Thread #2947917 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: robotscollage.jpg (215.7 KB)
215.7 KB JPG
Post all about /diy/ robotics, robowaifus, kits, hardware, careers, ideas, etc.
177 RepliesView Thread
Showing all 177 replies.>>
File: Galatea v3 Series.jpg (80.4 KB)
80.4 KB JPG
>>2947917
My design, the Galatea Multipurpose Companion Maid Robot
Right now, I'm working on upgrades to the leg design and a backscratcher attachment.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1759895559999635.png (307.5 KB)
307.5 KB PNG
>>2949514
Yeah. The age of robotics is here
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>2949808
Lol. Fair enough, but there are plenty of White men producing content in this area. In fact rn we dominate. Here's a fun channel to watch. There's at least a dozen others.
https://www.youtube.com/user/jamesbruton
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>2949934
Should be quite a popular feature for Trannies to cope, seethe, and dilate to? Maybe Tesla can brand it "The 41% Kit"! :D
For the rest of us, two words:
Jailbreak.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>2955371
Yeah, that's him.
It can't do anything because it doesn't exist. He has a thread up on here right now. His latest update is he twisted two short bits of wire together and put some tape over them. Elite roboticist.
>>
>>
File: checkem.jpg (73.2 KB)
73.2 KB JPG
>>2955111
Thank you! It can clean floors with the robot vacuum base, hold a UV light for sterilization, act as a security camera, help facilitate virtual childsitting, use it's speaker with local AI to talk, use it's speaker to play "live" music, be a cuddle buddy, smash poisonous spiders, scratch your back, and be an emergency light.
nice digits btw
>>2955331
>>2955358
>>2955371
>>2955433
lmao
Yeah Artbyrobot, let's see that self-improving code and robot building itself.
Surely you're not one of those boomer Christians who think anything that helps men is a sin.
>>
>>
File: Galatea 1st birthday.jpg (219 KB)
219 KB JPG
Today is actually Galatea's birthday. Here's to more years of IRL, open source, and practical robowaifus and robotics!
You can also see how she can sit at tables.
>>
>>
>>2955475
I'm currently focusing on promotion of the Galatea design and other projects
My immediately next update is to further update the AI, and maybe a homemade tablet solely for the AI.
>Head tracking? Object tracking?
Interesting idea. I'll definitely consider it if I have more independent AI hardware (like the aforementioned tablet. It did give me the idea to make the eyes blink with a short animation.
>>
>>2955489
Could you elaborate on this a bit? I understand it might be early in the process.
Are you looking to run models locally on the tablet? I would avoid that if I were you. Have a desktop PC that the tablet remotes to. Tablets can't run AI as well as PCs can, and the remoting doesn't add much complexity, as long as she can reach a router (which she probably can throughout the house).
If you do it this way, you can have a pretty immediate upgrade to STT and TTS using Whisper and whatever the best TTS is at the moment (VibeVoice? There are many and it changes from time to time).
>blinking
You could do a little wink as well. That'd be cute.
>>
File: Galatea eyes3.gif (358.7 KB)
358.7 KB GIF
>>2955544
Currently, I'm promoting Galatea all over the internet, because I want others to build her, and I think it can genuinely change the world. That's why I made full instructions for others.
>Are you looking to run models locally on the tablet? I would avoid that if I were you. Have a desktop PC that the tablet remotes to. Tablets can't run AI as well as PCs can
The AI is very open ended, with many AI software engines to use (software to run the AI model). In my manual, I detail how to run the AI on a smartphone (or tablet), or a Desktop PC. But since the speaker is a bluetooth speaker, and you need to press a microphone icon or type with the software, it's definitely much more natural and freeing to use your phone. The idea for a "homemade tablet" was so you have a dedicated device to run the AI (concept: touch screen with Raspberry Pi 5).
>and the remoting doesn't add much complexity, as long as she can reach a router (which she probably can throughout the house).
Having the audio work over Wifi is a good idea. I'll need to look into how to set that up. Another problem is needing a system for the robot to know when to listen. With my current system, the solution is to either use a STT mode that you have to activate manually, or have a STT typer, then submit the text input. With things like an Amazon Alexa, it always listens for a wake word, and disengages after sometime. Maybe I can do something like that, which would be really cool.
>You could do a little wink as well. That'd be cute.
I have a blinking gif I made recently, as well as some alternative eyes.
>>
File: IMG_20251111_093107_resized.jpg (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB JPG
Hello. I am an extreme noob at this. I work as a tech at a factory and I'm fascinated with our pallet stacker robots, so I decided to try and build my own.
Yes, those are cheap aliexpress servos. Yes, that's a RP2040. No, I will not be using external PSU's.
>>
>>
File: IMG_20251111_173710_resized.jpg (1.1 MB)
1.1 MB JPG
First ever robot is a failure. Aliexpress servos are not up to the task.
Back to the drawing board!
>>
File: PXL_20250915_010747500.jpg (1.4 MB)
1.4 MB JPG
>>2956936
>>2956845
That's very cool! If you have some money for more expensive servos may I recommend the SO-101 arm. Pic related are my arms
>>
>>
File: file.png (740 KB)
740 KB PNG
>>2949514
>>2949604
>>2954799
Want to know why they are so cheap? They are sold at a loss to collect data. These Chinese bots send data to Chinese IPs every 5 minutes. Not to mention they have multiple security vulnerabilities some reported and some not reported. Hardware sold at a loss for hundreds of thousands dollars in data siphoned back to China. That is why they are cheap.
