Thread #42242058
Why is everyone sleeping on the Giants were real conspiracy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfrKqGuOhgQ&list=PL6WEhQPTQUSXKpXbJoJj lhNJHhFI_qdHE&index=1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CiQTBOQ1dTg
75 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
File: Petrified Toes.jpg (102.3 KB)
102.3 KB JPG
>>42242065
I think the Pygmies of Africa might be the result of genetic tampering either done by an advanced antediluvian race or NHI's. Dwarfism in people and animals could be a residual consequence of this genetic modification. Perhaps they were trying to shrink the giants over generations in order to make them more managable.
>>
>>
>>
>>42242058
>be 5ft tall neolithic fertility goddess simp
>be chilling, farmfagging, jerking off
>one day a horde of 7ft tall snow-white golden haired chads ride into town in chariots
>they plow your sister and burn your field
>your friend got trampled to death
>you hid in a cave until they left
>40 years later, you tell your grandkids about the scary violent “giant” men
>the story’s details get spiced up a bit
>>
>>
>>42242058
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3f01Tn9OPq0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_MV_DOOwBI
I don't believe it's theory anymore. This guy has so much data and evidence its fact but it would break down normies world view so this guy stays silenced. He submits papers to universities and they refuse to talk to him and he is never disproved just ignored.
>>
>>42242058
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRuxw-nZoJw
Forgot this one. 200 million years old.
This is not erosion that is just delusional copium to say so we can rule that out. So either someone chiseled this footprint in for art or to troll or this footprint is real. The fact that the mud was lifted at the toes is a key factor in determining this is real af.
>>
>>42243072
based
>>42243089
This might be a factor. “But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men’s faces; you yourselves do not enter, nor will you let in those who wish to enter.”
>>42243428
Wow, great video!
>>
>>
>>
File: rhodonite-pyroxmangite-100b-600x412.jpg (41.6 KB)
41.6 KB JPG
Lots of rocks seem to be once living tissue ....
>>
>>42243372
Mudfossils are complete blithering nonsense and this idiot wouldn't know a fact if you dropped the complete Funk And Wagnell's on his head.
>>42243428
Someone chiseled this footprint in for art.
The fact it's in granite should be the giveaway.
>>
File: An Amazing Heart Stone!.webm (2.6 MB)
2.6 MB WEBM
>>42244724
100% this. Just walk around your area look for rocks shaped like biological hearts. They're everywhere.
>>
>>
File: 1774880684982714.png (65.8 KB)
65.8 KB PNG
>>42246410
Hello, agent Smith.
>>
File: Sandwich Islands snake.png (1.9 MB)
1.9 MB PNG
>>42243372
Roger is great in that he got the ball rolling on mudfossil/floodfossil theory, but a lot of his takes are outright wrong or based on iffy evidence.
>>
>>
File: queen of the desert joshua tree national park.jpg (704 KB)
704 KB JPG
Would you?
>>
>>
File: Womb Cave Bulgaria Ready to Settle Down.jpg (136.9 KB)
136.9 KB JPG
>>42247158
0.o
>>
File: Naka Cave.jpg (555.9 KB)
555.9 KB JPG
>>
File: Table-de-Jugurtha-7 Giant Tree Fossil.jpg (185.3 KB)
185.3 KB JPG
>>
File: Giant Fist Rock With Normal Human for Reference.jpg (89.5 KB)
89.5 KB JPG
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (49.5 KB)
49.5 KB JPG
>>
File: 178ae96a188590d0bcecd0184ffddd92.jpg (84.6 KB)
84.6 KB JPG
>>
File: b3e5b2d7bbd800db44ffb66c81eade05.png (2.7 MB)
2.7 MB PNG
>>
File: Profile Rock, Massachusettes.jpg (54.5 KB)
54.5 KB JPG
>>
File: 1727003672170116.jpg (84.2 KB)
84.2 KB JPG
>>42246168
If it was chiseled with primitive tools, the imprint wouldn't be nearly as smooth as it appears in the video. Also, are you saying they chiseled out that part at the top where the upset substrate was pushed out above the print? That would be a relief carving which is much harder than a regular stone carving. The footprint is more likely natural than not.
