... I can only imagine how constipated they must be

>>3049693
“The inhabitants of Jannah will eat and drink, they will not spit, urinate or pass stool and urine nor will they have mucus. They asked, Then what would happen to the food?’ Nabi (sallallahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: ‘They would belch and sweat and their sweat would be that of musk. They would be inspired to glorify and praise Allah as easily as you breathe”

What happens if they need to take a shit

what about images where the anus is just censored, but the pussy is not? are those acceptable?

>>3049694
>no one is allowed to piss, shit, or fart
lame desu

File: __original_drawn_by_ayase_mio__2f0dbe7668e162d4b0cfd75f2a75c78f.png (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB PNG

>>3049897
they don't need to take a shit. the food is converted into pure energy inside them

>>3049899
no, this is specifically about the body part not existing

>>3049912
how often do you consume media in which girls piss, shit or fart?

>>3049694
Definitely sounds like heaven to me. though it would be better if there were no need to sweat or burp either.

>>3049916
now I got an urge to see if i can edit those censored pics to remove the anus entirely...

File: anime781FNA.jpg (897.7 KB)

897.7 KB JPG

And here is my first edit tempt!

File: anim8990FNA.jpg (458.5 KB)

458.5 KB JPG

and another one!

>>3051216
The duality of man.

>>3051304
good job repeating the filename

File: anime807FC2.jpg (156.5 KB)

156.5 KB JPG

>>3049694
but can you still cum? If not then how would orgasm work?

here another edit. If you go by the time the image was created this would technicly be the first.

>>3051269
>though it would be better if there were no need to sweat or burp either.
yeah, don't know why he included the burps. I mean, a bit of sweat is fine I guess, if it doesn't smell bad and isn't overly concentrated in certain areas. also I'd accept sneezes and light tummy rumbles because that's cute. I'll have to talk with the one in charge about that

>>3051286
nice. maybe you can work around the edges a bit more, so that it looks less like something's been taped over

>>3051367
>but can you still cum?
I guess so, yeah, otherwise it would be kind of a dull experience. but your cum would probably be pearl white and smell like honey and flowers or something

File: anime65FNA.jpg (529.3 KB)

529.3 KB JPG

newest edit!

Ibukia from the dangan ronpa!

File: fh8.png (988.9 KB)

988.9 KB PNG

>>3051495
if you'll accept a suggestion, maybe with a picture like this you can also try to get rid off the ass spread as well, to make it look less like she wants to draw attention to something that isn't even there. i worked on your edit a bit more just for a proof of concept

Is this some advanced form of autism or something?

File: gn389389.jpg (1.8 MB)

1.8 MB JPG

>>3051740
>Is this some advanced form of autism or something?
Yes, or put another way, it's a longing for purity. I honestly find it surprising that this subject isn't more established. Anime girls get depicted with all kinds of fantastical body modifications, but somehow just eliminating the most disgusting body part is far more niche. People seem to immediately jump to the question how such a body would work, even though their suspension of disbelief works just fine in other cases, and even though the functioning of that body part is virtually never depicted or addressed in the context of anime girls and thus might as well be thought of as non-existing. Or put another way, I would guess "anime girls don't shit" is a pretty common notion, so this is just consequential

>>3051752
It's the uncanny valley between human-like and barbie doll; even if you don't care for it being there or even notice it, the absence suddenly looks unnatural and weird.

File: ng3900.jpg (774.7 KB)

774.7 KB JPG

>>3051813
Do you look at assholes so often that it becomes part of your mental image of what a human should look like? They look weird to begin with, just like inner organs look weird, because they're not meant to be seen, they're not part of the public-facing body. I don't think that's it. Not even anime girls lacking nostrils most of the time triggers your uncanny valley response

>>3051830
I don't need to look at ears all the time to immediately notice when one is missing on someone, and so it goes with the anus.

>>3049681
...b-but that's the best part of a girl!

File: gigachad.jpg (65.1 KB)

65.1 KB JPG

>>3051830
>Do you look at assholes so often that it becomes part of your mental image of what a human should look like?
Yes.

File: anim9051FNA.png (684 KB)

684 KB PNG

and another of my edits.

File: f3b9.jpg (548.2 KB)

548.2 KB JPG

>there are more posters complaining about this thread than posters who contribute
>somehow assholes being disgusting is a controversial opinion

>>3051830
>Do you look at assholes so often that it becomes part of your mental image of what a human should look like?
...anon. That IS what a human should look like. Humans have assholes.
>because they're not meant to be seen, they're not part of the public-facing body.
So is the innards of the pussy but you literally have pussy spreading pics in this thread and you aren't complaining about those.
>Not even anime girls lacking nostrils most of the time triggers your uncanny valley response
Because you don't normally see the nostrils of a person unless their head is tilted back or they're a who from Dr. Seuss (and in those cases its wried and people get surgery to hide this). No matter what, if you spread an ass or even see a pussy in a lot of ways you'll see an asshole. No exceptions. Where there is an anus there is an anus.
Bro you don't need to cope. You just have a strange kink. We all know its weird, including yourself. Just accept it and move on. Logic will not win you this one.

