Thread #61785746 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: IMG_2009.jpg (569.3 KB)
569.3 KB JPG
The future scares me.
132 RepliesView Thread
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: FHgecJJWQAMVlfN.png (120.5 KB)
120.5 KB PNG
>>61785811
Why does no one ever talk about this? We're not even gonna be able to eat ze bugs.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
I don't care about wealth inequality
I don't care about the 99%
I unironically believe in the pareto principle
I unironically believe ayn rand got it right about the masses
All they do is complain
They were gifted being part of the 10% just by winning the genetic lottery of being born in a first world country and they use this privilege to complain about the 1%
They eat out every day and get food delivered to their house at double the price, even tip the waiter and then complain about the cost of living
They make under 60k yet go on vacations 3x a year to shithole countries like thailand, mexico, etc. and then complain that the $79 coach seat didn't have enough leg room, and then blame capitalism and the greedy airline company (even though the airline is LOSING money on the seat)
They take everything for granted. Nothing is ever enough. 100 years ago it wasn't uncommon to never leave your country, now people go on international trips every year and claim you're uncultured if you don't travel. 25 years ago going to the movies was a night out, now people complain if their porn isn't in 4k. 10 years ago getting a package took weeks, now people expect overnight delivery and spaz out if it takes more than 2 days.
It doesn't matter what you give them. They'll find a way to hate you. They'll find a way to destroy you. You could discover the cure to cancer and they would call you a murdering piece of shit because you aren't giving it away for free. You could build a robot that harvests crops 10x faster than a human and they would protest outside your front door for stealing immigrants' jobs. You could save 100,000 lives and they would say you are selfish because you could have saved 1,000,000.
>>
>>
>>
>>61785959
Peasant revolts never lead to any change lmao. The elite just recycled old institutions into new ones. You have to be a 100 iq retard not to see this. If this was true, we would not have people wanting to go back to the middle ages because of the assumption that there was no waging back then, that we have it worse than medieval serfs.
>>
>>
>>61785949
Ditto.
I grow more disgusted by the general population everyday. No wonder the rich are building a fence between them and the general public by living in gated community and condos with security on the first floor. They will be dumb and violent no matter what you give them so just seperate yourself from them.
>>
>>61785811
this guy knows
also
all arable land in use since about 1990 is completely burned, and the only reason it still yields is due to the humongous amount of fertilizer that is used on it every year
fertilizer is mostly produced using the haber bosch process which requires gigantic amounts of natural gas
if you stopped using haber bosch tomorrow, 4 billion people starve before end 2027
guess what are our governments doing about that?
they're making it harder and harder to produce and use fertilizer because muh global warming, and they're in general trying to minimize the amount of energy we produce as a society
good luck making fertilizer with solar panels and wind turbines
I hope you own a nice piece of land far away from the city, you know how to work it, and you treat it well (manure only). If you only knew how bad things really are. Enjoy whatever we have left for how long we have it.
>>
File: moneymagic.jpg (192 KB)
192 KB JPG
>>61785949
the problem is not wealth inequality, which is completely natural
the problem is the quality of who's at the top
the scariest part of the epstein limited hangout is not that they fuck children
is that the emails show they're just a bunch of retarded inbred arrested development manchildren who happened to be born in the right place
if you read through that stuff, do you get the impression that you're reading the correspondence between fine minds and enlightened leaders that will carry mankind to the next stage?
Or that you're reading the chat messages between horny affluent teenagers?
That is the scariest thing about the epstein files. We're in the iron grip of a bunch of retarded teenagers
>>
File: 613500558_846341551726882_6669630043857544923_n.jpg (42.8 KB)
42.8 KB JPG
>>61786071
>We're in the iron grip of a bunch of retarded teenagers
>>
>>61786071
When were we ever not led by retards? Your problem is thinking that any leader, ideology or political institution can save you and not the establishment that makes sure he gets to power. There is no big solution that will solve all our problems, this is the most difficult mindset you have to get rid off to understand how the world works and to focus your energy on something else. Otherwise you will always be disappointed because your expectation never seem to match reality.
>>
File: 1689570240550724.png (696.5 KB)
696.5 KB PNG
>>61785968
> Peasant revolts never lead to any change lmao
Not if you define "change" as "some new rich dude steps in and declares revolution" or some shit. Which by the way is the gist of the French revolution.