>>
File: sn_grandpa03.jpg (162.1 KB)
162.1 KB JPG
>>
File: elephant-rock-iceland.jpg (139.4 KB)
139.4 KB JPG
>>
File: Michael Tellinger Petrified Heart.jpg (512.1 KB)
512.1 KB JPG
>>42243428
>Michael Tellinger
I forgot about this guy. He's done some great work.
>>
File: JVE21_01.jpg (21.7 KB)
21.7 KB JPG
>>
File: Camel or Sheep Snout.jpg (1.7 MB)
1.7 MB JPG
>>
File: Turtle shell.jpg (101.8 KB)
101.8 KB JPG
>>
File: 137926930_36edf1209e.jpg (101.8 KB)
101.8 KB JPG
>>
File: 2384155_adc81c9b.jpg (100.9 KB)
100.9 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: Croc Mudfossil.mp4 (2.1 MB)
2.1 MB MP4
>>42248301
>>
>>
File: giant mudfossil head1.jpg (82.6 KB)
82.6 KB JPG
It's some crazy shit that is completely dismissed by mainsteam academia
>>
File: Giant Martian Head.jpg (47.1 KB)
47.1 KB JPG
Don't forgrt Mars!
>>
File: Giant Martian Parrot M1402185.jpg (309.8 KB)
309.8 KB JPG
>>42248543
>>
File: Giant Martian Head.png (584.6 KB)
584.6 KB PNG
>>42248543
The link in that image is has been updated to the following: https://viewer.mars.asu.edu/viewer/moc/M0200164#T=2&P=M0200164
>>
>>42248207
You can see right there it's not all that smooth. You're assuming that part was even carved and not a natural feature purposely incorporated into it. And again it's granite, which forms from molten rock deep beneath the surface. Even the guy in the photograph says it's completely natural. (Robert Schoch, poster boy for the extra-ancient pyramid crowd) I would be willing to at least entertain the possibility it's a natural formation modified by humans.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1729817063459279.jpg (147.4 KB)
147.4 KB JPG
>>42250732
True.
>>
File: media-4054834808.jpg (51.7 KB)
51.7 KB JPG
>>42248814
No, it's a natural formation which geology calls boulders but are actual giant petrified toes. Use your eyes- all three of them. Just watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BgtKaNi6i8 The guy is examining and feeling it but concludes (incorrectly imo) that it is a natural rock formation. It is clearly a natural formation, but I seriously believe that it is a set of petrified giant toes. (all posts made by this IP address are satire- present, past or future).
>>
>>
>>
File: Ouro Nguerou, Mali.png (2.3 MB)
2.3 MB PNG
>>
>>
File: Puppy Mountain, China.png (736.8 KB)
736.8 KB PNG
>>
>>
>>42252512
It amazes me how one managed to notice this one
This one >>42248301 looks like it was man-made
>>
File: Giantaxe.png (266.1 KB)
266.1 KB PNG
Don't forget the giant trees that God commanded angels to chop down so that the nephilim could not escape the flood.
>>
>>
File: 301-Devils-Tower.jpg (816.5 KB)
816.5 KB JPG
>>42253001
Yeah, giant petrified trees are everywhere and still live in the form of redwood trees.
>>
>>
For those who wonder what these giant creatures are, check the article of Robert Monroe Far Journeys - The Mystery of Loosh.
Basically, the demiurge created creatures in order to extract Loosh from them. Some kind of food for him and other cosmic entities. The aim was to create cultivated Loosh, in a garden, earth, as opposed to it's natural form.
First generation was bacterias, stuff like that. Second generation, vegetation, including giant trees that we see cut today on earth. Third generation was Titans, supposed to eath the giant plants. Fourth generation was animals as we know today, smaller than the Titans, and gendered. Human was created using a small part of the demiurge himself, and generated a considerable amount of Loosh. I think that it is where the myth of Saturn comes from. Saturn who eats his own children.
