Shill.
I can’t wait for the inevitable “aren’t you so excited about such and such leaks?!” just to shit up yet another thread and drive “engagement”.
Do better goodsmile co.

Thinking about the 3in1 Creator Dragon if it was teal or light bley with reddish orange wings... mmm
I'd even take magenta or dark purple with light aqua wings. Now that's a fucking palette. None of that green/red shit.
I just want a source of creature parts in interesting colors.

File: ea1f5acd-4b90-41e1-9efe-8a4290cce3bd(1).jpg (507 KB)

507 KB JPG

>>11759204
>Do better goodsmile
Not until you buy our brick-shit.

File: 2646CF3C-F86D-44D6-8509-655166502ADC.jpg (300 KB)

300 KB JPG

>>11759211

IT'S UP
>IT'S UP
IT'S UP
>IT'S UP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXHp_QXmWbc

>>11759216
Which one of these two homos is you?

>>11759200

Reminder that Lego is asking for (You) to tell how they have fucked up:

https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=FTUGHa1slUGUhupl30Vvqs2Wvh-cVf9As0yG8OZoWRJUREY2SjRBODkyR1pTUjJOUUg1R1g2SDdGWS4u

>>11759256
>The LEGO Group has accused competing brick-building toy manufacturers of orchestrating a coordinated campaign to undermine its reputation, according to a statement released Friday by the company’s legal team.

>In the announcement, LEGO said it has gathered what it describes as “substantial evidence” indicating that rival companies in the construction toy sector have worked together to spread negative claims about LEGO’s pricing and product quality. The alleged campaign reportedly took place across social media platforms, online forums, and e-commerce marketplaces.

>The company claims that these efforts were designed to portray LEGO products as overpriced and inconsistent in quality—assertions LEGO strongly denies.

>“These claims are not only inaccurate, but appear to be part of a deliberate and organized attempt to mislead consumers,” the company said in its statement. “Our products are subject to strict quality control standards, and we stand firmly behind their safety, durability, and value.”

>While LEGO did not publicly name the companies involved, it characterized them as “competitors within the global brick-building toy industry,” some of which have gained traction in recent years by offering lower-cost alternatives to LEGO sets.

>Industry analysts say the construction toy market has become increasingly competitive, with emerging brands challenging LEGO’s long-standing dominance. However, experts note that direct allegations of coordinated disinformation campaigns between competitors are rare and could signal a significant escalation in industry tensions.

>LEGO’s legal team stated that it is actively investigating the matter and considering potential legal action against those responsible. The company also indicated it may pursue claims related to unfair competition and reputational harm.

>>11758805
>Personally I feel like my issue with modern lore centric themes (Ninjago, Chima, Nexo Knights, Hidden Side, Monkey Kid, Dreamzzz) is that it feels hard to work these kind of sets into scenarios outside of the initial scene depicted in the sets.

I have this same problem with EVERY new set. I look at the new Town leaks in >>11758726 and they use so many specialized pieces that I struggle to figure what can be made out of them except the exact model they made. The spirit of simply messing around and doing whatever you want that's so crucial to Lego suffers from how superficially nice-looking and polished the kits have become.

>>11758498
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there a rumor about two 18+ sets ("Tahu helmet" and "Bionicle logo") coming out in 2026/2027?

File: 1776008477872125.png (798.2 KB)

798.2 KB PNG

>>11759258
This is fake, there's no article that says this. I know, because I looked.

>>11759262
Cope.

File: Mercs.png (2.8 MB)

2.8 MB PNG

>man with figbarf: i am growing stronger
Two groups of fantasy mercenaries: the terrific trio known as the Helpful Hoods and the dastardly duo who call themselves Moonlighters (and their employer, Max Grotto)

>>11759264
It doesn't exist. The cope is from you.

>>11759262
By now it would have been covered by newssites like brickset or stonewars. The reddit spacing implies it's a copypasta made with ai to troll /lg/.

>>11759270
Post MOCs retard.

>>11759267
>>11759272
Seeth

>>11759270
>>11759271
More Sonic sets, please

File: Excerpt.png (131.6 KB)

131.6 KB PNG

Thoughts on the Jangifesto?

>>11759270

At least that boat and chopper JP set looks like it'd be fun to play with if you replace the skin-colored minifigs with proper yellow smileyfaces.

File: 1280x1382.jpg (107.9 KB)

107.9 KB JPG

yay finally technic releasing interesting set

>>11759265
neat figs

File: FBMP SCORE.jpg (2.4 MB)

2.4 MB JPG

Finally got a lucky score on marketplace. The ad read "purging teenager room." Can't decide whether to build it or flip it. What are other anon's marketplace finds?

>>11759272
>The reddit spacing implies it's a copypasta made with ai to troll /lg/.

Perhaps, but there are news sites that do spacing like that.

>>11759305
At this point I wouldn’t be surprised if it was all one guy.

>>11759280
I've been saying forever that for their 20 years they'll re-remake the 2012 deatiny's bounty and it will be absolutely massive and use all sorts of new tech we seen with the temple bounty and whatever else comes after it in the next 5 years

File: 51680BXBZ5L._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg (94.2 KB)

94.2 KB JPG

Exo Force General Exo Force Board

File: RCO001_1747792336.jpg (3.7 MB)

3.7 MB JPG

>>11759278
Agreed. Honestly TLG is just leaving money on the table by not doing sets based of the fairly recent Sonic x DC crossover. Just alter the prints on existing character head molds and make some minor tweeks to other prints. The fans will eat it up.

File: 563499123-orig.jpg (379.2 KB)

379.2 KB JPG

>>11759200
Why doesn't Lego re-release old sets?
I'm not talking about "nostalgic homages" with 5 times the piece count and 10 times the price. I'm talking about literally just making the same thing they already made and letting people buy more of it. There's a shitload of old sets I'd buy if I didn't have to pay the "rare collectible" tax on them.

>>11759386
I just want simple sets that look like toy building block sets. (The brickbuilt stuff has been pretty good for this actually.) And not AFOL black box shit. I really want no stupid mario and animal crossing rounded square sets but it seems likely unfortunately since they were made for mario. I'd take that over afol black boxes though

Also fuck you frog

>>11759378
>Why doesn't Lego re-release old sets?
Because they personally don't like you anon.

File: comfy2.jpg (684.4 KB)

684.4 KB JPG

>>11759279
2011 Sep 22, Bloody Thursday, Highway 237 incident .

>>11759279
2010 June : abortive attempt at being a Reviewbrah

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHlcAKALGgM

>>11759378
Betting they'd rack up the prices no matter what, didn't they basically do that with that woodsman tree?

>>11759425
They say time’s a healer…

>>11759378
No one tells you this, but Lego bricks are all interchangeable and mass produced and you can simply build any old set you want

File: Fated_Forest.jpg (190.1 KB)

190.1 KB JPG

>>11759444
... but not for ever soul.