>>
>>
File: file.png (3.4 MB)
3.4 MB PNG
>>2957307
The closest thing I know is mevita. Obviously needs work/redesign for more human aesthetic, but the hard work is done.
https://haraduka.github.io/mevita-hardware/
>>
>>
>>2957305
I well believe they are sending data back to China, but what I do not believe is that that data is worth $100,000+ per robot. If a 24/7 recording of my life was worth that much, I'd be selling them that data myself.
They're probably trying to capture the market/establish themselves as a common name, probably state backed as they see it as a fair fee to increase their chances of becoming the goto supplier. I've been at some of their product show-offs and it feels that way.
Their dogs are pretty awesome to be fair. The humanoids weren't that great, though it was an earlier version than the G1 I saw.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>2957463
Nah, if the loss is as is being suggested out, it'd be cheaper to send some MKULTRA'd mook on a holiday visa and have him go crazy with jerrycans and matches.
Think efficiency. Killer robots would be such a hopelessly inefficient way of doing it, even if it does sound like a cool scifi movie plot.
China might well just be screwing you over in a boring economy way rather than an excited death machine way. I know it's no fun.
>>
File: IMG_1383.jpg (2.5 MB)
2.5 MB JPG
Im 3d printing the new mask. I cant help but feel it might be too small by looking at it though. But as they say. Move fast and break things… sometimes… ugh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>2957353
>Estimated value: $110,000/220,000 per robot over lifetime
Environmental/Spatial Intelligence: $30,000/50,000
>High resolution 3D mapping of interior spaces
>LIDAR generated floor plans and facility layouts
>GPS tracking of robot movement and location patterns
>Identification of valuable assets, security systems, safe locations
>Industrial facility layouts
Audio Surveillance Data: $15,000/25,000
>Continuous microphone access capturing conversations
>Voice pattern recognition and speaker identification
>Business meetings, trade secrets, confidential discussions
>Household conversations revealing purchasing intent, political views
>Password/PIN mentions, security questions answers
Visual Surveillance Data: $20,000/40,000
>Camera feeds of people, documents, computer screens
>Facial recognition data for household members and visitors
>Document capture (contracts, financial statements, proprietary info)
>Behavioral pattern analysis
>Biometric data collection
Network Intelligence: $10,000/20,000
>WiFi network credentials and topology
>Connected device inventory (IoT ecosystem mapping)
>Network security posture assay
>Potential pivot point for deeper network penetration
>Corporate network architecture in business deployments
Behavioral/Demographic Data: $5,000/15,000
>Daily routine patterns and schedules
>Consumer preferences and lifestyle data
>Home occupancy patterns
>Health indicators from gait analysis
>Socioeconomic indicators from home environment
Industrial/Commercial Intelligence: $20,000/50,000
>Manufacturing processes and techniques
>Quality control procedures
>Supply chain information
>Employee productivity metrics
>Proprietary operational methods
Aggregate/AI Training Value: $10,000/20,000
>Real world robotics training data
>Human robot interaction datasets
>Physical manipulation task examples
>Navigation algorithm improvement
>Computer vision model training
>>2957463
this also
>t works in robotics: is taken from one of our internal documents
>>
>>2958993
I guess each of the values are the minimum and maximum estimated values per robot, right?
I really have trouble believing:
>Password/PIN mentions, security questions answers
That would be illegal pretty much everywhere. I don't see how you would monetise that, and even handling it is a stupid and unnecessary risk for your company. It brings all the rest of your claims into doubt.
Also, if you really value my personal data that much, why don't you just offer to buy it? Many people would take that deal right away and you could skip all of this covert stuff. You wouldn't even need to develop and sell a robot.
>this also
What do you make of this? >>2957465
Anyone who's thought about this for a little bit would see that suicide robots in homes are inefficient. I don't think you're telling the truth.
>>
>>2959003
>That would be illegal
So is putting lead in baby food and children's toys and yet every single year somebody has their kid die because China is an Anarcho capitalist country with the PR firm of a Communist one.
>>
>>
File: 1762879582352003.jpg (161.3 KB)
161.3 KB JPG
>>2959007
Who? Where did I accuse anybody here of being Chinese? Are you ESL? There unitree robots have a high value to the manufacturer that is in itself a state owned enterprise BECAUSE of the valuable sensor data being sent back to China in an unencrypted format. You can say "they can't do that, that's illegal", but they prove time and time again that they really don't give a shit about laws. Even the common sense ones like don't use lead in products meant for human contact. Why the fuck would they care about your faggy laws around data privacy?
If you are dumb enough to buy one of these chinkbots and put it in your home you deserve to have your bank account drained before it self destructs and locks you inside your burning home.
>>
>>2959011
>Where did I accuse anybody here of being Chinese?
I said he would be breaking the law, you say Chinese people don't care about breaking the law. How would that be relevant unless the implication was that he was Chinese?
I don't have anything to say on the matter other than what I already wrote here >>2957353
The privacy thing is not about laws. I know they'll happily break those. What I'm saying is:
>1. Personal data is not worth as much as is being claimed
>2. Suicide bots are ridiculous, and if this were real then >>2958993 would be posting huge state secrets for no reason
Also, saved your pic. Very nice.