>>
>>
File: Brain Planets.jpg (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB JPG
>>
>>
Pareidolia - the thread. I really can't fathom why that is so hard for you retards to understand. Those shapes were there a hundred million years before anyone even had that shape. Your brain is extremely sensitive to human shapes, to the point of error. Want proof?
:) <-BEHOLD! WHAT ARE THEY NOT TELLING US? WAKE UP SHEEPLE!
>>
File: Deboonker.jpg (100.4 KB)
100.4 KB JPG
>>42256846
Why are you even on this board? Do you work for snopes or something?
>>
>>
>>
>>42258468
I hate to say it but he's right, you idiots are exhibiting classic seeing-faces-where-they-don't-existpareidolia. Try to think for the first time in your life. If any of those stone structures were actually petrified body parts of giants, they would be skeletal, just bones, after all the flesh rotted off, and not still fleshed out like they were hit with a Dr. Stone petrification ray. You fucking moron.
>>
File: O'Shaughnessy Whale Brain.jpg (127.9 KB)
127.9 KB JPG
>>42258478
>If any of those stone structures were actually petrified body parts of giants, they would be skeletal, just bones
This is incorrect and I don't fault you since the mechanisms of soft tissue petrification are mostly ignorded by popular science. Here are some references you can puruse in case you aren't just a grifter, but are willing to expand your bubble of knowledge.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S003707380400194 0
https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/local/article39192456.html
https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-abstract/44/11/95 1/195125/Exceptional-preservation-o f-soft-bodied-Ediacara
>>
>>
>>42258655
Exceptionally rare even in lagerstatten and requires the body to be buried, which I suppose is why this nonsense often goes hand in hand with mudflood gibberish. Also essentially always mono-mineral replacement (pyrite, silica, calcite, etc.) whereas if you look at these things in situ, they're rock, mixes of things, often igneous, with identifiable geological structures usually contiguous with the surrounding area. (eg "tree stumps" with horizontal layering matching the adjacent bedrock for hundreds of miles around)
To date, outside of a few cast like the whale brain pictureds, no soft body fossils bigger than a bug have been found displaying anything like the level of preservation being attributed to these obvious landforms, not even the so-called dinosaur mummies.
And wood does not count as soft tissue.
>>
>>42258769
So, the examples of this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y26jwg4fAxQ as well as those shown in this thread are purely coincidental and despite the number of samples with more than one anatomical correlation with actual animal hearts- localized in a specific part of Spain- is a simple case of pareidolia?
>>
File: 1000015195.jpg (73.7 KB)
73.7 KB JPG
>>42242058
It gets quiet when you get close to the older formations.
People where I'm from don’t call them mountains at first. They say they are “holds.” Things that never finished changing.
Devils Tower is one of the obvious ones. Looks like something was standing there and just… didn’t finish leaving.
The ground around it has that compressed look, like the pressure got released very unevenly.
And beyond the shown mapped edge of our playground, where the ice line is said to begin, directions get unreliable. Not blocked, just inconsistent, like the surface layer stops agreeing with itself.
No one agrees on what caused it. Only that the shapes are still there.
>>
>>42258863
Oh joy, another video.
Wedge/chevrons are extremely common in nature, whether due to spalling, ablation or other processes. He even admits he's applying selection bias.
I don't know what type of rock he's collecting (limestone? dolomite?) but certain kinds are susceptible to certain features and you're going to find them over and over again, thus the odds of finding specimens exhibiting one or more becomes considerably lower. There's a good chance the holes are actually contributing to the shape. The fact that there's only the vaguest of similarities with no real unity of t of features is telling.
His argument from around 21:40 is extremely disingenuous bordering on self-delusional. Has it never occurred to him that erosion is an ongoing process?
Real curious to know what a professional anatomist has to say about this.