File: 313202634936.png (113.3 KB)

113.3 KB PNG

To the anon from the last thread, yeah I would prefer a monthly Lego comic over having to watch cartoons.

>>11759373
Thank for reminding me I'm missing issue #4.

>>11759386
I warned up to Lego Mario sets, mostly just the brick built figures. The actual sets are usually pretty awful and expensive. And I do not believe the smart brick Mario was a good idea and it looks like customers didn't like it either.

>>11759301
>Free Lego
You build it.

What are your guys thoughts on the animal crossing sets?

>>11759287
>it's just a truck
Can they at least bring back Technic Competition? or their weird scifi cars for Drome Racers?
Technic figures? Anything aside from licensed vehicles?

>>11759474
I hate the fact that the theme will be discontinued before they make a chrissy minifig

>>11759499
I hate that the theme will be discontinued before making even a single good villager :,^(

File: 98283.png (48.1 KB)

48.1 KB PNG

>>11759386
>Expectations for 2027 Mario sets?
masonry brick but 2x2. maybe the pattern on opposite sides, maybe all 4 sides (?) 2x2 brick with "?" sticker on the side (maybe printed lol)

if the One Piece Lego guy is "designing" the sets, I expect Mario-wearing-hat in $90 minimum set lol. honestly my expectations are right around where Animal Crossing is. on the very edge of seeming FANTASTIC but only if they had another minifig in every set. so I might get 1 just to have it, but each set will seem like it's too much $$ for what you get (if only they had one more minifig! argh!) so let's see if I can grab it on clearance next year (even though I would kinda have wanted it now)

File: ankha-animal-crossing.gif (214.3 KB)

214.3 KB GIF

>>11759474
ONE

MORE

MINIFIG

in each set, the theme would have been perfect.

depending on which characters were the 1-more, I might have gotten them all, instead of 1 set each wave, and a few stragglers on clearance (I did wind up with several of them)

none of my neighbors from my game got minifigs, so that sucks. but there are 500 characters so that's bad odds any way you look at it. even if you lump ANY of my 10 neighbors, that's only 2% chance. out of 100%

did anybody tell Lego about the meme character? it's like free money they just leave on the table. it blows my mind how corporate people shy away from muh-controversy instead of leaning into it. Ankha is a chapter in the game. Lego could make a simple set without any reference at all to why she is popular. free money as people giggle and buy the set

File: ROCKY MOC.jpg (1.2 MB)

1.2 MB JPG

Here's the Rocky moc alt built from 31162 so you don't have to buy the instructions

>>11759512
>Ankha is a chapter in the game.
Ankha is a *character in the game
(dang spell check, but also me for not double checking, I guess)

also I hope Lego is just doing a pause on the sets, pending Smart Brick success or flop, because there would be opportunities to do game synthesized sounds in AC sets that would match a whole/ lot better than the Star Wars did, or they could just forget-it and release more regular AC sets.

File: ROCKY MOC 2.jpg (59.9 KB)

59.9 KB JPG

>>11759516
He did, however, make a more accurate version out of 76217, free instructions. The retired set is at least double the price though

>>11759515
yeah that was a cheeky poke at the lame One Piece thing, where they carefully designed the inclusion of the main character into only the most expensive sets

A - cheap set: Luffy, not wearing hat
B - kinda-expensive set: Luffy with stretch arms, but wearing the hat
C - Expensive set: normal torso Luffy, wearing the hat
A+B=C

the main character is locked into high price. the joke was that somehow, they would do that with freaking Mario, too, if they could

wait the scatfag at lego is real? wtf

>>11759378
>Why doesn't Lego re-release old sets?
They have done this to several sets. Redbeard Runner for example had original 1996 release (set 6289) and then in 2001 they re-released it as 6290.

https://brickset.com/sets/tag-Rereleased-Sets

>>11759512
Given the villagers are the very soul of the animal crossing series, it’s a bit baffling they didn’t lean heavily into the villager minifigs. We have 15 sets and only as many unique villagers. It really does boggle the mind. What are the odds any individual person would be excited by even one of these? We really needed like 30-50 villagers in total.
As it stands, you can’t really make a unique town. I don’t even know if there’s a representative of each personality type — is there?

>>11759474
>What are your guys thoughts on the animal crossing sets?
Why are you posting in an international building hobby desperately looking for friends?

>>11759604
>we are so lost that only IP themes are theorized at this point

File: DSC_0219.jpg (768.6 KB)

768.6 KB JPG

>>11759312
Man this takes me back.
Had plenty of the smaller mechs and the white stealth hunter, but they're all lost to time except for pic-related. Someday I'll buy a brand new sealed stealth hunter again..

File: lan.png (3.5 MB)

3.5 MB PNG

>>11759200
ATTN: LAN EMPLOYEES

as you may have heard bricksie has turned

release your videos condemning and belittling him, you may delay your other review videos by one (1) business day in exchange

File: 6062-1.jpg (111.1 KB)

111.1 KB JPG

>>11759463
>ever
every

>>11759641
Kek. I knew what you were going for.
>how cold have we all become?

>>11759604
I wonder how one can possibly be into all these shows and games simultaneously. Is this a consoomer thing?

>>11759665
He gets paid to do it.

>>11759665
thats not many things to be into, but who ever said anyone was into them all simultaneously? lego is trying to get a whole lot of different fans in at the same time

>>11759668
ban evading again carcrash?

File: ufo gulliver.jpg (16.8 KB)

16.8 KB JPG

>>11759474
They're good if you like New Horizons. I'm curious what the summer one will be, did they say that's the final in the line? Anyway I feel like its a missed opportunity to ignore all of the other games, there could be some cute sets.

File: 6644-1.jpg (121.9 KB)

121.9 KB JPG

>>11759644
He had places to go, he had people to meet.

File: ani027.png (144.7 KB)

144.7 KB PNG

>>11759673
as far as I know there have been no "leaks" about the implied one summer set, except that there would be one. I don't even know if they were talking about the Tom Nook polybag that has been spotted in Target stores already (with the balloon present)

I kinda remember hearing that AC was on pause due to Lego being overwhelmed with stuff to make, and it was not like... "done" and they would pick back up next year

maybe a good break so they can get some new molds for different animals. maybe a non-unicorn horse would be easy, but also maybe birds, hippos, sheep, octopus legs, or any of the others

>>11759474
Someone in the boardroom or decision making team is a clown for not having a cmf line ready to go with it like the amibo cards for the game, or any of the villagers people bully and abuse eachother in honour of, or beg to get from them on their island
Animal crossing should have been a money printer but seems horribly mishandled

>>11759669
What’re you talking about now?
>carcrash
Like the one on highway 237?

File: 84358pb02.jpg (70 KB)

70 KB JPG

Never looked into the disney shit before, came out while I was out of the hobby, and was looking through the minifigs made for a set based on that shitty live action Little Mernaid film and found this rather odd design. The minifigure uses a non printed head with a hair piece that depicts the entire face itself. What would be the benefit of this over the standard method of hair pieces having a window for the actual face print underneath?