During the middle ages (the jew calls them the "dark" ages, because they weren't in charge lol) the balance between peasants and nobility was carefully kept stable, thanks to a bunch of factors. Religion and the church was probably the most important, institutionally. A medieval serf labored very little, owned his property (was just bound to the land) and at technological progress parity enjoyed soooo much more affluence than a modern day wagie.
Why was that?
Revolts as in peasants walking up to the castle and throwing the monarch/landlord out of the window were relatively rare (but they happened). But the threat of that potentially happening was more than enough for the monarch to walk on tiptoes. You don't go all in on fucking Annie with flash ignite and ult up - it's high risk and low reward, for both of you, you don't want that, Annie doesn't want that, so you both quietly farm mid until something else happens.
Nobody wanted revolts - neither peasants nor nobility - so that ensured stability long term. Until propaganda enters the stage, but that's a story for another time.
>>
File: tedwasright.png (2.3 MB)
2.3 MB PNG
>>61786083
> When were we ever not led by retards?
Never. But "old" retards did not have as much control on the masses as "new" retards do. People were so much more free back in middle ages than they are today. Government was mostly for show, communities self governed themselves - akin to anarchy really. A 10% tax (decima) was considered outrageously high.
The problem we have today is that people have been cattlefied by the industrial revolution. The man of today is really the shadow of the man it used to be. Read uncle Ted for more details.
>>
>>61786101
>A medieval serf labored very little, owned his property (was just bound to the land) and at technological progress parity enjoyed soooo much more affluence than a modern day wagie
They also died much younger from basic diseases. So there's no significant reduction to suffering. That's what i mean by change. Modern day wagie has no time but has a longer mortality rate, peasants had plenty of free time but suffered in other ways like lack of freedom and proclivity to diseases. The reduction of suffering you are looking for always has a cost. You have to give up a fundamental part of humanity or society to get it.
>>
>>
>>61786109
> *at technological progress parity*
please improve your reading comprehension
> peasants had plenty of free time but suffered in other ways like lack of freedom and proclivity to diseases.
peasants were orders of magnitudes more free than modern wagies
diseases are less bad because of the improvement in technologies, which raised all boats, not because the relative condition of the wagie has improved
> The reduction of suffering you are looking for always has a cost. You have to give up a fundamental part of humanity or society to get it.
You know who spends their life fleeing from suffering and discomfort? Cattle.
>>
>>
>>
>>61786126
> Yes I own my own land
try not paying property taxes and see what happens
> and can curse whomever i want
next time you're at work throw a roman salute and say "fuck jews, hail hitler" and see what happens
>>
>>
>>61786134
Taxes have always existed as long as governments have existed, since the days of mesopotamia so this isn't really an argument. And me having freedom to curse anyone does not mean I have to conform to your standards, like i said i have the freedom to cruse whomever I LIKE, not who you want.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>61785949
>i put these mice in a maze and shocked them whenever they tried to escape and now they've adjusted to their helplessness and simply 'exist' - I HATE THEM SO MUCH! WHY DON'T THEY KEEP TRYING TO ESCAPE???
you're a dumb nigger and it's scientific
>>
File: but you knew i was a scorpion when you let me in.jpg (285.4 KB)
285.4 KB JPG
>>61785746
>commits greatest crime in human history
>>
>>61786174
you're not free you've just given justification for your own situation and provided defense for those that insist on taxation at these levels.
You pay property tax, estate tax, income tax, sales tax, value added tax, duties, tariffs, eco taxes, capital gains tax.
You don't own anything, you can't defend anything that you own anymore. The government has complete control of your life, and you pretend it's okay by PRETENDING it was always like this.
It was NEVER this bad.
You are VASTLY less free than most people of history. Your taxes are VASTLY more oppressive than was ever even thought possible to be implemented.
