Thread #219809546
File: l-intro-1748553386.jpg (485.7 KB)
485.7 KB JPG
>the time travel already happened in the future.
why do people dislike this so much? makes sense to me
35 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>219811430
I think Donnie Darko solves this. The mistake is believing causality is actually taking place right in front of your face with observable events. If life is one great physical-spiritual omnibus moving through the universe, "God" or whatever you call it, then the individual's actions are highly predicted but they aren't necessary. The broad strokes of causality are set on a scale far beyond the individual, and the world flows around whatever tiny inputs are made.
It solves the paradox in situations like this, but still implies true time travel to the past is impossible, because the whole of causality can't be rolled back. If the past exists and you make contact with it, nothing could happen there to fundamentally alter the trunk of reality. They probably could've revealed themselves to themselves without anything happening, but if they tried to do it during a pivotal battle, someone would just die or suffer misfortune because the result is already written, and that's with fantasy magic. In reality it will take crazy technology to access even the individual visionary level of time travel.
As for why the so-called individual has such power to defy causality, we're still way bigger and heavier than almost all life. Humans have significant gravity in the landscape of causality, just none compared to the whole.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>219809546
it implies no free will which isn't a problem logically but it also requires the universe somehow enforce a time traveler to not be able to change the past to not break causality which becomes quickly convoluted.
it's easier for the universe to just not allow time travel at all like in ours.
>>
>>219812842
Lots of things could happen that are more possible than time travel. Maybe people just decide not to act on the time traveler's revelations, or maybe they forget. Maybe the person you tell steps on a lego and dies
>>
>>219812842
>requires the universe somehow enforce a time traveler to not be able to change the past to not break causality which becomes quickly convoluted.
no it doesn't. causality occurs naturally when the time travel is integrated in the current timeline
>>
>>219813411
The real problem is how did Harry see himself in the bush before it happened the first time. Either the movie isn't the first time it happened, (multiple timelines) free will doesn't exist at all and time travel is just an aspect of immutable causality, or something else.
>>
>>219813800
I guess if we're constructing a pseudo theory of time travel, he wouldn't see himself "the first time" and the past people he later interacts with are only shades without free will. Or rather, you touch the stalk of your own life at an earlier point and it can react a little bit. "the past" would be a sort of dreamworld, like the tangent universe, that's largely deterministic and spooky liminal. Similar to hell.
They make major changes by freeing Sirius and Morty invents rock n' roll, but time travel IRL would probably be more abstract than that. More like the bunny mask burned into people's minds.
>>
>>
File: 1703667594635865.webm (3.2 MB)
3.2 MB WEBM
Who was in the wrong here?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>219809546
They hate it philosophically, not logically. Closed time loops mean that the entire timeline is fixed, at all points, at all times. Nothing "matters" on the grandest scale because existence will play out exactly as it plays out. Some people cannot emotionally handle being nothing more than a cog in a machine, which can never rise to be anything more than a cog.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>219811430
So what happens if the loop is broken and Hermione decides not to use the time turner? Does the timeline change and Harry and Sirius are killed by the dementors or does the universe corrects to keep Harry alive? Harry has a prophecy he is destined to fulfill after all...
>>
>>
File: 1615080290701.jpg (69 KB)
69 KB JPG
>>219809546
Wish I could go back in time to early 2000s, I could fix everything.
>>
>>219817126
Why would Hermione ever decide that, though? There's no other way to save Buckbeak and Sirius, Dumbledore himself told her. And she's still in her naive student phase, hence Dumbeldore would know best.
>>
>>
File: 30109a9093f879b8df7a0987c83b46be.jpg (25.6 KB)
25.6 KB JPG
>>219812680
I remember reading a newspaper article around the time *Prisoner of Azkaban* was released; it mentioned how much the kids had grown and noted that Emma Watson's breasts had taken shape, making her look quite like a young lady... I recall there was also talk about whether or not to replace the actress because the kids were growing up so fast.
>>
>>