>>11759378
This one set would be almost entirely "new" parts now because they don't have half the molds anymore, need to do the prints again, and don't produce light grey, dark grey and brown anymore (easy change, to be fair). With their part box system for themes, this would be the most retardedly wasteful product line you could come up with. And it would still be expensive as fuck.
>>11759474
Cute as a novelty but I'm not spending what they're asking. Stores around here never put anything on sale so I'm never getting anything.

File: file.png (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB PNG

>>11759512
Depends on if they can print her face to the head. These heads are intended for a certain select of villagers, while also limiting some of their designs. Most of the animal heads have dual molding in certain areas. Some of which are made for certain characters like Lily, Fauna, and Audie. Julian is the only horse villager that's a unicorn, so I don't think they'll do any based off of that head. He's also triple molded for the white and two shades of blue. With the dual molds, Lego will print over or dual mold the same color plastic for other characters.
Thinking of the limitations, I don't expect Ankha to have a unique dual molded head and she would just use the already existing cat head in dark blue. So it would probably make her short bob cut a bit longer now having to reach the bottom of her head. Looking at Sasha, her face print seems to go pretty low to the bottom of her head, so maybe enough for the yellow fur to reach and show off the bob cut at least in the front. The yellow stripes would only be on the back of her head not reaching the sides, because Lego hates side printing. The only 3D part of her is the cobra, which would probably just be printed on. Her tail, like Rosie they only did it in sky blue, so hers would just be yellow. Lastly dual molded arms, and just yellow legs. So with limitations, it's possible.

File: 169993999938_1200-2818793807.jpg (477 KB)

477 KB JPG

Remakes of old sets are a mixed bag, the Galaxy Explorer is one of the best sets since 2010 but then you see how ridiculously compromised Majisto's Workshop that it's just sad to look at. As a castlefag I would have been more then happy to buy the Forestmen Hideout remake but couldn't since I don't buy new Lego and won't pay aftermarket prices, meanwhile they let me buy this dogshit with no issue, thanks Lego.

File: wiz darktable.png (2.1 MB)

2.1 MB PNG

>>11759782
A dress wearing wizard is no match for my GITD

File: Ankha_NH.png (763.2 KB)

763.2 KB PNG

>>11759774
game-Ankha seems totally do-able, even with a custom unique cobra piece to plug into the hat-hole on the existing cat head. people would be encouraged to buy the set just to get that cool cobra ornament piece

File: blt4b2691e217fb0bc0-43015_Prod.png (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB PNG

Which $80 Futbowl Golem are y'all getting?

File: 75639_Prod_en-gb.png (617.1 KB)

617.1 KB PNG

I got my first lego One Piece set, the Going Merry, and the four wanted posters it came with are Luffy, Alvida, and Arlong x2? Are any of them rare?

>>11759812
The posters all had equal rarity so none of them in particular are particularly collectable. That said it's really fucking shitty that they would allow repeats in the same set.

File: action shot.png (987.7 KB)

987.7 KB PNG

>>11759804
none, only because I'm not into Futball
but I like these little art-action scenes. I hope Lego does other sports. for sure they could do Basketball (Lego already did!) but they can probably do Baseball, Tennis, Golf, Football, um... Hockey... I feel like I'm forgetting one, lol there's gotta be lots of sports that could get popular players in neat little art scenes.

it's a win-win. get the exact minifig of your favorite player, and Lego gets to sell it with a bunch of pieces to jack-up the price.

>>11759804
>Wasting money on Fifa shit no one will buy
>Wasting money on Chinese shit no bug man will buy
>Wasting money on developing the smart brick
>Not producing a new castle line despite it having the largest demand of any original lego product
What the fuck is Lego thinking?

>>11759836
On the contrary I'm looking forward to the 711032 Rapist Ronaldo MOC

>>11759287
This is the least shitty thing in the whole lineup so far, I still want the leaker gone and the spammer too but hey, pneumatic stuff aint dead, they should do much more vs these licensed carslops but still
>>11759309
>>11759305
Froggy has been shown to be mentally insane before, so no surprise for me he generates ai shart walls of gibberish just to ruin quality here further and remove real posters and post more shitty shillshit to try and boost his paycheck, so tiresome

>>11759893
Trying to deny there is a spammer at the point is pretty sus behavior. We all saw what happened last time he crashed out and blew up the thread with ebony and ivory.

File: alt-6077-1-1788660196.jpg (509.4 KB)

509.4 KB JPG

For me it's the forrestmen.

>>11759897
You do this thing where you jump back and forth between a semi-defensible claim (“a spammer exists”) to outlandish conspiracy (“the spammer exists and is paid by Lego to ruin and thin out the very thread he’s supposed to be marketing in, and he’s doing so by way of AI copypastas that portray Lego as entitled, vainglorious, and litigious” — how would any of that make any sense?).
Even if I grant the spammer exists and is one man, none of the other dozen insane claims you tack on follow, and not one of them is self-evident.

>>11759893
>>11759906
>thinking everybody is the same guy
lol froggy projecting much?

>>11759908
The irony, my god. You quite literally think everyone who pushes back on you is a single paid French shill you schizo retard

>>11759906
You know not everyone is this “schizo” you’re referring to? Which is why I get the feeling you’re the one shitting up both sides of the bed.
Post some legos. You won’t.

>>11759919
I'm the schizo he is referring to please stop bullying him

>>11759395
I meant the weird plates

File: ad-1987_63.jpg (230.3 KB)

230.3 KB JPG

https://youtu.be/d2qCfN10BHg?si=O2Kdtm0NvVSKFONs
Was watching this video snd it touched upon a point I never considered with how old sets were designed. Because the system was so much smaller this allowed larger sets to often contain a vast majority of elements used in smaller sets giving the builder not justone big playset, but multiple smaller playsets if desired.

File: 1691725839433499.jpg (61.9 KB)

61.9 KB JPG

>>11759919
>Post some legos. You won’t.
Neither will you it seems

>>11759474
I feel like it's really guilty of using very small parts to make the price/part count higher when everything is too small. I dont like the plates they use. But other than that its alright except for the weird as fuck villager and NPC choice. No Bob? No actual new villager from the game it's from? Alrighty then

File: digusted sigh.jpg (66.8 KB)

66.8 KB JPG

>>11759804
None. I'd rather burn my money than spend one dollar on Canadian Football slop.

File: 20260401_135116.jpg (1.7 MB)

1.7 MB JPG

Would if be weird if I had equal amounts of Spyrius droids and astronauts? Or should droids always be in the minority? Ignore the fact they are rabbits I just had a moment on bricklink...

>>11759919
>not everyone is this “schizo”
>which is how I know [schizo theory]
????

>>11759968
You should read and watch Satantango

File: 000smallspacertruckhundred.png (417.1 KB)

417.1 KB PNG

look at my flat ugly spaceshit boy

>>11759936
No idea, but you could headcanon it as a later point in time where they've automated more, for example.

