>>1016642
You are the retarded one for using xitter

>>1016642
It might as well be AI slop in this case

Everyone who flips out on ai, i know can be tricked by ai. There are legitimate criticisms but nearly all the critics are irrationally lashing out.

File: the millennial brain.webm (722.4 KB)

722.4 KB WEBM

>>1016642
I'd rather label every shitty video as AI instead of being a dumbfuck millennial trying to push retarded "AI pipelines" into the workplace with horrible fucking results

>>1016652
>if its shitty its ai no matter what

im glad retards like you look and sound like genuine retards. so much so normies just ignore you

something like this happened to me but in reverse
I got some of those weird cutting random things videos and at first i thought they were cool rendered animations but like a couple days i found that they were ai kek

>>1016642
Reminder that gen alpha are now 15 years old. Zoomers are now the young adults that are struggling to find jobs and not die of starvation in terrible economy. Gen alpha are now the dumb teens populating the internet.

Also for meme videos you are far more likely to see AI instead of CGI, and AI videos are really good these days unless you have been living under the rock for the past 4 months. Just admit CGI is a walking corpse that will soon be dead and enjoy the lasting fame from anti-AI zoomers, because these zoomers will be your last audience.

>>1017199
>really good
At fooling retards, yes. It's still greasy trash that's nauseating to look at.

>>1016652
he's right. Spielberg invented modern cinematography

>>1016652
happy good ai is slowly taking over and retards like you cant tell the difference because its all pixel on a screen

>xitters
>zoomers
it's aging millennials.
as an aging millennial i can tell you that my fellow aging millennials have started using ai and cg interchangeably when talking about vfx in film

>>1016652
Source for this? I want to ruin his podcast career and tell all 7 of his patreons to unsub

>>1016652
>filename
But most of us really like Ghostbusters. Also a HUGE swath loves Back to the Future and Indiana Jones. Who the fuck is this faggot?

>>1019761
Nah

File: 1762989752665785.jpg (305.1 KB)

305.1 KB JPG

people lose their minds over it because it does what they do better and faster than they can - ripping off or merging existing styles.
A true artist breaks ground and makes something that not even be capable for an Ai to image.
dariusz zawadzki the painter. Ai would have no idea what this style should look like had he never invented it. But there's all kinds of models and loras trained to rip off his style.
So why is it that his paintings still regularly go for tens of thousands in USD at auction?
you could argue he's ripping of HR Giger but thats a different conversation.
people value paint on canvas more than a digital image the same way they value a tattoo on their body more than the same image printed on a piece of paper.
it's about the status of owning something that took a skilled craftsman a lot of time to make.
extend this even to swiss watches vs their chinese replicas that are identical unless you're an inch away from them. one sells for 60x the price of the other, on the low end, and both are beat out in reliability by a $10 casio.
So it's a little confusing without understanding people's deeper motivations towards status and how much they are willing to spend on it. Which this whole Ai issue is about people being worried about their money at the core of it. maybe I'm overly optimistic, but Ai at this stage makes it easier than ever to make money for yourself