
How does it feel?
>>
>>
>>97898693
I read that and at least it's informative, if autistic (not in insult sense). I prefer honest, genuine autism over noncommital shitposting designed to throttle any discussion and lower the quality of this shithole board even further.
>>
>>97897465
Rape and sexual assault are both vastly more common than aggravated assault and murder, so the former is much more likely to make someone uncomfortable at the table. What is and what is not allowed at the table is not based on arbitrary categories, but if it will or won't make the experience unpleasant for someone. If you can't understand that then you have brain problems.
In addition, while you can justify violence, there is never any moral reason to rape.
>>
>>
File: holy angel painting.jpg (398 KB)
398 KB JPG
>>97897465
Finally, a /tg/ user with common sense. In My games I simply don't allow evil characters. Rape and wanton violence are for the villains only.
>>97898321
This sounds fun Anon
>>
>>97898829
>historically there were times when it could be a life-saving measure, thus morally justifiable.
I genuinely can't think of a single instance, either current or historical, in which raping someone is the better option. Maybe in an absurd hypothetical, like
>Oh no, aliens are invading and if you don't have non-consensual sex they'll kill everyone!!!
But never in anything remotely close to realistic.
>>
>>97898866
Robespierre's Reign of Terror - as a general rule pregnant noblewomen were spared, so knocking one up, even against her will, would be a life-saving measure.
On more general terms - in the face of secular justice pregnant women were often exempt from death sentence, even for crimes that would otherwise guarantee capital punishment (piracy, treason).
>>
>>
>>
File: 1763286160028.jpg (78.1 KB)
78.1 KB JPG
>>97898262
>>
>>97898866
In current context, with definition of rape getting generalized to include non-penetrative acts (that would historically only classify as harrasment) administering CPR could be both life-saving and classify as rape. Broadly speaking "invasive" medical procedures performed on patient that's unconscious or otherwise unable to consent.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: when-you-try-to-talk-to-a-villager-with-a-net-equipped-v0-1jlclJi6XSqgFf43LtY2LPZEz4SozXDPbT9l9OZlHyo.jpg (14.8 KB)
14.8 KB JPG
Wow I can't believe CoD doesn't have whores. Everyone knows you can't have violence without whores.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: file.png (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB PNG
>>97899668
no, the trpg Toon from the 80s
do i know why this one term became commonplace when Toon itself isn't very well known? no
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>97900662
Depends on how you treat them. Humans deserve dignity as a basic right, even if the individual does not. This is a principle. I know lynching, mutilating, and torturing pedos sounds fun, but people who committed lesser crimes or innocents could suffer that treatment as well. Imagine getting your balls chopped for a jpeg, or being labled a pedo because the woman was petite, or because he said she said. Eitherway, most prison rape isn't as ethically sourced as you imagine.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>97897465
It’s typical of the US: they have an extremely violent culture mixed with puritanism. They seem incapable of viewing any form of sexuality in a positive or normalised light; anything to do with sex is a fetish (apart from rape). What’s more, they tend to see everything in black and white… The sad thing is that they’ve exported all that crap all over the world.
>>
>>
>>
>>97900662
There are two types:
Preferential (approx. 50–60% of offenders): These individuals have a persistent, primary sexual interest in children. This group is most closely linked to the "neurodevelopmental" theory, showing higher rates of minor neurological signs (like non-right-handedness or lower IQ).
Individuals who have a pedophilic orientation but never offend (sometimes called "non-offending pedophiles") often show higher activity in the prefrontal cortex (the neocortex) and better executive function than those who do offend.
This suggests that the "neocortex" acts as a brake; when it is impaired by brain injury, cognitive deficits, or substance abuse, the ability to inhibit those "miswired" urges drops significantly.
Situational (approx. 40–50% of offenders): These individuals typically have an orientation toward adults but offend due to external factors like high stress, intoxication, or "regressing" because they feel inadequate in adult relationships.
Clinical estimates suggest that between 0.5% and 1% of the male population meets the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia.
In some anonymous surveys, up to 3% to 5% of men report some level of sexual interest in minors, though the vast majority of these individuals never act on those feelings.
>>
A significant portion of people have Ephebophilia and to lesser extend Hebephilia. These are not classified as sexual disorders because they are part of the normal range of sexuality.
Outside of the scientific world, the word "pedophile" has undergone "concept creep," where a specific clinical term has expanded to cover any sexual behavior involving a minor. Most legal jurisdictions don't care about the Greek roots of the words. They categorize crimes based on the "Age of Consent." This is because, legally and socially, the focus is on the vulnerability of the minor and the breach of law, rather than the biological orientation of the adult. In research papers or at psychiatric conferences, you will never hear a 17-year-old’s attraction called pedophilia.
>>
>>