>>11759978
Can minifigures even sit in that? I don't think they'd have any space for the arms.

>>11759279
>2013-2017: Success
what about 2018-2026?

>>11759280
Ninjago Legacy isn't evergreen, it's for anniversaries. Why would it have new sets in 2027?

>>11759978
Can you show the interior?

File: rn-image_picker_lib_temp_076867e.png (885 KB)

885 KB PNG

>>11759698
The tom nook polybag was leaked awhile ago, I didn't realise it was out though.
I do hope that there's more sets coming though, it'll be a shame if they killed the line off without telling anyone.

>"Oh wow that Mosasaurus sure is lazy. Just a huge solid piece. Must have done it to cut down on costs..."
>Set retails for $100
What the actual fuck are they thinking?

>>11760023
a switch to the superior funwhole brick

>>11760024
didn't last legacy wave for 10th anni have sets that came out the following year?

>>11760031
Did you miss the brachiosaurus set? That thing was like 85 dollars for the worst tree you have ever seen, a truck, and one ugly dinosaur. Dino tax is absolutely insane. I imagine it's also the idea of hyperspecialized moulds being sooo expensive, pleaaaase we need out profit margins

>>11760031
>What the actual fuck are they thinking?
"Those gullible fucks would even buy it at 200..."

>>11759386
Donkey Kong big fig

>>11759782
>As a castlefag I would have been more then happy to buy the Forestmen Hideout remake but couldn't since I don't buy new Lego and won't pay aftermarket prices
You should be able to still find that for a reasonable price and you definitely should get it because it's one of my favorite sets of any modern castle stuff. It's a shame that we don't get small castle sets like that anymore and they are all locked behind GWPs.

>>11760077
>>11760077
Wasn’t the forestmen hideout a gwp?

>>11760096
Nta but you can still get them on Amazon, eBay, Bricklink. Most GWP seem to go for $30-$40. I think even your final receipt from Lego.com will show that the GWP had an actual cash price and then it says $0.00 next to the price

File: 000smallspacertruckhundred_2.png (468.4 KB)

468.4 KB PNG

>>11760020
Yup, those seats are on jumper tiles, so they have just enough room to have two minifigs sit side by side
>>11760026
I hope this is a good enough angle, it doesnt really show off the bunk beads or bathroom that well

File: lego listens.jpg (79.7 KB)

79.7 KB JPG

We fucking won!

>>11759474
Kino. We just Ankha and Raymond minifgs in the final set.

>>11759820
Guess you just have to buy another Going Merry set :)

>>11760164
What the fuck is even the appeal of lego one piece? Feels like yet another bullshit excuse to not get a Lego Pirates theme

File: Reality.png (383.5 KB)

383.5 KB PNG

HALFWAY THROUGH APRIL AND STILL NO LEAKS OF BOUNTY HUNTER PURSUIT 2.0
AAAAAAAAAAAAIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>11760156
>we won!
>lego is finally listening!
Sorry, but we are never getting out of IP hell, and unless you classic castle or pirates or whatever else fans come out in huge numbers as a consumer segment, you’re going to be stuck in 18+ nostalgia throwback jail subsisting on a single fuckhueg set a year.

File: cas588.jpg (56 KB)

56 KB JPG

>>11760156
I'm not going to watch the video, nice ad tho
good click-bait vague-ness and the request for action is chef's kiss "...you NEED to say..."

I don't know if this means Lego is going to do less Castle sets or no more Expensive sets, but click and find out!

Lego only "listens" to the dollars. if nobody bought the $500 Castle, Lego assumes we don't want Castle. Lego has to see -ALL $X00 sets- decline in sales, to "listen" that customers no longer want $X00 sets, and THAT ain't happening

>fake site down to make it even worse to post on and to discuss shit on
they really want the only people left on this entire shithole to be shills huh

>>11760228
I don't mind being price locked out of sets but it sucks being price locked out of entire themes and licenses I would otherwise be interested in.

>>11759312
i remember buying the sentai fortress, got 2 of them at wal mart maybe around 2007 or 2008, can't remember what year but they were like $25 each. I had almost all the sets except the big green wheels one and the other building at the top. the yellow robot was my favorite.

the second wave of exo force sucked though the jungle one.

File: Spock Wisdom.jpg (43.3 KB)

43.3 KB JPG

>>11760245
>it sucks being price locked out of entire themes and licenses I would otherwise be interested in.
-Zelda
-Star Trek
both things I am heavily excited to see in Lego
neither one affordable to me
sorry even the bump-down on the Zelda to what, $130? is too much.
can I get a $20 set please? dang it.

>>11759345
The problem with exoforce is it lacked interesting villains.

>>11760250

$130 for some plastic blocks is ludicrous though.

>>11760268
>$130 for plastic blocks is ludicrous
How? What if you get $130 worth of plastic blocks?

>>11760267
The problem with exo force was the butt fucking fugly mechs and cringe westoid-totally-spies-anime aesthetic

>>11760269
The zelda set is about 1.1 Kg.
1.1 kg of plastic costs $1.10 dollars.
The raw materials for that lego set could be purchased 118 times for the price you are paying for it.

File: WDYTWA.jpg (66.6 KB)

66.6 KB JPG

>>11760268
>$130 for some plastic blocks is ludicrous though

>>11760268
>$130 for some plastic blocks is ludicrous though.
exactly. that's why I did not get the Enterprise-D, either.

it sounds silly to say out loud, but it makes me want to cry. I like Star Trek so much! I like Lego, too! but...

it's like when you see somebody in a Lamborghini or a yacht, a private jet. other people own their own islands! those things are not for me. and now, neither is Star Trek Lego, apparently

>>11760286
I’m not going to get into the myriad ways this claim is pants-on-head-retarded. But you realize this necessarily generalizes to any and all Lego products, right? If $130 set isn’t worthwhile because you can buy a kilo of unprocessed plastic for $1, it follows that a $10 set isn’t worthwhile for the exact same reason.

>>11760267
Incorrect, MEKA-1 is sick as hell.

>>11760270
Incorrect and homosexual, most likely a Gaydam fan.

>>11760209
Don't worry, mousecuck, more mouseslop is churning its way through the intestinal pipeline as fast as they can get it to your trough. Keep your eye on that sphincter!