>>
>>2959014
The implication that he needs to be Chinese to know that the bots are sending back data is the part where I think you're wrong. It's already known that the robots all have a security exploit that the manufacturer refused to fix.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/unitree-robot-exploit#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s &aoh=17636547212550&referrer=https% 3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=htt ps%3A%2F%2Fspectrum.ieee.org%2Funit ree-robot-exploit
An exploit that allows remote takeover of other robots in the vicinity. Basically stuxnet all over the world with the ability to do all of the things that poster said. You don't need to be Chinese to understand that those sensors combined with that intentional vulnerability are worth way more than the robot itself when placed next to the right target.
>>
>>2959016
That's not what I'm saying. I'm that because I said that would be breaking the law, and you said that Chinese companies don't care about breaking the law, you must be suggesting he is Chinese and therefore willing to break the law, otherwise your statement is non-sequitur and I assumed you wouldn't do that.
Do you at least recognise that publishing state secrets in a coombot thread is absurd? Any killer robot plan has to be in collaboration with a state, and he would have just posted about things which obviously wouldn't be cleared for publication.
>>
>>2959024
That's why I'm asking if you're ESL.
>Doing those things with the data would be illegal
>Chinese companies don't give a shit about what is legal or not
>The poster saying they could do those things with the data making the robots more valuable than the MSRP does not need to be Chinese to know this
>>
>>2959028
So you're saying you think that the company this poster supposedly works for is an integrator of Unitree robots? You're posting about Unitree security flaws, but you don't think he's Chinese, so that's the only conclusion left.
Why would Unitree even tell the company they're selling to "hey, we're going to to do covert illegal things with the robots we sell you"? Any company would be stupid to take a product like that where they're being told outright that the provider will be stealing PINs and passwords.
Just, think about it, think about whether it sounds believable to you, or whether it's just some made up shit online.
>>
>>2959032
Ok I'm certain you're ESL now. At no point did he claim to work for a Chinese company and I didn't imply he did either. It's publicly known that the unitree robots have an exploit of hard coded admin access that can be used to control an entire network of robots if they're in range. The rest is just inferred from logically understanding what those sensors can do with malicious intent.
>>
>>2959046
English is my first and basically only language.
You're not addressing any of my points. You're so committed to your Metal Gear Solid killer robots idea that you can't even read anything that might bring that into question.
Who is doing the spying, in your opinion, and paying over $200,000 per person? Who is going to control these killer robots?
>>
>>2959047
>Paying
Something having a high monetary value doesn't imply that somebody is paying that monetary value. In fact it's better that they get it for free because people all fucking retarded and would gladly let a trojan horse into their homes if you sell it at a discount.
Unitree makes the robots and part of their funding is from the Chinese Communist party.
Article 7 of the Chinese National Intelligence law requires all organizations and citizens to comply with state data collection demands. That means if the CCP wants to access the various sensors of the network of robots, they can. And so the question becomes, how much is a bipedal remotely controllable robot that can self destructs at will worth to an intelligence organization? The answer was provided by that poster that you think needs to be Chinese. In reality you just need common sense.
Honestly it would be better if you were ESL. Now you're just being obtuse at best and retarded at worst.
>>
>>2959051
It's a nice sounding bit of conjecture, but where is your proof that these values given are based on anything at all?
Where are you pulling this "self destruct at will" stuff from too? How do you suppose that will work, and how will it be better than just sending a person to cause harm?
The truth is, it would be fairly easy for a state to kill almost anyone on Earth. Just look at the United Healthcare CEO assassination as an example of how you don't even need state-level resources, then look at some more extreme cases like Iranian scientists being killed by Israel, which can get very advanced. The problem is it's usually easy to trace that killing back to a state, which has significant political implications, and is generally more trouble than its worth.
The CCP using a Chinese made robot to somehow (unspecified how at the moment) kill a person has got to be one of the most traceable methods available.
>Honestly it would be better if you were ESL. Now you're just being obtuse at best and retarded at worst.
There's no point in trading petty insults.
>>
>>2959051
>>2959065
And a bit more as well because you still haven't addressed this. Why is Unitree, the CCP, or anyone else, making this password stealing killer robot stuff known to anyone at all, and why is that person then posting what would be a globally significant secret here?
Use Occam's Razor. Which is more likely? What you are proposing, or a fake post?
>>
>>2959007
No I'm a White American who's a contractor and works in robotics. That estimated value per robot was taken from an investigation on companies selling humanoids at a loss like optimus, unitree and neo. We cannot even come close in price ours will be close to 50k (industrial market who need a larger and stronger bot over other offerings), which is almost double from others. BTW almost everything on that list is illegal, but if you really think that's going to stop anyone even someone like Tesla, I have a bridge to sell you. Tesla/Amazon/Google/Apple already siphon insane amounts of data, much of which would be considered illegal. Unitree doing the same is no different.
The killer robot stuff is a meme but it's still a real possibility. If you can't realize this, you deserve to be robo executed.
>>2959024
>MUH LAWS
Do you realize no one gives a fuck? This era is literal silent WW3, the information war. If you think adversaries who want nothing more for your country to fail and for you to die are going to follow your laws, I have a second bridge to sell you.
