more context about where you got the picture might help. I don't think the anything's wrong with the fingers. 'strawberry' could also be fine if the paper is smudged. the paper also seem to have dirt spots, which I don't think AI would unless you specifically ask for it. I think the biggest tell that it might be AI is the very soft even lighting. AI will do perfect lighting unless you specify otherwise. the lighting looks professionally done, so it may just be AI-enhanced lighting

>>1566735
A profile picture of an average joe on Twitter. It's spelled straweerry here and the letters are warped. Maybe it's smudged, but the photo felt off for some reason.

File: ai.png (1.9 MB)

>>1566731
the edges of the table don't line up correctly, so I'm willing to believe it's AI

>>1566731
absolutely
if it was really then some fancy photography was used to take this bland photograph
his body and the pizza are in focus but the the top top of te box aren't in focus
there is too little space between the table and his seat
the table has a different edge on the left of his lower hand to the right of it
His seat has no back

>>1566737
ohh good catch.
>>1566780
yeah. Thanks, anons.

Already looks like slop on the thumbnail, maybe due to the lighting.

>>1566731
It's Photoshopped.

Yes it’s ai. Lots of twitter profiles are Indians.

>>1566731
jumbled text is always a dead giveaway that it's ai. if you catch more blatantly obvious ai images you'll be able to tell by the lighting like >>1567040 said, ai images always have a mexico filter combined with a desaturation filter that makes the colors look off
with anime art you'll be able to tell its ai when the blush lines are too curved/jagged, same with the clothing material

I thought a pajeet was an Indian, not an Arab.