File: 130663_P1014394.jpg (369.1 KB)

369.1 KB JPG

does anybody have a scan code list for the new series 29 CMF? when I try to internet search it's all "do the App!" "the App is updated!!" and I'm like, sure, let me give permission to a random App use of my phone camera. sounds alright.

and none of that gets me the list of CODES. argh am I the only guy on the planet that doesn't trust the Apps? I can use my own camera and look at a number just fine

File: bricks and minifigs.png (872.8 KB)

872.8 KB PNG

Threepio Thief got the original vid pulled? kek

>>11760232
carcrash my man, you need to calm down

File: Legit Scummy Thief.png (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB PNG

>>11760300
what a crazy situation.
that guy 100% tried to rob that C-3PO.

but... who drops off a loose bin of parts and walks away? what extreme TRUST that is. that seller kid should have sat down there and watched business-guy-thief look through the figures.

you basically dangled a steak in front of a starving dog and looked away. of course that dog is going to eat the steak! muh-temptation-wuz-too-great. yeah that guy is scum, but it was also cruel to test him in such a devastating way (still, to be clear, more blame on the real criminal there)

I hope that guy felt so much shame he became a better person. that's just me being optimistic

>>11760292
The point is that the raw materials alone still only cost the company 0.8% of the price they are asking. Yes obviously there's mold injection, leasing, maintenance, transportation, licensing, and the myriad of other production costs inbetween but if the raw material alone is that fucking cheap it makes you wonder just how much the other processes actually cost lego. That $130 set could probably be sold for $70 and still net Lego a profit.

>>11760307
My point is just that your objection persists irrespective of a set’s actual cost, so you’re not actually making an argument against the purchase of expensive sets like the Enterprise. From your argument, it necessarily follows that we ought not buy any set whatsoever (since every set is a “bad deal” in light of their dirt cheap raw materials).

>>11760297
What app is it? I'll download a virus I dont care

>>11760307
>That $130 set could probably be sold for $70 and still net Lego a profit.
this part blows my mind. typically a company sells to the store, which then needs to make profit.
so Lego sells to Walmart for $50, and Walmart sells it for $100.

but then Lego also sells it for $100. and I know that involves their own website/warehouse or store/employees.... but still seems like Lego gets double-profits somehow

>>11760323
that's like the Trading Card Game argument, where you think they are little squares of freaking PAPER yet there is massive amounts of artwork, gameplay, designing, and countless other factors involved besides just the paper & ink

>>11760324
>What app is it? I'll download a virus I dont care
just Google-search
Lego CMF 29 codes
and you'll find the app, but not the actual code numbers

>>11760294
I love robots and mechs of all shapes and sizes, no real affinity for Gundam (though I love Syd Mead’s Turn-A design). I’m afraid Exo Force mechs just don’t have “the juice” or, rather, look like absolute dogshit. And it’s odd because, years earlier with the Life on Mars theme, Lego did in fact design a couple serviceable utilitarian western-style mechs.

File: IMG_9285.jpg (153.8 KB)

153.8 KB JPG

>>11760336
>>11760294
I’ll say, i dug around a bit, and the white lightning looks pretty good, especially given its age.

>>11760323
No. The point is that the company is selling a product for far more than what it is objectionably worth.

>>11760344
Yes, sure, and that’s true whether they’re making a 20-30% profit on a small set or a 20-30% profit on a big set, you understand? So it follows from your view that one ought not buy ANY lego, yes?

>>11760245
>Being priced locked out of themes
Never thought it about it that way but I see it now. Jurassic Park and Animal Crossing for starters.

>>11760250
These things aren’t for (you) now.
You’re not the kind of fan they want.

>>11760353
>We shouldn't buy any overpriced Lego
You're acting like I disagree with this sentiment

>>11760328
Nta but personally I don't think trading cards are expensive but I do feel the reseller market makes them out to be more important than they actually are. Yes, it's just paper and ink compared to Lego. Cards are some shit that could be instantly ruined by holding it wrong or a spilled drink ruining the value. That's crazy. That's why it amazes me that people still buy shit like sports cards as investments with almost zero resale value (unless of course it's a famous player, out of the entire team during that season. In which case what is more important is the historical significance and not actually the baseball card being a baseball card). Like 2 years ago I got into Garbage Pail Kids cards and was excited for the future and during the 40th anniversary they did a tiny run of their anniversary cards. They got immediately scalped. And to make matters worse they were already going for like $80 a box MSRP. That's just way too much for paper and glue and ink, and I'm not going to support that shit so I bowed out and stuck with the Minifigures and comics.

>>11760371
>they did a tiny run of their anniversary cards
Forgot to mention, a tiny run only available on the Topps.com website. What kind of retard thinks celebrating the 40th anniversary in that way was a good idea?? How the fuck do you celebrate new cards without any cards being available to normal people?

To go back on topic, Lego really needs to chill the fuck down. I love Lego Star Wars but feel like the Smart Brick and the $1,000 Death Slice are some of the dumbest shit they've gotten themselves into since the UCS Falcon and ATAT.

>>11760370
>overpriced Lego
But, for you, “overpriced Lego” is redundant, because, like you’ve identified, all of it is made out of dirt cheap plastic and sold at exceptionally high margins. You’re opposed to buying Lego as such, right?

>>11760344
Extremely bolshevik thinking. When does a profit margin go from acceptable to not? How is a company expected to grow and expand with small profit?

File: 75810-1.original.png (1.6 MB)

1.6 MB PNG

>>11760371
>trading cards are expensive
I was simply using that as an easy example of hidden costs outside of the materials involved.

it takes effort to "make" a Lego set outside of the small amount of plastic. (creative design, engineering, package art, instructions, all kinds of stuff!)

I get the argument. all the invisible costs do not scale. it takes just as much (kinda) effort to create a $20 set vs a $500 set

if you want to go extreme, Warhammer has probably the largest gap between tiny-amount-of-plastic and price. $50 for a single microscopic guy and you even have to clip it off the sprues, glue it, and paint it yourself lol (but there's art sculpting and gameplay efforts there, too)

>>11760378
Yes.... why the fuck would you support this?

>>11760382
Yeah because the exorbitant profits lego has been seeing has really been producing such great products like smart brick, fifa sets, and.... chinese garbage meant to appeal to literal communists.

>>11760387
And without those margins a single failure of something like Smart Brick will kill the company for good. They're sure as hell not going to survive on the 100 people who just want more castles (only "fair" priced castles though).

>>11760397
Most companies wouldn't make such a massive fuck up because they wouldn't waste money on such obviously fruitless efforts you dumb fucker. I am shocked some faggot is actively defending a massive corporation price gouging and pushing anti consumer practices.

Just got the Batman big playset. Building it now. Had the Batmobile from before. What's a good Carmine Falcone fig head? I think the hair will be easy, but is there a cool sunglasses moustache head?

File: D5Zh7baohqFWqAeVRHGbhj.jpg (478.6 KB)

478.6 KB JPG

Forgot the pic.

File: 195686425195638.png (58.9 KB)

58.9 KB PNG

...and even more broken! Happy chicken jockey day.

File: LEGO_3221_alt4-975253000.jpg (263.3 KB)

263.3 KB JPG

For selling lego, particularly rare minifigs, do you guys prefer selling via ebay or bricklink? Setting up a store on bricklink for a few minifigs seems annoying but I feel like it would probably attract more people to the listings.

>>11760386
OK, Jesus, that was like pulling teeth. I’m not coming out in favour of or against Lego’s Luxury Brand, I’m just taking issue with your argument which, initially, seemed to be targeted at high cost sets ($130, $400+ sets).

