>>1024137
60k just for the hair

>>1024145
No. Most of it is the face.

File: Capture.jpg (191.1 KB)

191.1 KB JPG

>>1024146
& tits actually.

Same shit as the old 2b butt thing where you subdivided bits of the ripped model for fake outrage huh

>>1024149
it's ripped directly from UE you fucking chud. go check it yourself on openlab.

File: Capture.jpg (149.7 KB)

149.7 KB JPG

Now THIS is retopo. crisp and clean ~27k.

>>1024147
SOVL
>>1024151
SOVLESS

>>1024137
>>1024137
Stop complaining about +1 (or minus 5) percent fidelity gains, just run the game @ 240p and turn on DLSS chud.

>>1024137
my daz models have 150-300k easily. pretty standard, tf u yapping about

>>1024161
I can imagine a retard saying this unironically lol

>>1024151
>>1024159
Turn on subsurface division

>>1024137
Masturbation is a disease.

>>1024147
There is so many useless vertices on the forehead...

>>1024353
Retard chud, the geometry wouldn't be smooth then

>>1024137
what game is this and how does ue handle lod?

if I remember right older tessellation would have a very high res version if you are close and you could get details to spawn in and map to it, effectively a very scalable level of detail slider without set hard asset replacements. see

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjoFykQSZN0

around the minute and a half mark, this style never really made it to games, in games it was mostly ever used to smooth faces and barely got used

I know unreal streams a fuckload of its assets instead of loading them in, so what if this is just a single model acting as every level of lod at once the detail just streaming in as needed?

File: 1.jpg (205.8 KB)

205.8 KB JPG

>>1024137
>>1024147
the cutscene models in that game are extremely high quality. the in game ones are different.

>>1024137
what kinda goon slop will you make with it?

>>1024137
Where did you steal this model from?

File: M1-Win64-Shipping_9E8l4fZLzq.jpg (67.8 KB)

67.8 KB JPG

>>1024405
It's The First Descendant and what this anon said is correct: >>1024426

I'm guessing OP is looking at the high-detail model of Viessa from the character select screen. Pic related is her regular model.

>>1024470
makes alot of sense, if you get close to a face or boobs, the more detailed they are the better.

like if an entire screen is taken up with a face, you want that face to be fucking amazing,

or in the case of fighting games, when its 2 characters on screen at a time and you have a 4+ million polly budget, put 100k in the back and give the characters 1.95m poly budgets to work with.

>>1024137
This is exactly what they should be doing and complaining about it just shows you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to modern character art in games. You want more topology in areas like the face so you can have facial animations that actually deform without breaking the shading and making it looks choppy and like shit. I don't ever wanna see xbox 360 ass low poly faces ever again because they look like shit. I wanna see high res faces that have good silhouetting and lighting interaction. I want high poly titties that look good and make me cum. You are stupid and will never get close to making AAA titties for any studio with this attitude.

>>1024137
It's to make sure the shading is not terrible, I think.

File: Capture.jpg (267.1 KB)

267.1 KB JPG

>>1024137
It's a UE thing. Here's the guy from lost soul aside

>>1024758
do you even need flow when you have that many polys in the face? can a sculpt deform well?

>>1024772
That is low poly for a sculpt, and it wouldn't deform well with a remesh topology

>>1024773
why not? it's so dense at that point why would it matter.

>>1024774
Try it yourself, it creates all sorts of artefacts

>>1024772
Are you that guy who normally prattles on about vertex density being more important than edgeflow? Why are you allergic to good edgeflow. It's not even that hard to retopo. Or even just box model. If you have a good base mesh, then why sculpt with messy vertices. Just pull up your base mesh, and sculpt that.

>>1024779
CHUDDY CHUDDY CHUD

I wanna ask if 4 mln polys good or meh for concept art sculpting?

>>1024819
It depends

>>1024819
Are you retarded?

>>1024822
Fair. Character concept art, then.
>>1024823
It depends

PS Oh yeah, I meant 40 millions. I guess I am retarded tonight.

>>1024825
Depending on the style it can be enough to express what you want to show, but it could be on the lower side for highly detailed
If it's concept art then the polycount doesn't matter