Your current mindset is understandable, because we've all been boiled like frogs, but we need to wake up.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1769024755254196.jpg (412 KB)
412 KB JPG
>>61786120
fucking truth nuke
>>
>>
>>
>>61785746
taxation in the US is completely fucked.
lower and lower middle classes pay basically nothing in fed income tax -- this is 35-40% of all US households who pay $0 fed income tax.
middle to upper middle class (people who work for a living) get obliterated with federal income tax. they have no avenues to legally avoid taxes because they're W2 or 1099 wagies. many of them will never exceed the standard deduction, and it's very possible that their income is "prohibitively" high to the extent that it phases out tax credit gibs available to lower and lower middle classes.
then you have the upper class that can subside on capital gains (preferential tax treatment) and maybe even play the securities backed line of credit game (even better tax treatment). if they're a business owner they might legally or "legally" avoid taxes by taking deductions not available to non-business owners, play games with salary vs distributions or keeping money in the business but loaned out to the taxpayer, etc.
it's all a scam. if you actually work for a living AND you aren't retarded (middle to upper middle class) you get fucked on all sides: high taxes, no access to non-tax gibs (subsidized water/sewer/electricity, section 8, free internet for school age kids, free school lunches, etc.), and an increasingly competitive job market as these sorts of jobs are targets for outsourcing/downsizing/shitskinification/etc.
>>
>>
File: Screenshot 2026-02-04 at 7.03.15 AM.png (945.8 KB)
945.8 KB PNG
>>61786855
>>61786752
On a meta level surveillance (AI) is used to try and socially shame people deemed "scary" or individualist through carefully crafter zersetzung via data into being redditor blob people.
>>
>>61786071
We have old out of touch retards who hate and militate against youth with an unhealthy israel obsession along with a coalition of far left high mutational load freakshows who want everyone to be as miserable as them. Future for "liberal democracy" doesn't look very bright. Both want you to be a asexual pharmaceutical wageslave.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>61786049
>all arable land in use since about 1990 is completely burned
you don't have a clue of what you're talking about
regenerative crops exist
the only difference now is that jews convinced the cattle that vegetables from those are "super foods" lol
>>
>>
>>61785949
Look at the media being pushed (by whom ?)
Look at the so-called "culture" pushed (by whom ?)
Look at the values of our leaders
>>61786071 is right. Ah, whatever. It won't stop my day to day.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>61786109
Peasants were vastly healthier than the average modern goy and even lived longer. They had less stress less debt and got to eat real nutritional food and live in cleaner healthier environments that weren't infested with micro plastics or smog or soil stripped of all nutrients
Cancer literally didn't even exist back then
>But muh life expectancy
Retard, we had ancient figures with names like Pliny the ELDER. People lived well into their 80s back then. Old people actually existed, they're not some new invention of the modern goy world
>>
>>
>>61785949
You reference the Pareto principle as if it’s some esoteric, controversial thing. It’s pretty well established fact.
Masses are cattle yes, but a lot of your gripes with them here are just bitching. People just want to talk about stuff and the leg room on the airplane gives them a conversation starter.
>>
>>
>>
>>61785949
Did you know that you don't need to create an entirely new line for every sentence you write? How can you expect anyone to take your anecdotal evidence and believe that you are presenting it in good faith if you can't be bothered to follow the basic rules of written communication?
>>
File: 1b21306ff34b097f.jpg (92.4 KB)
92.4 KB JPG
>>61785791
Because it is default human psychology.
Just think of yourself. Imagine you had an excess of something, lets call it X. You have so much X you don't even know what to do with all that X. And then you meet someone who is suffering, because he doesn't have X.
You'd give him a little X. Why not? You have more than you will ever need. It makes you feel good. You're a good guy like that.
>>
>>
>>61785968
yes old institutions get recycled
but the key part here is that a lot of the elite get 'recycled' with it too, only the international mobile elite comes out on top
and in our current setup anyone that owns his own house is going to be the collectivized kulak
and yes excluding tech developments, socially we have it way worse than medieval serfs
they were certain of their food clothing and shelter
you have to go in debt for them
waging was an invention post industrial revolution, the level of continuous current uncertainty if you even have your monthly stipend to get food didnt exist for the past excluding catastrophies
>>
>>
File: Full Retard.jpg (25.1 KB)
25.1 KB JPG
>>61786120
>peasants were orders of magnitudes more free than modern wagies
No. No. No.
>relative condition
The relative condition will always be the same because 70% of you ARE cattle. You're followers and NPCs. You live in squalor because you're stupid and lazy. I'm sure you've convinced yourself that you work "hard", but I also guarantee you have a layer of dirt on your window sills and in the corners and door frames and on the back of your toilet.
