>>219815588
the unsimulated parts were done with porno actors

Oreo

>>219815848
This.
Von Trier did the same trick in The Idiots and Antichrist.

>The joke is... le sex!

>>219816506
>joke
Have you seen it? Its hardly a comedy.

>>219815588
Mia Goth has a lovely fat juicy tongue

>>219815848
>>219816445
tbqh, he won. there was not a single instance i could call it fake. it was so well done given its budget.

>>219816506
>t. didnt watch either of them
dont shit the thread.

File: Rome (2005) - S01E05 - The Ram Has Touched The Wall (1080p BluRay x265 afm72).webm (135.5 KB)

135.5 KB WEBM

>>219815588
>High libido women exist

Oreo

>>219816533
It's very comedic. He just has a spectacularly dry, Danish sense of humor.

>>219815588
Is it based or woke?

File: 19.jpg (162.8 KB)

162.8 KB JPG

>>219815588
Why did she do it?

File: IMG_1442.jpg (169.5 KB)

169.5 KB JPG

>>219817600
He about to get laid the fuck out

>>219817600
she needed the bbc pipe

weren't these movies about himself?

>>219817600
She had to humiliate her kids, they were making a move

>>219817698
That was The house thay Jack built

>>219818249
on the hill

>>219815588
Mia Goth really did pee and the anal alleway scene seemed realistic bc of her white skin/medium sized ass and a pain-pleasure expression she makes
Charlotte dp is a mystery bc they did superimpose her face (which looks the face 2 or 3 times during the scene) but the bodybis exactly like hers down to thigh lenght, nipple/size form etc.
It's as if they tried to confuse things by cutting and pasting her face over her face to have plausible deniability

>>219819177
The upper half is her body. The bottom half is a porn actor's. It's not that complicated.

>>219819207
Mia or Charlotte? The bodies look to be both them 100% imo

>>219819262
Charlotte. Referring specifically to the infamous DP scene. That's clearly not what her butt looks like.

>>219817155
This, Von Trier is funny as fuck. Watch the Kingdom.

>>219819277
The legs and pointy tits look exactly like hers and not like the supposed pornstar double (whose name is onnthd credits)

>>219816445
He couldn't use the real actors, because Willem Dafoe's dick is distractingly big.

>>219815588
Sex isnt real, its a psych-op to you get to kiss girls

>>219817600
To re-live her hoe phase now shes a tired milf and white guys wont hit

>>219819671
MOOOT
MOOOOOT

>>219815588
>asexuals… are le evil!!
seriously after all everything this is what lars wanted the moral of the movie to be?

>>219815588
>Yvan Attal, the Franco-British actress’s partner, says her performance in a series of often painfully degrading scenes has had dramatic consequences for the family
>Speaking on French television, he said their children’s school-friends had nicknamed her Oreo - in reference to Nabisco’s chocolate and cream biscuits - because a promotional photograph for the movie showed her naked between two black actors.
>“When you….hear that your mother is an Oreo and a thingamajig…,’ Mr Attal said, leaving the sentence unfinished in a sign of his embarrassment.

Long Live French Empire.

>>219815588
Is this actually good or is it just sex that is the gimmick?

>>219815588
I want to watch this movie just for the DP scene

>>219820590
It's actually good.
Don't be one of those zoomers that simply can't watch something because it has "le sex" in it.

>>219817020
women are horny as fuck. they love sex. just not with you.

>>219821811
I'm not a zoomer and that's not what I did.
No one I ever heard about these movies has ever mentioned anything but sex (including you).

So what's good about the movie?

>>219821845
No they're not

>>219819671
body double btw

>>219820574
A woman old enough to have school age children was cast in this kind of movie? They couldn't get a 20-something?

>>219821958
>You will get X amount of dollars to literally take a dick in the ass while we digitally replace your face with someone else

I honestly can't decide if this is better or worse than an actual porn shoot

>>219821887
The good part is that it uses sex in the movie for a greater purpose to the narrative. It does give coomers something to look at, sure, but the good part is the examination of the characters and why they are like what they are like, and why they do what they do.
It's not super deep, but it is much deeper than "dude sex" on a psychological level.

