Thread #12512443
File: reeee.jpg (101.2 KB)
101.2 KB JPG
Let’s settle this: which version of RE is the best?
19 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>12512443
I like Remake but I think it's more of a companion piece to RE1 that should only be experienced once you've played both Chris and Jill's scenarios on the PS1. I don't see Remake as a replacement for RE1. I find it disrespectful to just how fucking good RE1 is to tell new fans not to bother with what is arguably the peak of the classic tank control series.
PS1 RE1 strengths:
>Extremely tight pacing, almost no filler even if it does dip a bit in the guard house.
>More branching routes and decisions (REmake removed them)
>Garishly colourful and surreal mansion >Amazing B-Movie FMVs
>Better soundtrack (Original and Director’s Cut, non-Dual Shock)
Not to mention it’s just a milestone of gaming history and anyone who likes horror games should play it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1747202182026296.jpg (164.6 KB)
164.6 KB JPG
Not the one that drained all the color out of Jill's design, that's for sure.
>>
File: 79879fd0ec66d3af98236acedd1422c2.jpg.jpg (136.9 KB)
136.9 KB JPG
>>12512818
remake vampire jill be like:
>>
>>
>>12512451
remake adds too many more items and the need to carry certain items that then require more trips to the save room. at least it has excellent save room music. i replayed it earlier this year and was surprised how absurd the item management is in it, and then did a run of the original and it felt swifter than it had by comparison. it isn’t the end of the world for remake but it’s one of those flaws that the game can’t overcome, it drags at times. i think it’s worth playing, but for me it’s less enjoyable gaming. it’s not without exasperation from all the extra legwork with backtracking and item nonsense, which is quite a bit more than the original, a game that was already slow.
>>
>>
>>