You don't understand maintenance or planning for the future.
>>61786109
Modern Wagie works 8 hours a day, 5 days a week. Peasants worked 10-15 hours, six days a week. People who think otherwise live in cities or suburbs and have no idea that fighting the environment is a full time job that you don't get to take days off from, and if you had all this "Free time", you'd find your farm overrun with wilderness within a few days.
>>61786586
Your definition of free is an adolescent fantasy and your study of history is 3rd grade level at best. Frogs don't boil unless they're literally lobotomized, that's another bit of bullshit that you believe that turns out isn't true.
>>
>>
>>61788662
the problem with 'work' in its modern meaning isnt about being productive in the day or lazing about
its that modern work is being a cog to a cruel and uncaring machine that can fire you and cut you off from basic necessities on a moments notice and on top of that the amount of productivity you display in a given month does not correlate to your material rewards
meanwhile the peasant was certain that field he tended was still going to be there in a decade, he was a valuable part of his lords hold and not a 'human resource' and the more or the better the peasant worked the more material benefit he gets
its the combination of being permanently stressed out in insecurity and the total disconnect between labor effort and reward that makes modern society the hellpit it is
>>
>>
>>61785959
look up history of the word villain
>>61786788
that's why it sounds made up to me, inequality is an observation, not a problem, question whether it should or shouldn't be resolved is meaningless
>>61786964
it's easily preventable
>>61788087
this analogy doesn't work when one party has billions of dollars, and another party has to make up imaginary reasons why it's suffering because it never really felt hunger and has running hot water
>>
>>61785827
It gets even better when you learn that plants become naturally immune to pests when fed less nitrogen/potassium and more calcium. But most of the "complete" synthetic fertilizers contain little to no calcium, and lots of nitrogen/potassium.
'They' know exactly what they're doing
>>
>>61785746
why are jews so obsessed about money? It's not just money. It's other "points" systems as well. These people are absolutely on some autism spectrum about "points" and "numbers" that must "go up" no matter what. They also hate all other people who don't belong to their group. These people can't build a fucking society. They simply play their fucking points game until total destruction. They are money addicts that need to be cured by lead.
>>
>>
>>
File: 1769719964084664.png (13.5 KB)
13.5 KB PNG
>>61786071
Wealth inequality is still a problem and I think people are being too dismissive of it because they want to live in a gated community away from niggers.
A lot of the people in this thread especially simp for boomers who are so out of touch with society and wouldnt even be able to get a job in the current meta because they are too busy replacing their own homelanders for three jeets a pop because one homelander asking for minimum wage is too entitled nowadays.
Said boomers will try to extract blood from a stone no matter what cost it comes to them or their children being dismissed for employment in their own homeland just to be told theyre overqualified.
And then when no one is around to buy the luxury apartments that boomers are making all over the place they will say nobody wants to work for the millionth time.
The problem with you guys is ever since you made decent money on stocks and crypto you slowly stopped convincing yourself its a rigged game. Stocks are heavily manipulated to extract wealth upwards. Its no different to fractional reserve banking. They need a pyramid to justify their scheme.
>>
>>
>>
>>61785791
>>61785959
Post-war systems of control hinge on material comfort and security for most, I don't consider OP to be a fait accompli.
A technological society and economy necessarily requires a supermajority middle class, since the bulk of innovation and wealth creation comes from here, much of it entirely emergent. A parasitic/cannibalistic financial system has screwed that pooch for not reason other than pure avarice and short-sighted thinking, psychopathic behaviour.
Education has expanded while entrepreneurialism has declined (cargo culting a real tech company for money is not entrepreneurialism), the idea being to funnel more talent where it belongs. Problem is, most talent ends up at the richest companies who pay them to not work for a competiton, which is a dead end.
They say that help is the nice side of control and, to a large extent, elites have relied on it heavily for a century (or two, in the USA) to best control and profit off the population. I don't believe the current elite knows the first thing about authoritarian rule because they're very, very bad at it. Most of the above only applies to boomers, these days, half of millenials are off the reservation and younger generations are a complete X factor.