>>2959066
>Why is Unitree, the CCP, or anyone else, making this password stealing killer robot stuff known to anyone at all
If you actually look into it, it was discovered, Unitree/CCP weren't advertising they have security vulnerabilities and are siphoning data. You're arguing against strawmen. They were caught doing it and didn't fix it. This proves the security stuff is intentional and when questioned on the data being sent back, they never responded, which proves they don't want to talk about what's being captured at all.
that list is just a bunch of stuff that CAN be stolen via a robot, not that this is exactly what was found to be stolen.
>globally significant secret here
not really, they printed that estimated value per robot being sold at a loss on paper which was never tracked and recollected, it's not some major secret. anyone could have taken the paper home (many did) and it get lost
>>
>>2959205
>No I'm a White American who's a contractor and works in robotics.
I believed that to be so. The clause about you being Chinese is part of the question posed to the other poster. I think that might be part of why he and I were not able to talk properly, because he thought that was something I was claiming, and only the second part was a question.
>That estimated value per robot was taken from an investigation on companies selling humanoids at a loss like optimus, unitree and neo.
This would have been a lot clearer if we knew these were speculative values rather than planned values.
>The killer robot stuff is a meme but it's still a real possibility. If you can't realize this, you deserve to be robo executed.
It's a possibility in the same way that any type of assassination is a possibility. People get all worked up about robots because they've seen too many scifi movies. If a state wants you killed, they already have a way of autonomously moving and firing a gun. A man with a gun. They're not going to be mass executing civilians with these things anyway. Maybe they can clumsily execute one or two people before everyone catches on, and then we all switch off our robo maids. It's a one and done technique that requires a whole industry to be built up and then knocked down again after use. There are far easier ways for a state to assassinate basically anyone that already exist and are in use. e.g. Novichok assassinations.
>This era is literal silent WW3, the information war.
Metal Gear Solid.
Sure, China isn't going to follow laws it doesn't want, and I found most of the rest of your post believable because of that, but after a point in a BCA breaking the law has a higher cost in terms of detection, reputation loss, and product disuse than benefit. The password stealing one crosses that line, and when I replied about laws it seemed your post was purporting to contain actual budget values rather than speculative ones. That was the claim that was unbelievable.
>>
>>
>>2961157
It's not just that simple. When batteries explode it's not like a shrapnel grenade.
Still doesn't address how it's a better method than sending a man with a gun either. It has to beat "man with a gun" to be worth destroying an industry over.
If they claim it's an accident, how many times do you think that will work as an excuse against meaningful targets? Once? Maybe twice? Again, it's not worth building up and tearing down a whole industry when they already have men with guns, men with jerrycans of gasoline, men with grenades, rockets launched at aircraft, Novichok style poisons. There are so many different ways states have available to assassinate people they think the payoff is worth it for, and none of them require destroying a billions of dollars industry so they wil always be preferred over this ineffective and inefficient method.
Just think about it. That industry worth billions is a much better tool for harming America economically than any potential gains to be had from killing maybe one person in a stupider way than methods they already have available.
>>
File: IMG_1627.png (89.3 KB)
89.3 KB PNG
This robot is missing a face
https://youtu.be/l63OrgqqWPU
>>
>>
>>2962147
The doll part wobbles around quite a bit when the roomba stops.
How are you controlling the roomba? If you have direct control of the motors maybe you could have them come to a smoother stop and prevent this rocking when the base stops. There are open source firmwares for robot vacuum cleaners out there, though their availability will depend on your model specifically. (Many of them are just reskinned versions of each other, even from different companies, so you might be able to port it if not.)
>>
>>2962440
>The doll part wobbles around quite a bit when the roomba stops.
Yeah, I noticed that too. Aot of the problems come from the soft carpet my place has.
>How are you controlling the roomba?
Remote that came with it
>There are open source firmwares for robot vacuum cleaners out there, though their availability will depend on your model specifically. (Many of them are just reskinned versions of each other, even from different companies, so you might be able to port it if not.)
Interesting. I don't really know the model, I just know what the specific model looks like. I bet a more expensive vacuum has more control.
>>
>>2962553
>Aot of the problems come from the soft carpet my place has.
I think it's just a leverage thing. The doll is tall compared to the roomba you'll get this wobble no matter what surface it's on.
>Interesting. I don't really know the model, I just know what the specific model looks like. I bet a more expensive vacuum has more control.
It's not really a matter of how expensive the vacuum cleaner is, because probably none of them have this gradual decceleration on stock firmware because there's just no need for them.
Try and find the model (there might be a product code on the bottom you can look up if not the full model name). Take a look here too at other efforts to get more control over these cleaners:
https://valetudo.cloud/
>>
>>
File: Galateav3headdesigns.jpg (139.3 KB)
139.3 KB JPG
>>
We have a Christmas party in /christmas/!
https://trashchan.xyz/christmas/index.html
The /robowaifu/ embassy thread
https://trashchan.xyz/christmas/thread/3110.html
Livestreams and more! Plenty other boards are participating!
>>
>>
>>
This kind of stuff really bothers me not just physically but spiritually as well, like a sickness of the very soul itself.
Men shouldn't consider a machine to be an actual alternative to human companionship, it's completely unnatural and unhealthy, and I really hope the advocates in here are simply young men with minds warped by isolation and pornography that they can get help for.
While I'm generally progressive, I pray that when technology gets to the point of full scale 'companion' robots it is either banned or at the very least highly regulated.