File: 71oABmwqzWL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg (105.4 KB)

105.4 KB JPG

Seems like the Frog got banned, anyways gonna go to B&M to pick up some random bricks in a few days, maybe I'll get lucky but I doubt it outside of maybe finding some more cool technic stuff, also doing a full bucket full may be "fun" but gotta do some moving shit too and spray painting and building stuff, may even find more pneumatic shit if I'm lucky

>>11760477
reporting is broken, too

lol

File: 81va4jyLVNL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg (98.3 KB)

98.3 KB JPG

>>11760518
https://archive.palanq.win/toy/search/tnum/11759200/deleted/deleted/
not fully updated but you can see in the archives manually the posts, seems to go back a few threads too, Karmic more than anything with how annoying he is. also fuck you capcha

>>11760518
>>11760520
nobody cares schizo, quit shitting up our Lego threads

>>11760524
evading already? sad.

>>11760526
We're all sick to death of you and the frogs constant back and forth, filling the thread so it gets buried in page 3 or 4. Either talk about legos or just shut the fuck up already. Gloating about someone getting banned is bitch made behavior you schizoid.

It's not fucking fair bros, why is best girl $40?

>>11760528
You follow suite rat, nobody likes a fence shitter either.>>11760524

>>11760537
Learn english mate

>>11760538
Learn to not to reply to bait.

>>11760111
Checked
Have you thought about making sliding doors for it? You'd have to sacrifice some space to make them fit though.

>>11760209
A bunch of leaked star wars sets got delayed to 2027 cause of the fartbrick and mando movie, I dunno if that was one of them though.
>>11760297
Have any been found in the wild yet? They don't come out for another 3 weeks or so

>>11760624
Someone said they found them but never posted results. The grocery store near me started stocking CMFs with the D&D series and doesn’t give a fuck about shelf dates but I still haven’t seen them in the wild.

It took me a long time, but I now judge sets solely on their cuteness level. If I see a set and my heart goes: CUTE thats all that matters. Arguing over price, price per piece, display sets or licence shit is kinda cringe desu. It all comes down if you like a set or not.

>>11760624
>Have any been found in the wild yet? They don't come out for another 3 weeks or so
yeah. I had a friend that saw them in a Kohls but there were only 3 left, so he passed on 'em (he typically gets 1 of each and didn't want to remember which numbers to skip when he eventually finds a full box to look through)

the Kohls near me had a bunch of the new sets, those soccer things, the Mandalorian Razor Crest... but no CMFs. I don't know if somebody got them all or if they just didn't put them out yet

>>11760498
Pretty sure you want to avoid ebay like the plague especially as a seller.

>>11760532
Who?

>no one posting all the new ninjago leaks
lazy fucks!

>>11760697
Fuck off Frog.

>>11760387
>>11760400
you being poor is a complete non factor for lego decision making
lego is charging exorbitant prices because their customers are paying them
the entire point of a business is to have the line go up. Whether what theyre doing is morally correct, or whether their products are objectively "good" or advancing the medium technologically, does not come into consideration in the slightest
>I am shocked some faggot is actively defending a massive corporation price gouging and pushing anti consumer practices.
and I am shocked some broccoli head managed to live this long and not understand the most basic principles of running a business. Nobody is defending anything btw, we are trying to explain to you that you not liking smart brick or fifa sets literally does not matter at all. You dont matter. Morality doesnt matter in running a business and lego is not breaking any consumer laws anywhere.
Are they greedy jewish shitheads? Yes, they are. And they are allowed to be. And people pay for their overpriced shit and lego will keep upping the price ceiling as long as people keep paying

File: bbc.jpg (247.9 KB)

247.9 KB JPG

You can get this LEGO dildo for the low low price of just $160!

>>11760156
How is the lego fandom so depressing and optimistic at the same time? Every time the needle shifts ever so slightly it's suddenly "WE WON!" or "We are so back, baby!" I mean look at Bioniclefags with a Toa minifig in the upcoming CMF. You would have thought we had won a war.

>>11760156
How is it the Lego fandom is so depressing and optimistic at the same time? A small shift of the needle and it's "WE WON!" or "We are so back, baby!" Look at Bioniclefags and their Toa minifig.

>>11760720
>>11760721
Sorry I samefaged there. I kept getting error messages and thought my posts weren't getting through.

>>11760716
>And they are allowed to be.

That's where you're wrong kiddo. Greed isn't a virtue. Lego must be punished for it until they stop being greedy. Every person who defends greed (like you for instance) is evil and deserves to be tortured to death.

File: cty1920.jpg (56.2 KB)

56.2 KB JPG

>>11760716
all of this is true

but I can add that as long as Lego offers scraps to the poor; polybags, interesting $10-$30 sets, etc they can continue to hook new customers. they accept that loss (profit still, but non-max'd profit)

and Lego shouldn't be considered one-thing at this point. they sell Duplo, flowers, brickheads, Technic, girly Friends, minifig sets from the latest Marvel and Star Wars slop, all kinds of things, and while they will work-together, it's not meant to be sold to the same customer. a little bit of crying is allowed when Lego thinks Harry Potter is just as good as Castle, so we don't get Castle, but when you see Lego did a bunch of Soccer sets, you shouldn't get upset at the "waste" of sets

bottom line is I, personally, "vote" with my own dollars. I do want Star Trek Lego, but can't afford the one they offered. how did the rest of the world vote on that one? it's not up to me to count the votes

File: ninjago-summer-set-images-from-mastersofbrickjitzu-video-v0-m8e5713z3dvg1.jpg (36.8 KB)

36.8 KB JPG

Ninjago summer reveals

>>11760739
>That's where you're wrong kiddo. Greed isn't a virtue.
Did I say it was? How is any business in the world virtuous? Are you retarded?

>>11760752
I really like the new land bounty even if its smaller
The ultra dragon looks cool but I absolute despise the design on the great devourer
The whole point of the frills was to look like a crown so how do you fuck that up

Can't you 3D print knock off lego pieces?

File: 2026-1030x579_jpg.jpg (608.5 KB)

608.5 KB JPG

no Punisher for you, capeshitters

>>11760759
Retards in general (but especially in online spaces like this where everything must reduce to insult and disagreement) have a hard time disentangling descriptive and prescriptive claims. So if you say, “Lego will naturally market to wealthy non-discerning yuppies over poor cretinous 4chan whiners,” people think you’re making a moral claim and endorsing Lego’s behaviour instead of just describing it.

File: first-look-on-all-summer-wave-sets-dr4-part-2-legends-v0-v2gfqyrgucvg1.png (127.1 KB)

127.1 KB PNG

For some reason its slow to post so the rest are here if I can't post the rest:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Legoleak/comments/1sm7a6g/ninjago_summer_set_images_from/

>>11760763
Eh, it's Legends so its more alternate reality stuff I guess

>>11760752
>>11760763
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emTopgo3c2g
not a fan of the new land bounty, glad i picked up a temple bounty when it was on sale
the new transforming dragon mech looks actually good, and we finally get a new wyldfyre with it
other than that the twin mechs look pretty solid, but every other set is meh, the new elemental ice and fire monsters look pretty neat at least

>>11760772
>>11760768
>>11760752
>the awful capcha is preventing leakshit dump spam
Well, it now has that positive going for it.