>>
>>61785791
Based
>>61785746
This is typical buttmad behavior. You're not mad you have less, you're mad other people have more because you somehow think you're entitled to more.
You would willingly choose to give up 10% of your income to make the richest 1% lose 40% of theirs.
>The average person owns no wealth
Well, barely any. But that's how its always been. Since preindustrial times, since feudal times and before. This is not a new thing. What is new is that the standard of living of the average person is tremendously higher than it was 50, 100, 300 years ago, but more importantly this generation has been raised with such spoiled boomer parents shit that a bunch of tards think they're all entitled to a standard of living perhaps 10% of Ameircans actually enjoy today and less than 1% of the world or anyone historically has ever experienced.
>>
>>
>>61790408
>Pirate PDF of "A Generation of Sociopaths: How the Baby Boomers Betrayed America"
>Notice author name
>PayPal Mafia Good Goy
>Read introduction
>Lays everything on individual boomer choices while positing that there is something unique about this generation
>Immediately dismisses the idea of top-down influence playing a factor (incl. government, finance, media, etc)
>Specifically dismisses the idea of a "cabal" pulling the strings as a crazy conspiracy theory (can't remember if he explicitly calls it antisemetic)
>"Every boomer is a selfish sociopath who telepathically subconsciously decided to all make the same decisions without any singular influences or factors affecting them"
Boomers are old retarded children but it's ridiculous to expect that human nature wasn't at play and that other generations in the same time and place wouldn't have done the exact same thing.
It was by design, we know who is to blame, and they're trying to dirty the water and spread the blame around
>>
>>
>>61790629
>You would willingly choose to give up 10% of your income to make the richest 1% lose 40% of theirs.
But that's not the choice.
The choice is "would you like to double or quadruple your income by simply getting rid of a certain group of people?"
>>
>>61790629
>1000 people pool 10 beans each
>10,000 beans
>1 person is now required to cough up 4,000,000 beans
>4,010,000 beans to serve collective needs of 1001 people
>"kek, a thousand idiots amirite?"
All the best shit happened during periods of mass subsidisation, it just happened via cheap credit at the expense of other nations and future generations, forcing long term austerity on one part of the empire in order to prop up the other.
Taxing the super-rich is fun, smart, and easy. What's even more fun, smart, and easy is determining which gains are ill gotten, it's far more efficient to seize. Who knows, the remaining respectable businessmen might not suffer extra taxation at all, when it's through.
>>
>>61786071
This nigger read a wall of text meticulously explaining how entitled he and his ilk really and his own rebuttal was that the people at the top haven't made him a god yet. I hate poorniggers so fucking much.
>>
File: 1761881863593820.jpg (58.5 KB)
58.5 KB JPG
>>61786049
>4 billion people starve before end 2027
This'll be fine. Overpopulation is correcting hard in any place where people make more than a couple dollars a day.
Basically, I'll move to switzerland and we'll continue to block the mountain passes and no darkies will be able to move in and ruin everything. Flak cannons for when they try to parachute in.
>>
>>
>>61790672
>Boomers are old retarded children but it's ridiculous to expect that human nature wasn't at play and that other generations in the same time and place wouldn't have done the exact same thing.
Im not saying human nature isnt a factor, just that plutocracy doesnt select for positive traits. And if I was in their place history would undoubtedly be different.
No matter how left or right I was at any given time I always believed that we should let this system collapse and go back to old fashioned bartering. I fix your AC and you give me a few dozen eggs. Our boomers couldnt survive if society demanded the trade and market skills we have but from them instead. Let them figure out how to fix their car or electric when shit goes south.
>>
>>
>>
>>61791664
fantasy:
>I have marketable skills, I fix your AC and you give me a few dozen eggs
reality:
>my a/c works fine and I don't need any assistance right now, and our village already has one handyman who can do everything, but we have horse cocks that need washing if you're hungry and want some gruel, sorry man, we couldn't score enough fertilizers and had a bad harvest and can't afford to pay more to an outsider
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: bizbizbiz.jpg (110.6 KB)
110.6 KB JPG
>>61785823
>>61785773
>>
>>
>>
There is literally no reason to make money other than to use it to secure the existence of yourself and people like you.
I'm genuinely amazed so many crypto millionaires exist and wonder how many were quietly killed off before they could fund genuine alternatives to the current beast system.