>>
File: uglies.jpg (101 KB)
101 KB JPG
>>2967673
Jealous feminist hands typed this post
While you're free to not like companion robots, and even free to think of me as bad, the fact that you think it's a horrible mental illness, and you want it to be banned, as in against the law, as in criminal charges for making/owning a mere friendly robot, makes it very obvious that you are an angry misandrist feminist with an agenda.
>>
>>
>>
>>2967673
r9k chuddite here
this is the only alterative to true isolation
not everybody is a just a "failed" normalfag who can get better
this is the closest thing to a companion we will EVER get
also who the fuck wants kids in current year lol
>>
>>2967723
That's different, and a far cry from replacing her with some plastic sex doll that will never be able to match up to a real woman.
>>2967753
>True isolation
There are plenty of women who would be open to dating you. The problem is your standards being too high, which, upon facing the reality, leads you to 'give up' and whine about society instead of humbling your ego and looking for someone closer to your level. This is also what most of the hype about robot 'girlfriends' really is: men not wanting to accept they can't have model tier women and looking for artificial substitutes to pretend they can.
>>
>>2967816
>it's different because...it just is, okay?!
That, combined with your rant about how modern men just need to man up and settle for lower-quality women (despite hoeflation already being a thing), only further shows that you're just a jealous ugly feminist, or at least a completely pussywhipped male feminist
Remember, no one is forcing anyone to have companion robots, but you're still throwing a fit about men willingly using companion robots
>>
File: images_medium_cr4c00785_0009.gif (52.2 KB)
52.2 KB GIF
Gonna drop this man made horror here.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00785
>>
>>
>>2967859
>Lower quality women
Modern men have abandoned their role to provide and protect their women and families - that is why there is such a relationship crisis in the West today, men avoiding responsibility in favour of juvinile, selfish pleasure seeking and women having to respond to that. Until this elephant in the room is confronted nothing will change, but it seems some men would rather abandon reality and admitting fault to live in a delusional, perverted fantasy of walking and talking sexdolls serving their every whim. Peter Pan syndrome for the AI era.
>>
>>
File: zatf6hdaxqe71.jpg (21.4 KB)
21.4 KB JPG
I guess this better than making fuckdolls out of human skeletons
https://youtu.be/jPiUN8fb3Og?si=zRu8lnJ9ilChijEm
>>
>>
>>2967683
nta but you just outed yourself as a desperate loser. I didn't even pay attention to the fact that your robot was "female" until this post of yours. Now it's kind of obvious your project has a sexual undertone and stems from your frustration with women. Women are easier to fuck than robots, considering all the technical issues and hoops you have to go through to get a robot vs scoring on a date. You're actually wired by default to be attracted to women so it makes natural sense that you should learn to play the "game" and get a woman for yourself. Instead you're devoting your life to aquiring an artificial, lifeless copy of a woman. You robot has the feminine features - it's obvious you're attracted to females, but you choose to withdraw yourself and cope with your penis in a recycled plastic bottle because some woman offended you at some point in your life. I think feminism is jewish propaganda but at least women who got hooked on it try to fight back the reality they believe in. You're surrendering.
Should robots be banned? Probably not, but people like you serve a good argument that robot companions will have detremental effect on some degenerates out there and it's not healthy. You're a male equivalent of a lonely woman that fucks dogs and as a society we agree fucking dogs is not okay.
>>
File: IMG_6527.jpg (359.4 KB)
359.4 KB JPG
Soon...
>>
>>2970129
>I didn't even pay attention to the fact that your robot was "female" until this post of yours. Now it's kind of obvious your project has a sexual undertone and stems from your frustration with women.
If it wasn't obvious that the MAID robot with a dress, long hair, and an hourglass shape is a woman, then you need to see an optometrist
>yap yap yap
tradcuck and/or feminist yapping. yawn
>You're a male equivalent of a lonely woman that fucks dogs and as a society we agree fucking dogs is not okay.
"Erm your robot is just like women committing actual bestiality" you are brain damaged and longhoused. All your yapping about how it's "detrimental" has no actual basis since there's no actual negative effects. Why doesn't your busybody-ass go and protest vibrators and Bad Dragon?
Depending on if you're a tradcuck or coping woman, I have a message for your wife-master or you, respectively
You're not entitled to male attention, it's giving incel vibes. Go to therapy and unpack this.
>>
>>2970138
>If it wasn't obvious that the MAID robot with a dress, long hair, and an hourglass shape is a woman, then you need to see an optometrist
I was giving you benefit of the doubt that you just picked one of two genders for whatever reason, now it's clear it's your coping mechanism
>All your yapping about how it's "detrimental" has no actual basis since there's no actual negative effects.
Lmao and what's the negative effect of being fucked by a dog? You're in the same category - butthurt over the opposite gender, sexually frustrated, looking for bizarre outlets. How you can pretend you have some kind of authority in this discussion, yelling buzzwords from depths of your gooncave is beyond me
>Go to therapy and unpack this.
Says dude that mounted phone and a cheap wig on a sewing mannequin and called it his robot wife
>>
>>
>>2970141
>Lmao and what's the negative effect of being fucked by a dog?