>>11760776
>official reveals are leaks
you are actually as low IQ as you appear huh

>>11760772
Yeah but it just kinda ends up looking like some random snake and not THE snake.
The devourer has a very simple and straight-foward design so when you take away the one thing that makes it unique it just no longer looks like it
But whatever it's clearly not the main build of the set and as long as this design choice doesn't bleed into the show or Legacy I'm good.

>>11760776
>>11760778
How long has this retarded anti-leak crusade been going on? I sort of come and go from Lego general, and the last time I was active here, I don’t remember threads being full of “fuck off froggy” and “kys pedo” and gruesome descriptions of self-harm and generally unpleasant, mean vibes

>>11760781
>anti leak crusade
its literally just one mentally ill schizo

>>11760783
Yeah, I’m asking about his crusade. When did this actually start?

>>11760785
Idk probably whenever his parents didn't get him diagnosed for severe autism

>>11760785
Sometime after the “new thread?” spamshit started. It sure gets annoying with half the thread filled up with pictures of instagram walls of text or the same reposts of reposts of reposts.
I support the “schizo”.
You want better “vibes”?
Be the change you want to see.
Post your legos, post a moc, post something you just got, post literally anything that isn’t some thinly veiled product engagement and stop bitching.

File: absman.jpg (46.3 KB)

46.3 KB JPG

Absolute DC sets when?

>>11760814
Fuck off.

>>11760799
>>11760781
This all started due to the one guy spamming the catalog with 50 threads along with flooding them with low quality “leaks”/official picture crap, so some pushback had to come from all that.

>>11760716
How do you not recognize that these practices are not good for the company in the long run? The reality is that when you go hunting for the big fish and specialize your tools to catch them you are left fucked when those fish die off.

>>11760828
You're just poor and cant afford toys maybe you should collect something cheaper like pocket lint you peasant

>>11760828
Lego is releasing more and more varied sets today than ever before. They’re selling more “high end” sets as a matter of proportion than in decades past, but it’s not as though 18+ black box statues have altogether replaced cheap sets. In terms of absolute numbers, it wouldn’t surprise me if you have more cheap sets to choose from today than 20 years ago. Right now, you can hop onto lego’s website and buy 400 sets for 25-50 Canadian funbucks and about as many for less than $25.

>>11760834
>Hur dur you're just poor.
Nice cope faggot. Not everyone is a displayslop corporate shill. Why would I bother buying the new shit when I can easily piece together sets and make my own MOCs using far cheaper aftermarket parts?

>>11760842
I like big expensive complicated sets and I’m tired of pretending I don’t :^)

File: col09-15.png (206.8 KB)

206.8 KB PNG

>>11760696
Posting images was broken for me for awhile last night but the cmf forest maiden.

>>11760781
Hmm feels like at least half a year now, the anti leaker guy is a nutter so we mostly ignore him. It was particularly annoying when he would spawn camp making a new general and then try and declare no leak as if he was a janny, instead of just making his own moc threads.Frankly I think it's connected to the failed moc thread attempt, the posts read the same level of deranged seethe as they did back then.

>>11760844
>>11760834
You already got wiped once.

What lego sets currently available are good parts packs? I don't buy new lego too often but I like making mocs and wanted to know which sets have newer useful pieces in them. Ideally around £30

File: IMG_4585.jpg (2.9 MB)

2.9 MB JPG

>>11760873
This

>>11760876
I already have those 3 sets. Got them separately though. I'm just looking for a lot of new weird parts they've put out in the past 5 years or so.

>>11760864
I don’t know what you mean, and additionally you’re relying to two separate people.

>>11760828
2025 was their best financial result in all of company history. You are a child and you think lego not appealing to you and your financial ability is this huge long term mistake. It literally isn't, the pokemon sets sold out instantly. You don't matter

>>11760858
Yeah, people complain (rightly) about the leaker’s legendary spergout, but we also had like two weeks where the anti-leaker kept trying to pre-empt the leaker’s new threads (I guess because he didn’t like a new product being used as the thread image?), or where he’d post a new thread shortly after the shill had posted his, and so we had this retarded duelling generals period as though we were in the Nanboku-cho era with its northern and southern courts.
Everyone needs to be at least 33.3333% less autistic and annoying please

Imagine being this mentally ill over plastic bricks, lmao

>>11760883
Just dig through a flea market then
>>11760894
And you like being inside kids.

>>11760896
That and janny inactivity.

>>11760898
You need some new material, schizo

>>11760900
Do you like getting banned?

>>11760897
Imagine entering the 18+ SFW children's toy board on an anime website to discuss plastic building blocks and then acting superior to other posters.

File: lego order.jpg (521.5 KB)

521.5 KB JPG

Bricklink order, the ones without instructions are surfer rescue, throwbot torch, research glider and scorpian tracker.

>>11760718
>He's crying about a gift with purchase
>Not the fact that for like the second year in a row Lego isn't giving out a free trinket like the metal coins for free but now have to waste 2,500 VIP points for the trinket

>>11760852
It was broken for most people yesterday. Pass users uploaded just fine though. Funny how that works.

>>11760906
>noooooo please let me act like a manchild over childrens plastic toys
lmao

>>11760920
I only want you to recognize where you are posting right now, and deeply consider whether or not being the the most mentally stable poster here is worth acting superior about.

Posting any better here?

>>11760925
>like being the smartest kid with Down’s syndrome

>>11760927
I still can't do images for whatever reason but I'm able to post without them now semi reliably. What's the deal? Is this a captcha DDOS or something?

>>11760902
I wouldn’t know, I’ve never been banned

>>11760929
shits been borked for like 36 hours and the mods are being cagey about what's going on

>>11760935
It’s a cloudflare thing. Jeet programmers I suspect. They rolled out an update and broke the functionality.
GIGO

>>11760935
Last year around this time the site got nuked right? I wonder if this will be an annual thing

>>11760925
>we cant have civil discussion b-because we just cant okay, were a shithole and should always act as retarded as possible
lmao

>>11760938
>CHICKEN JOCKEY!

>>11760908
>now have to waste 2,500 VIP points for the trinket
We knew this was going to happen as soon as they let you scan barcodes for points

>>11760940
Reflect on your own posts and see if they represent civil discussion.

>fifa world cup is on backorder
wait people want that disgusting piece of shit

>>11760979
>nooo please let me act like a manchild over plastic bricks
lmao

File: tumblr_3bbcf4f7923bbf47dd9457f91bcf35ed_2b535d60_1280.jpg (138.4 KB)

138.4 KB JPG

Why did the ucs set have to be mandalorianshit

>>11760986
Those are bots, not humans. Also somebody quickly refresh biog

>Error: Upload Failed
Is uploading images still down for others?