>>
>>
>>61786101
> A medieval serf labored very little
yea they had some advantages but this is just a blatant lie. the "days off" you were working your own land instead of your lords, the festivals and holidays might mean half a day off or eating meat instead of gruel.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>61785949
You are in the wrong for locking yourself in a cage with a lion despite raising it as a cub. You talk about the “masses” but the “masses” only follow their biological imperative. Billions of people behave the same way because we are biologically driven to behave in a certain way. You can argue whatever you want about how the 10% are the “exceptional”, but you are in the wrong, and the masses are in the right. Even if that means they would still be living in caves and eating bugs. There is an unspoken social contract between these “animal” people and the “exceptional”, and if you don’t give them what they want (the minimum to fulfill their biological imperatives) they will kill you and have every right to do so.
You are the stranger, not them.
>>
>>
File: 1746461458167693.png (334.1 KB)
334.1 KB PNG
>>61785791
>You and your neighbors have 1 piece of bread to split amongst eachother
>One guy in town owns 999 pieces of bread, and keeps telling you that your neighbors are the reason you don't have more bread
>One of your neighbors says "hey, that guy didn't bake that bread, we did, so why does he get to eat all of it?"
>Class consciousness is achieved
>You and your neighbors gang up and kill that guy and take back the bread he stole because he's a parasite
>Now everyone has 5 pieces of bread each, and they live happily ever after
spoiler: this is the future of American Capitalism. there is no alternative.
>>
>>61794491
>Now everyone has 5 pieces of bread each, and they live happily ever after
How is it that everyone came to have the same amount of bread each, where did this magical equity come from and how is it maintained? You also forgot about the part where you murder the guy with 25 pieces of bread who simply worked harder and smarter than you to earn them. He has more than you after all, why would you arbitrarily stop murdering persons with less than 999 bread?
>>
File: HAXKHw3WEAAy3fq.jpg (292.2 KB)
292.2 KB JPG
>>61785746
Bill Gates and Epstein and others discussing how to get rid of the poor people. Did the vaxx fuck up? Or does it just need more time, that is, it primarily targets fertility numbers?
>>
>>
>>
these are just incel fantasies
the actual thing that will happen is that things will get slowly more shitty but as tech develops government will provide more social services and eventually a UBI that will keep people able to be supported while the system keeps going
there is going to be no great reset or war or revolution
>>
>>
>>
File: 1431687489119.jpg (629.4 KB)
629.4 KB JPG
>>61792222
QUADS CHECKED
>>
The rich increasingly have a more compelling hold on people. They can keep people appeased and keep the power and wealth for themselves at the same time. So there will be no correction this time, unless they want it.
>>
>>
>>61785949
>You could discover the cure to cancer and they would call you a murdering piece of shit because you aren't giving it away for free.
Actually, it's far worse. People who discover the cure to cancer and give it away for free are shunned by the goyim who would much rather pay millions (of someone else's money) to be poisoned by medical jews.
>>
File: Top 10% in 2025.jpg (69 KB)
69 KB JPG
>>61785746
If you weren't part of the top 10% in 2025, you're lower class
>>
File: boomer.png (70.3 KB)
70.3 KB PNG
>uhh wealthy people bad
>wealthy people uhh getting more wealthy
>wealthy people make everyone suffer so they bad
>because they are wealthy, they are taking away from everyone else uhh
>wealth creation? Intellectual property? uhh what
>>
>>61792388
Checked
I wish it were not true but reading, in earnest, absolutely retarded leftist talking points float around here has me noticing the complete lack of anything promoting the actual making of money in lieu of even more enrichment schema for governments. I hate the modern internet so much.
The 5th column remains perniciously undefeated since athens
>>
>>61794589
They bargained for a world class designer virus to mass kill off the population. That's why the propaganda was off like a fucking rocket as soon as it hit the west. Problem was it was done with cheap chinese labor and was (possibly accidentally) released too early. I have to imagine some really, really salty davos meetings in the last few years talking about how they blew it. Now we're getting prepped for ol' reliable: world war
To be fair, we *do* need a mass culling of population. Earths resources are spread way too thin. Engineering which groups get to survive and which ones are culled is the true evil.
>>