I don't need to say anything, this speaks well enough about how you see the world
>Says dude that mounted phone and a cheap wig on a sewing mannequin and called it his robot wife
"I described something in reductive terms, that means I win"
Devil's advocate; let's say I'm "frustrated" and "coping". Why are you bitching and whining? Do you have a phobia of robots? Do you also pester and moralize to women with vibrators and "romance" novels? If so, you better leave me alone and get to work, there are a lot of them!
>>
>>
>>2970143
>I don't need to say anything, this speaks well enough about how you see the world
I say both are bad and comparable. You claim they're not comparable but can't explain how
>"I described something in reductive terms, that means I win"
it's funny how you throw bunch of demeaning and reductive assumptions in order to offend me and then whine that I didn't describe all your sick efforts in detail. I didn't need to, putting a phone on a manequin and calling it a woman is crazy enough.
>Why are you bitching and whining?
I'm simply partaking in the discussion about morality of utilizing robots as replacement for human interaction. It's entirely possible to be fascinated by robotics and concept of humanoid robot without having sexual frustration and compulsive desire to fuck it - not that you'd know anything about that, apparently.
>>
>>2970145
>I say both are bad and comparable. You claim they're not comparable but can't explain how
You genuinely think fucking a dog is the same as an android partner?! Wow, you really are just a coping woman
>I'm simply partaking in the discussion about morality of utilizing robots as replacement for human interaction
LMAO, "morality". Sureeeee, whatever you say brave crusader. If "morality" is just Karens bitching, then yeah, I'm "immoral". Funny how you never address the hypocrises I bring up. You're not entitled to male attention, incel. Go back to your minotaur booktok novels. You're just a horse, whining about the Model T.
>>
>>2970152
>You genuinely think fucking a dog is the same as an android partner?! Wow, you really are just a coping woman
You genuinely think it isn't? Wow, you really are just a spineless canfucker
Btw the only thing 'android' about your 'partner' is the operating system in phone you mounted on a sewing mannequin.
>LMAO, "morality". Sureeeee
go figure it's an abstract concept to someone that wants to fuck a robot lmao
>Funny how you never address the hypocrises I bring up
You're not bringing up any hypocrises, you're just pointing to other groups of people and saying they're also degenerate as if it was supposed to change anything about you, lmao. Like I wouldn't know that when I mentioned that women fuck dogs for the same reasons you want to fuck a toaster. You're trying to divert the discussion towards judging others because subconciously you understand you're doing something wrong. That's precisely the point I'm making and it's worth considering; faces of 'waifu robotics' are lonely degenerates with bad attitude. Perhaps that shouldn't be promoted.
>>
>>
>>2970171
>More female cope.
I'm not a female, your assumption that I am is cope.
> Lmao at you trying to elevate fucking dogs
You think I'm elevating it because you think you're better than dogfuckers :^)
>yadda yadda
It's funny how you straight up shit on women yet you spend your time trying to build one. There's approx. 4.1 bilion females on this planet. If you think you couldn't live happily with just a single one out of that 4.1 billion pool then it's simply your fault and you're the problem - no companion will make you truly happy, because you're a miserable person with personal issues. You have your disabled cumcan you're proud of, yet you still come here for validation from actual human beings. The actual solution to your problems is to simply get a grip. You'd save time, trouble and mental health if you just learned how to talk to women instead learning all that technical shit. Robotics isn't meant for human therapy. Robots are tools and weapons.
>>
>>2970175
>I'm not a female, your assumption that I am is cope.
Well you talk like one
>you think you're better than dogfuckers
Uhhh, yeah. I'm very certain I'm better than people that have sex with animals. Female depravity knows no bounds.
And more yapping. Did Fido have a headache Miss?
>>
>>2970180
>Well you talk like one
how would you know, the closest thing to a female in your life is a roomba
>Uhhh, yeah. I'm very certain I'm better than people that have sex with animals
If you personificate a robot then you make an assumption that it's just another form of intelligence, another spieces, there's no difference between fucking a dog and a robot. Both dog and a robot have economical use, both dog and a robot get adopted, both dog and a robot are used sexually by lonely freaks.
>And more yapping. Did Fido have a headache Miss?
I simply pointed out that this robot of yours is a vent for your sexual frustration and you end up projecting that I'm a woman who fucks dogs. I rest my case, you're a freak with shitty character and people considering taking the robopill should ask themselves if they want to become someone like you in their pursuit of happiness.
>>
>>2970184
>how would you know, the closest thing to a female in your life is a roomba
Because women come and whine about my roomba
>If you personificate a robot then you make an assumption that it's just another form of intelligence, another spieces, there's no difference between fucking a dog and a robot. Both dog and a robot have economical use, both dog and a robot get adopted, both dog and a robot are used sexually by lonely freaks.
What the fuck?
>I rest my case, you're a freak with shitty character
If a simp/feminist hates my "character", then I consider it a success. Why would I want to be "normal" if you're what normal is
>should ask themselves if they want to become someone like you in their pursuit of happiness.
As opposed to a supposedly male feminist who is mentally castrated like you?
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: IMG_1759.jpg (20.6 KB)
20.6 KB JPG
The point is artificial wombs for babies, sex bots for sex and roasties as trophy wives.
Pic related is robot tsunade. They dont make many of those theres the whole genetic engineering too i guess but thats outside of the realm of the garage builder unless they want a room full of dead fetuses. Well and yeah artificial wombs too.
