Thread #5098144 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
HomeIndexCatalogAll ThreadsNew ThreadReply
H
Do you guys think it's weird or unethical to taxidermize your pets after they die?
+Showing all 20 replies.
>>
Weird, yes.
Unethical, no.
It's unethical to taxidermy your pets before they die.
>>
>>5098145
>It's unethical to taxidermy your pets before they die.
true.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvexNH-bt8g
>>
>>5098144
It's weird because in a year you won't even care any more.
>>
Its very weird. Would you stuff your dead friend or family member?
>>
>>5098144
>dog/cat
Yes
>bird/reptile
Maybe
>insect
No
>>
cat quad copter
>>
>>5098144
>Do you guys think it's weird or unethical to taxidermize your pets after they die?
Apparently it is both.
>>
I find extremely weird, one of the few things people do that actually bothers me.
>>
would just indicate an immature relation to the concept of death to me
like if you cant let go of a cat how the fuck are you going to deal with old age
>>
>>5098144
It's extremely weird and undignified. Only retarded people and psychos do this shit.
>>
>>5098144
I'd only consider doing it if they unfortunately passed away before getting old so I'm not constantly reminded of an old frail pet that slowly withered away.
>>
>>5098161
It it that different from making effigies or doing a lenin and preserving his body for commies to see? My little taxi-furbaby is like my little pocket lenin.
>>
>>5098144
You could make a statue of them that is well painted for less while seeming less creepy as well as more impressive. Fur/flesh is easy to do in terms of model acrylic painting and more than a dozen people could do it for you on the cheap.
>>
>>5098693
>>5098605
IDK seems like depending on culture. didnt polynesians shink the heads of thier parents or something?
Its still just an icon of someones memorry. Guess it hits us in our anti-idols cultural taboo.
>>
>>5098696
>IDK seems like depending on culture. didnt polynesians shink th
Well yeah and aztecs sacrificed their children, I don't really see how that is compareble to stuffing an animal
>>
>>5098699
cause they use part of the actual think as an effigy of the think.

Pretty sure having a lock of a loved one's hair was considered socially acceptable during the Napoleonic period, but now its considered weird.
>>
>>5098144
Weird. It isn't them. They are gone. No idea why you would do this.
>>
>>5098161
Ironically this is exactly what they did to the saints back the day.
Then there's mummies even further back.

These aren't customs now but they once were.
>>
>>5098151
The right animal comes this is much extended
>>
>>5098696
Cultures can be retarded too.

Reply to Thread #5098144


Supported: JPG, PNG, GIF, WebP, WebM, MP4, MP3 (max 4MB)