>>11761000
it was apparently not because of the Disney series they made a bunch of sets for. which begs why it had to be that dumpster ass rebuild one from Disney instead of the yellow one from episode 1.

>sexually aroused to female lego minifigure

>>11761042
Mostly yes. I’ve had about a 10% success rate on other boards. But cannot get in /lg/

File: 1776309423613.jpg (14.6 KB)

14.6 KB JPG

>>11761042
let's see

File: LEGO-Batman_Legacy-of-the-Dark-Knight-Absolute-Batman-Absolute-Catwoman-Poster-EMBED-2026.jpg (346 KB)

346 KB JPG

Absolute Batman will be in new lego batman game, sets when?

>>11761120
Go fuck yourself.

File: YOUTUBE-LEGO-NINJAGO-71863-Zilvar-and-Gramtak-1-1200x675.jpg (104.2 KB)

104.2 KB JPG

Lego are idiots, they do a reveal video and then not post official pictures afterwards?

File: YOUTUBE-LEGO-NINJAGO-71864-Kai-and-Coles-Combiner-Vehicles-1-1200x675.jpg (98.2 KB)

98.2 KB JPG

>>11761122
Why?

File: YOUTUBE-LEGO-NINJAGO-71868-Wyldfyres-Transforming-Dragon-Mech-3-1200x675.jpg (125.5 KB)

125.5 KB JPG

>>11761124

>>11761123
>>11761124
You are the worst poster on this board.

File: YOUTUBE-LEGO-NINJAGO-71869-Land-Bounty-2-1200x675.jpg (104.7 KB)

104.7 KB JPG

>>11761125
I love the new land bounty

File: YOUTUBE-LEGO-NINJAGO-71871-Battle-at-the-Dragons-Blade-2-1200x675.jpg (113.9 KB)

113.9 KB JPG

>>11761128
Legends cooked bros, $90 for pic related is a steal

>>11761127
Ok, why

File: YOUTUBE-LEGO-NINJAGO-71872-Ultra-Dragon-Battle-3-1200x675.jpg (122.2 KB)

122.2 KB JPG

>>11761129

>>11761129
>>11761128
>>11761125
You have ruined all lego discussion for the past 4 years and continue to play coy, genuinely the worst scum.

File: spider-man-76530-spider-man-vs-hulk-at-the-officr-building-v0-86vb7di6edvg1.jpg (64.9 KB)

64.9 KB JPG

>>11761131
I think you get me confused pal, these are just official lego sets people want to see

File: marvel-76349-spider-man-prison-transport-chase-v0-b4tpkv8egdvg1.jpg (87.8 KB)

87.8 KB JPG

>>11761132
Nothing wrong in looking at new sets and preparing your financial savings to buy them

>>11761132
>not even trying to change up how you talk
Get banned again scum.

File: marvel-76346-spider-man-figure-v0-6oclybfffdvg1.jpg (56 KB)

56 KB JPG

>>11761134
Never has been lol, you got me confused sir. Also, these sets help people decide how to save money and spend on other sets and so on. Talk lego or leave sir.

>>11761135
>>11761133
>same phrasing
Get a new gimmick rodent. People see through your shit and so do staff.

File: 630.jpg (33.1 KB)

33.1 KB JPG

>the INSTANT the laggy capcha even slightly lets up the pedoshill starts flooding the general with goyslop again
It’s all so tiresome

>>11761139
Speak english

>>11761141
Go back to france rodent.

File: the-final-battle-ocarina-of-time-set-77093-zelda-lego-site-3031656382.jpg (264 KB)

264 KB JPG

Gentlemen how do we stop black baseplate displayslop?

>>11761150
Gun

>>11761120
I like that Catwoman. She looks like a fighter pilot

>>11761137
Huh?

>>11761150
This and Himeji are two of my favourite sets, and they’re both black box black plate displayslop. And so help me god, if the Sagrada comes out and it’s black plate, I’ll love it too.
>>11761129
Don’t care at all about ninjago, but I love the way they’re playing with scale in this set. The (near?) life-sized katana jutting out looks very cool.
What is “ninjago legends” anyway? Is it just like, the “premium” ninjago sets?
>>11761139
>>11761137
>>11761134
You need to settle down.

>>11761154
>>11761155
Die.

>>11761150
lmao Zelda looks like she has some sort of raygun instead of a spell effect

>>11761162
You appear not to have settled down

>>11761164
Yeah, I like the set a lot, but I don’t display it with the stupid beam. It really should just be a ray of light, right?

>>11761164
>>11761167
I also don’t quite get why link is leaping from a tower. When does this happen?

File: eh72v2.png (387.2 KB)

387.2 KB PNG

>>11761167
>It really should just be a ray of light, right?
Yeah its a big ray of light

>>11761175
What’s the best way to make this effect? 50 of the dish pieces the set comes with?

File: cylinder.jpg (130.8 KB)

130.8 KB JPG

>>11761182
Maybe one of these pieces in translucent yellow

>>11761091
See this Absolute Catwoman. >>11761120

File: 77093-1.jpg (298.7 KB)

298.7 KB JPG

>>11761129
how is that Ninjago set $90 but muh-Zelda set is $130?

Lego inconsistency can be infuriating

>>11761190
Lego is all about consistency

File: zilvar.jpg (151.3 KB)

151.3 KB JPG

New katana holder piece coming in summer sets, dragon claws for the ninja too. The new tiger is called Zilvar and will be this summer antagonist probably, found in the cheapest set too. I think next year we might finally get a Chima crossover...

>>11761190
Easy, ninjago set is an in house set, zelda is a licensed set so lego has to pay nintendo a license fee to use their IP. Lego owns ninjago so all money go to lego pockets meanwhile a part of the money on licensed sets go to the licensor, which is weird why lego focuses so much on licenses. I guess they found putting too much resources in making original stuff is more expensive than paying license tax and inflating prices foe profit.

File: HF9HBnVbQAAKmq8.jpg (287 KB)

287 KB JPG

>2 snakes and big snake in a 4+ set
Must buy

>>11761197
Fuck off

>>11761201
Why are you so mean? You always derail lego discussion, so primitive

>>11761202
You are the worst poster on this board. Fuck, off.

>>11761204
Nah that's you, at least shill-kun talks about lego, you just have a tantrum all day

>>11761207
Talking to yourself about leakshit that literally nobody besides yourself responds to does not count as discussion, it counts as spam, spammer.

>>11761208
you think everyone is the same guy, you have truly been mindbroken

>>11761209
And you have done the exact same shit on multiple occasions of accusing other anons of being me pedo-kun so seeing an ED page on you wouldn’t be too surprising at this point rodent.

>>11761211
You're literally talking to a random poster, but your deranged mind has made it so you think everyone is your enemy, get some help mate