>>219821958
No idea how someone could mistake this for the De Palma film, but whatever I guess.

>>219819671
>Sharing the same hole
kinda zesty

>>219821989
Because they had to show the actress across a span of years and it's cheaper to age people down with makeup. This is Dogma 95 101

>>219824023
>This is Dogma 95 101
Are you talking about Kevin Smith's Dogma or is there an old film manual called Dogma95?

|| spoiler test ||

this one should work

>>219817155
>>219819312
okay so i am not a dane and didnt catch any bit of humour whatsoever. its also not true that i found it disturbing except the self-abortion scene because female genital mutilation or even male for that matter is the only thing that disturbs me in the actual sense of the word.
so could you name a few scenes and what was funny about them ?? asking this in good faith.

>>219817546
the woman is based while the man is woke except at the end.

>>219824917
not either of those posters, and while Lars DOES have a bit of a tongue in cheek sense of humor, it's not really that present in this movie. You have to look at the context of the movie being made during his depression arc and it clearly reflects that. Any kind of humor in this is basically the "haha doesn't life suck for some people? yeah lmao" vibe like the end or maybe the scene with her in the group sex therapy class where she proudly states that she is a whore. You also have that infamous DP scene where the two dudes end up just fighting with each other and thats a bit comical

>>219817600
se called them niggers so its ok she's basef

>>219824286
Pretty much the latter. Dogme 95 was Lars von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg's film movement made to go against genre conventions and the overreliance of tech on film production.

Vinterberg's The Celebration and Harmony Korine's Julien Donkey-Boy were made under the movement.

>>219815588
Yes? They were very open about filming porn actors unsimulated for the sex scenes.

>>219817600
she was a nymphomaniac, didn't you pay attention?

>>219819207
That doesn't make much sense because the part that's superimposed is just the face, there's an obvious disconnect with the body from the neck down. There's no line between the bottom half and top half.

>>219822247
>will get X amount of dollars to literally take a dick in the ass
Literally their normal job

>>219826091
>There's no line between the bottom half and top half
Look at >>219819671 carefully
Or better yet, don't

>>219821989
She plays the character in middle age, we see her as a young woman played by Stacy Martin as well.

>>219819429
then just the pussy was CG'd in from the porn acress, easy

File: 1280px-Dogme28.jpg (568.6 KB)

568.6 KB JPG

>>219824286
von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg in the 90s were tired of glossy studio films and wanted to push themselves and others toward a more raw and stripped down kind of film so they drew up a manifesto to adhere to. The ten rules were
>Shooting must be done on location. Props and sets must not be brought in (if a particular prop is necessary for the story, a location must be chosen where this prop is to be found).
>The sound must never be produced apart from the images or vice versa. (Music must not be used unless it occurs where the scene is being shot.)
>The camera must be hand-held. Any movement or immobility attainable in the hand is permitted.
>The film must be in colour. Special lighting is not acceptable. (If there is too little light for exposure the scene must be cut or a single lamp be attached to the camera.)
>Optical work and filters are forbidden.
>The film must not contain superficial action. (Murders, weapons, etc. must not occur.)
>Temporal and geographical alienation are forbidden. (That is to say that the film takes place here and now.)
>Genre movies are not acceptable.
>The film format must be Academy 35 mm.
>The director must not be credited.
They of course fudged the rules themselves at a few points in that period but there were a few dozen films done by either them or other directors following the Dogme 95 manifesto until they finished up its usage in the 2000s.

>>219826398
>>The director must not be credited.
Lol. Why?

File: 85059197-3043094621.jpg (108.7 KB)

108.7 KB JPG

>>219817600
To make her father proud.

>>219821887
>So what's good about the movie?
Find yourself dumbfuck. I hate retards like you. Fucking dunce.

>>219826518
To let the work speak for itself without them "claiming" it apparently

>>219819429
>legs
Legs look like legs, they're not distinctive