Thread #5094225 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: austrian-cow-shows-fir-4.jpg (326.4 KB)
326.4 KB JPG
COWS DEMONSTRATE FLEXIBLE MULTI-PURPOSE TOOL USE
Cows are now UNDENIABLY far more intelligent than cats and 99% of mammals. If you think it's wrong to eat cats, then you must feel the same way about cows and pigs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGVo41MuLiQ
“The only well-documented case of something comparable comes from chimpanzees, on those – also rare – occasions when they fish for termites by combining the functions of the two opposite ends of the same stick,” Osuna-Mascaró told BBC Science Focus.
https://www.sciencefocus.com/news/cow-tool-use
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/first-ever-flexible-tool-us e-seen-in-a-cow-suggests-livestock- are-smarter/
70 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
File: DingoTakingOutTheTrash.jpg (72.7 KB)
72.7 KB JPG
>>5094228
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: xuhkk6h1rfeg1.jpg (112.6 KB)
112.6 KB JPG
>>5094241
No one else on this entire board is exclusively obsessed with seething about cats besides you, brownoid faggot.
>>
>>
>>5094249
you could have said "it's wrong to eat dogs" in your OP (which would make more sense because there are regions on the planet that still eat dog) but you didn't, you decided to seethe about cats instead. so you exposed yourself again rajesh.
man it feels good to live in a developed western country posting from a desktop computer vs. (You) living from a dingy favela posting from a $50 jeetdroid. it feels good knowing i'll live well into my 80s whereas you'll be dead before 50.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1744619887129494.png (24.5 KB)
24.5 KB PNG
>>5094270
>>
>>5094225
Using intelligence (something you dont understand) as a proxy for value is an absurd godless religion and refuted in every way by every other arbitrary set of values that results in greater evolutionary fitness as a matter of fact. You have no metaphysics and can not die right. You can only die weak and conquered or successful and well known. The best you can hope for is being an r selected slave caste dependent society because disregarding meat makes it impossible for most of the population, other than the elite, to grow fully developed brains and bodies. It does not matter how right you think you are because such a society is made slaves to a better one and going forward either devolves into animals and eventually goes extinct (ape species are short lived) or evolves into meat eating humans again.
If you have metaphysics you can be disregarded anyways because they’re not real.
>>
>>
>>5094256
Nah. Dogs evolved to and were selected further for triggering human empathy instincts. If you eat dogs you are a dysgenic servitor creature only fit to follow orders and expire for the benefit of your superiors, lest you be a parasite incapable of playing by the rules of advanced society. Dog eaters are universally associated with garbage conditions and inferior nations. Even the chinese loathe dog eating peasants and are actively working towards a future without them. Livestock on the other hand were bred to be just contemptible enough to be edible to people with the optimal balance between in group and out group preference.
>>
>>
File: IMG_3423.png (77.3 KB)
77.3 KB PNG
>>5094225
>>
>>
>>5094225
Anyone who works with cows knew this already. There are 2 kinds of people who eat meat, those who feel justified to kill and eat cows despite them being every bit as personable as a dog, and those who are in denial and imagine them as some kind of lesser mammal that feels less.
>>
>>5094350
They might be personable but they're hard to feel bad for. Dogs (at least proper dogs, not golden retriever tier tards) will not tolerate slaughter or farm conditions because they have superior willpower and self awareness (predators have bigger souls than prey). Cows won't care much. But one cow can still feed a family for a year and produce a hundred pounds of useful byproducts, and killing them is still a big deal. They're not a staple product. They're a huge investment too.
Now, chickens, most people should eat chicken. They are genuinely worthless animals somewhat below a cat. Basically tastier vermin. They can look cute for youtube but in real life they are horrid reptilian automatons that exist solely so ensouled mammals can have something to eat. Bonus: Eggs.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: troll-troll-ception.gif (250 KB)
250 KB GIF
>>5094374
Because nobody is replying to schizo poster, this tread consist in like 80% schizo poster replying to himself to fake a discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>5094225
>Cows are now UNDENIABLY far more intelligent than cats and 99% of mammals
Okay?
>If you think it's wrong to eat cats
I don't
If you thought animal intelligence was the limiting factor in deciding what we eat, youre dumber the tool using cow. Animals are made of food, and a cow scratching its back doesn't change that
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: crowsunglasses.jpg (196.5 KB)
196.5 KB JPG
>>5094225
newsflash, crows are smarter and 100x more adorable than any smelly retarded bovine that should be slaughtered up and packaged as ground beef
>>
File: qfaith5uh9w81.jpg (34.3 KB)
34.3 KB JPG
>>5095696
vegans are performative narcissists in the fedora tipper category. first and foremost they want other people to think they are enlightened, advanced, progressive, and thoughtful, and of course, they want to be better than people who are not.
therefore the foundational concern that gives rise to their entire value system is intelligence.
vegans will go as far as constructing laughable illogical studies to claim that they are smarter *because* they are vegan... when really, it's just that only wealthier people and therefore smarter people are likely to have the opportunity to be a vegan without ending up in the hospital, or have access to paths of indoctrination into the pseudo-religious ideals upon which their beliefs ultimately find purchase for that matter. i have often seen vegans even claim they are nicer people, based on their own self reported personality characteristics. but every vegan i have known has been a nasty asshole and a telescope philantropist. self reported indeed.
>>
>>
>>5094225
Doesn't matter, cows or any animal can never be moral agents or represent themselves. I can eat a thousand, not one will come knocking on my door.
>muh fetus and insane patients
they have the potential to be moral agents and represent themselves, babies by growth and insane patients through medical tech. it will be at least a million years before any animal alive today reaches the moral capability of a human
>so braindead patients can be eaten?
no, because of disease, retard
>why don't you eat cats and dogs
carnivores taste like shit thanks to stringy musculature and their diets giving unpleasant tastes to meat. even omnivores like pigs require castration and special diets to taste good.
>what about pet chickens
I have eaten my own pet chickens after they stopped laying eggs. problem?
>>
>>5097669
We selectively bred cats and dogs to force your ape brain to turn on its empathy circuits. If someone casually eat sthem, they are a problem. We have plenty of ugly as fuck pitiable/disgusting animals for people to eat like pitbulls, cows, and OPs mother.
>>
File: tasty animal flesh.jpg (198.8 KB)
198.8 KB JPG
>>5094225
If your worldview doesn't let you eat steak, burgers, and bacon, you're a faggot.
>If you think it's wrong to eat cats
I don't, but why would I eat a cat when capitalism doesn't put people into such desperate levels of starvation to resort to such sub-optimal sources of food? You wouldn't even have the option of a vegan diet if it weren't for meat-eating capitalists. Why do you think they eat dog in China? It's not some "equally valid cultural thing" it's because they don't have the abundance of food.
>but they're ... le smart
If animals are smart to you, then I've got a bridge to sell you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1748370541155467.jpg (38.5 KB)
38.5 KB JPG
>>5094228
>>
File: 1722012958224053.jpg (155.9 KB)
155.9 KB JPG
>>5094388
Ok I'kwibalalatach.