File: fn3090.jpg (553.6 KB)

553.6 KB JPG

>>3052010
>...anon. That IS what a human should look like. Humans have assholes.
My argument is that with body parts not usually seen or meant to be seen, there is no "should". Yes, it looks a certain way in reality, but it might as well not. You would't care if some magical force made all human kidneys a different shape, and if you weren't so porn-brained as we all are, it would be the same with the asshole
>So is the innards of the pussy but you literally have pussy spreading pics in this thread and you aren't complaining about those.
You're right, the same goes for if the innards of the pussy. It doesn't matter if it's realistic or different, but in this case there's just no need to divert from realism because it's not disgusting. (btw do YOU complain about x-ray H-scenes where the womb gets filled with cum? definitely not what it looks like in reality)
>Because you don't normally see the nostrils of a person
...what?
>Bro you don't need to cope. You just have a strange kink. We all know its weird, including yourself. Just accept it and move on. Logic will not win you this one.
If you don't see assholes as a mere necessary evil, you're the one with the strange kink. If you had the power to create a more perfect reality and you didn't get rid of the need to digest and defacate, you're the one with the strange kink. This fantasy is as natural as imagining a world without aging or illness. If people were able to transcend their dirty and frail animal nature, they would, and that's what all major religions have been about for the last 2000 years

>but it might as well not.
Yes but every living human on this planet has an anus. What you're looking for is something more obscure and rare than amputee porn.
>>3052051
>but in this case there's just no need to divert from realism because it's not disgusting
According to who? Your feelings? This isn't a logical argument because you're actively removing SOME normal human anatomy because its disgusting to you. So your argument to begin was "well you dont always see it front facing so its diagusting." Now you're saying "okay so that isnt front facing but I just dont find it disgusting." Logicless.
>...what?
You don't, hence why nasal flaring is unattractive, represents disgust or aggression, and people spend billions to have it fixed with corrective surgery. The most attractive facial features has the nostrils covered with the shape of the nose itself. You know this is true, don't pretend like you don't get my point.
>If you don't see assholes as a mere necessary evil, you're the one with the strange kink.
>necessary
That's rich coming from the dude completely removing something that is necessary. LMAO
>If you had the power to create a more perfect reality and you didn't get rid of the need to digest and defacate, you're the one with the strange kink. This fantasy is as natural as imagining a world without aging or illness. If people were able to transcend their dirty and frail animal nature, they would, and that's what all major religions have been about for the last 2000 years
Bro, we know its a fantasy of yours. You're just getting trashed on because it's a /d/ tier kink. Again, just do your thing but you aren't going to logic your way through this. Just accept your kink is /d/ tier and move on. Or don't. I don't really care that much.

>>3051830
>>3051752
Indeed, giga autism in all its glory.

>>3051752
Its only disgusting if you're a kike who by default can only conceive of disgusting things when thinking of nude women. Scatological obsession is a 100% Jewish trait.

File: vn894.jpg (2.7 MB)

2.7 MB JPG

>>3052065
anon, for someone who comes to argue in a thread he has no interest in on a picture-sharing board, you put surprisingly little effort in following my arguments. anime girls are already idealized females, they are not real humans. it is all a fantasy. none of their body parts are necessary for their survival. I really don't know why you came here to call me weird and autistic, I just tried to explain my motivation but you're not listening. If you love assholes so much, there is an other thread for you. Don't worry, I won't take them away for real

...

and now I'm a giga autist and a kike as well, great

>>3052180
I'm going to assume you made this post because I responded to it >>3051830
You asked a question. I answered it. You responded to my post. I responded to your post. This is how conversation works.
Yes, we understand it's fantasy. Then why even bring up the topic of actual human anatomy? Why even bother defending your posts? You now fall back on "ah well it's a fantasy you can't criticize that!" You attempted to logic it and couldn't and now you claim it's all subjective and can't be scrutinized, despite you trying to do so earlier? You hold a controversial opinion and were open about it. People will challenge you. You're all over the place and probably flustered. A safer space for you would be /d/ where the stranger kinks are allowed because quite frankly this aligns with amputee porn.
For the record, *I* never called you autistic nor weird. Yeah, your kink is awful and you should feel bad, but we all have our quirks and I'm not attacking you personally. Just your bad takes and taste.

>>3052196
>You asked a question. I answered it.
No you didn't. That's my entire point. I was wondering in the post you linked about how a body-part not usually seen could trigger an uncanny-valley response, and you responded with something entirely beside the point. I gave you the benefit of the doubt for some posts, but you came at this in bad faith to begin with, because you're some sort of asshole supremacist who views my preferences as a personal and cultural threat. I know it is far more normal and healthy fantasizing about all kinds of sexual violence, sodomy, bestiality, scat, grotesque proportions etc. than it is to fantasize about simply removing the shit from the human condition like the founder of the second-largest religion on earth did when he talked about paradise, but still I thought it was pretty harmless and self-explaining and wouldn't trigger people that much

>>3052222
>no you didn't
I did. I'll let the posts speak for themselves.
>but you came at this in bad faith to begin with
I've been the most honest and open person with you in this whole thread. Cut the victim complex.
>like the founder of the second-largest religion on earth
Oh I get it. You've got your kink intertwined with your religion. That explains the illogical arguments and the zealous defense. I know it was mentioned earlier but I thought that was a satirical comment. There's no further discussion to be had here.