>>
>>2967893
I remember the survey asking women what hobbies they liked or disliked in men, the worst was "arguing online with strangers" and "playing videogames" was pretty far down as well.
The other commenter told you that modern men behaved like spoiled children which is the impression those hobbies would give a woman. Think about your income and ask yourself whether it'd be feasible to pay for a house with kids. No woman out there is looking for a baby.
>>
>>2971117
>The point is artificial wombs for babies
That's not a thing, artificial womb doesn't work the way you think it does. I also dont understand why you'd want to be a single father lol
>sex bots for sex and roasties as trophy wives.
Somehow I don't think you will be the one that shapes the new world order, you know. Realistically, fucking robots will be just a niche for broken gooners. Robots will become another way for the government to spy on you and you will have to pay monthly subscription to keep chinaman from deactivating your waifu. Also, it will probably damage your anus during the eventually inevitable pegging
>Pic related is robot tsunade.
Pic related is a 3d render of a 3d model downloaded from a porn website.
>They dont make many of those
They dont make any of those
>>
>>2971140
An inventor always shapes the new world order. Just like the person who invented the steam engine or the wheel and the plow. All robots are a micro revolution.
I do intend to make a portion if the fu opensource for that reason except for maybe the lower half(unless i get a patent ir something but its super tedious)
I know they plan to make subcription fus which is why also you should buy if i sell things.
>>
File: c61[1].jpg (91.2 KB)
91.2 KB JPG
>>2971117
>>2971140
>>2971151
Man, I can't even be bothered to use my fleshlight because cleaning it is a chore. How the fuck do you hose out a sex doll without it being a fucking Broadway production?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: galatea neocities.png (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB PNG
Updated to 3.0.8
-Upgraded Shoulder Segment
-Made new aesthetically-pleasing forearms with upgraded speaker holder
-Rotated claw on (her) right arm by 180 degrees for easier adjustment
-Upgraded claw by simplifying design with less parts and easier adjustment nut/dial
-Added humanoid hand to (her) left arm
-Manual is corrected
https://greertech.neocities.org/Galatea%20v3.0
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: 1766060006331751.jpg (12.5 KB)
12.5 KB JPG
>>2955458
>it can scratch your back
>>2972503
>Oh, sorry, it can't move it's arms
>>
>>
>>
>>2967816
>some plastic sex doll that will never be able to match up to a real woman.
bitch i am very successful with the ladies but if there would be a proper sexrobot id take that over a real woman anyday. you bitches are just not worth the trouble. the more of you i lay or get into relationships with the more i hate. i purely hatefuck women nowadays.
as for this thread: i am pleasantly surprised this isnt just a bunch of schizo coomers here. i will be lurking more often now.
>>
>>
>>2972931
So it can't scratch your back, it's just a janitor closet on a roomba. Want your robo waifu to scratch your back? Call in your roomba praying it won't trip on its way due to a big plastic mast on top of it which displaces its mass center, then deatach the arm, scratch yourself with it and insert it back into a plastic pipe holder.
Why not just go all the way with the bullshit and say your robot can defend the home from intruders because you can attach a knife to it
>>
>>2973217
>Call in your roomba praying it won't trip on its way due to a big plastic mast on top of it which displaces its mass center
I made sure to balance out the weight and reduce mass to avoid tipping. It shouldn't tip, especially if you have hard floors.
>>
File: Roomba Coathanger.mp4 (1.3 MB)
1.3 MB MP4
>>2973294
your janitor wife moves slower than your grandma and has worse balance than your grandma. At the same time, your grandma can truly autonomously scratch your back, move and moan in bed and has a pussy. She can probably cook, too. You yap about women, many of which are pure 10/10, but settle on something that's outclassed by your grandma. Weird.
>>
>>
>>
>>2973415
>My robot can XYZ
>It can't, it's barely stable
>No way man, I balanced it all out!
>*roomba dubiously wobbles when stopping at insane speed of 0.002mph*
>you're just a troll!
kek, we wouldn't have this conversation if you wouldn't keep lying about functionalities and performance of your "robot"
>>2973524
I wouldn't fuck a pvc skeleton either, whats your point
>>
>>
>>2973530
I came here for the robotics, instead I got a literal incel who put a plastic pipe on a roomba and claims it can scratch your back lol
But I'm glad you're trying to offend me by implying I'd fuck your robot, because it means deep down inside you know it's demeaning
>>
>>2973537
>But I'm glad you're trying to offend me by implying I'd fuck your robot, because it means deep down inside you know it's demeaning
Nowhere did I say that. I said that you put a lot of focus and attention on a robot you supposedly don't care about
>I came here for the robotics
So where's your robot or robotics discussion? Seems like you dedicate all your time to a robot you totally don't care about.
>"insell!!!"
Okay roastie
>>
>>2973587
>So where's your robot
I build CNC machines, I'm 20000 leagues closer to robotics than a guy who mounted coathanger on a store bought roomba, sorry bud
>robotics discussion?
I tried to discuss functionality of your robot due to your misleading comments, also taking into an account that your robot is supposed to be a replacement for women. You make dumb claims to garner attention and then get pissed at responses lol
>>
>>2973598
>I build CNC machines
Well, that's good to hear. Is that for a job or your hobby? If it's your job, do you also work with CNC machines on your own time? See how nice it is when we have positive discussion?
>I tried to discuss functionality of your robot
If you call that discussion, then you need to work on your interpersonal skills.
>also taking into an account that your robot is supposed to be a replacement for women
Well, considering Galatea isn't having continuous hookups, 10 abortions/year, being generally cruel and misandrist, dressing like a hooker, voting for destructive policies, or advocating for censorship while at the same time reading "booktok" bestiality novels, I'm going to say she's doing a good job
>>
>>
>>2973604
>See how nice it is when we have positive discussion?
Is it? You're forcing a discussion about me all the time, only this time with friendly questions, while I'm obviously not showcasing anything and this isn't my personal blogspace. CNC isn't considered robotics, especially in theme of this thread so why would we talk about me and my work
>you need to work on your interpersonal skills.
You're a shut in that places his affection in a self propelled vacuum cleaner, get off your high horse. You claim your thing can scratch one's back - that's simply not true, what kind of answer did you expect after making such claim?
>Well, considering Galatea isn't having continuous hookups, 10 abortions/year, being generally cruel and misandrist, dressing like a hooker, voting for destructive policies, or advocating for censorship while at the same time reading "booktok" bestiality novels, I'm going to say she's doing a good job
You can't name a single woman that actually does all of this.
>>
>>
>>2973681
>Is it? You're forcing a discussion about me all the time, only this time with friendly questions, while I'm obviously not showcasing anything and this isn't my personal blogspace. CNC isn't considered robotics, especially in theme of this thread so why would we talk about me and my work
Jeez who pissed in your cheerios?
>>
File: IMG_2421.jpg (3.2 MB)
3.2 MB JPG
We all can stay in the robot thread after we’re all properly credited in the pic on the op. You can use this pic next time ill be done with the head before march hopefully.
>>
>>
>>
>>
File: galatea cute.jpg (95.9 KB)
95.9 KB JPG
>>
>>
File: IMG_2778.jpg (147.5 KB)
147.5 KB JPG
>>2973825
You all assume things without taking account that guns have kicks that can break the robot arms
>>
>>
>>2955458
Not that Anon (or anybody who's posted in this thread so far) but I think you could try to implement some actual robotic motions on your doll. You could start with something simple, like bending one arm with a pair of motors. It might seem rather uninteresting at first, but once you start exploring topics like linkages, gear ratios, controlling current in motors so as to optimize speed, and then getting just the right acceleration-deceleration ramps, you could eventually end up with a simple, but very smooth-looking result.
I was a huge fan of robot anime back when I was a teenager, really big into the whole idea of robot wives, but honestly I think that the best way forward for DIYers is to start with simple robotic projects.
First the arm, then the cup-holder, after that the moving leg, and from there on more elaborate stuff like hands and feet.
I honestly do not want to shame you, but I do think it is good to at least try accomplishing something simple using components you chose and assembled together, even if it doesn't necessarily look very aesthetically pleasing at first, than to seek for grandiose all-encompassing projects, or to settle for ready-made solutions.
Good luck to you and to everyone else on this general thread.
>>
>>2956845
>I will not be using external PSU's
>>2956936
>Aliexpress servos are not up to the task.
Those servomotors usually need about 5V with a current of roughly 300mA. Your RP2040 can safely output up to 50mA, so in order for that to work, you'd need some transistors connected to a 5VDC power supply (I'd suggest using an old charger that can output 100-500mA) so as to supply the servomotors with the current needed.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>you could try to implement some actual robotic motions on your doll. You could start with something simple, like bending one arm with a pair of motors.
He can't do it because the whole thing is not balanced properly. Roomba was designed as a vacuum cleaner and as such has basic movement with big torque spikes and drops. Meanwhile, the skeleton mounted on top of it is just a couple of hollow pipes that wobble with each sudden velocity change - see
>>2973407 (You)
Now imagine mounting a motor on elbow or even arm of this thing. It would keep tipping over or the skeleton would keep breaking from weird tension distribution. The weight would be a siginifican problem too - roomba isn't supposed to carry weight, it barely plows through with that skeleton on, add couple of motors and it won't be able to beat static friction. The core problem of this project is that it's a 7th grader science project and it's unfit for any reasonable modifications. In the meantime the creator is nothing but proud and defensive about it, making bogus claims here and there. The real problem of GreerTech is not a design problem, it's human resources problem. Fire person responsible for PR and the technology and the project will be good.
>>
>>2974637
That does sound interesting. My rationale for not including motorized arms is that it would increase the complexity and cost for no good reason. Maybe I can have a "dev Galatea" and a "consumer Galatea". I did have an idea for pre-made animations, like voice commands for "hug", "raise your arm", etc... If I had good programming knowledge, I would love to have her follow me with her head, but unfortunately, I am not good at programming.
A good example of your ethos AND my rationale is the XLeRobot. I had the idea of using that tech with a humanoid torso and head on top of the cart, basically only changing the form. However, if you read in the documentation, it's basically still remote control.
https://github.com/Vector-Wangel/XLeRobot
Your ethos is very wise, and there are talented devs developing like that.
https://alogs.space/robowaifu/catalog.html
>>
>>
>>2974760
lol, do you feel like you debunked anything that I said? You're free to claim you're too retarded to seriously think of making actual robot with moving arms - it doesn't change the fact that you wouldn't be able to anyway if you tried.
>doomposting
doom of what, a vacuum cleaner with bunch of plastic pipes?
>>
>>