They both suck should have been every character on the keyboard ip v4

or, just disable it and be done?

>>108055324
ipv6 can suck a dick and die from it for all I care

Luddit take. It is actually much easier to change your IP with IPv6 because you are given a huge prefix and you can just randomly rotate through that. With IPv4 you are stuck with the one IP your ISP gave you.

>>108056844
my isp gives different ip every day since my router is offline for over 16 hours

>>108055324
Only so many IPv4 addresses out there. You can only subnet your problems away for so long.

>>108055324
Motherfucker, IPv6 has existed since 1998, you're barking at the wrong tree.

>>108056844
>luddite
Boy, these fucking Indians sure love using that word.

>>108056856
So you have a shitty ISP, a protocol can't fix that.

>>108055324
Why would you want to change your IP? Most companies I've worked for spend a zillion dollars running their own autonomous system so they can drag IPs around the planet with BGP.

>>108056844
everyone not a drooling retard identifies a user through increasingly widening ip ranges.

>>108055324
You're behind a cgnat, you're not changing your IP.

>>108057054
Which is still better than having one IPv4 address.

>>108057077
it's worse than having a rotatable ipv4 address.

>>108057082
>rotatable ipv4 address.
You sound like the kind of person who gets upset about prostitutes because you're too cheap to enjoy them rather than having some moral complaint.

>>108057145
what in the hell is this fucking analogy supposed to imply?

>>108056859
>unzips CGNAT

>>108056856
Just think for a second how does your ISP know the IP it gave you is not used by anyone and the IP you had is now free for someone to use.

>>108057360 dhcp

how am i able to rent a vps with a unique ipv4 address for $5 a month in this day and age? aren't they all taken?

>>108057581
Good, it works the same for ipv4 and IPv6. If they can trace you on IPv6 they can trace in ipv4.

IPv6 is simply faster and easier on the routers or firewalls because you don't need to NAT. There's several billion dollar to be made from this fact alone.

>>108058299
yes, owned by the vps companies etc.

if you want to make your own company with your own AS and IP ranges you'll have to buy them off the open market instead of just asking some from RIPE or whoever like it used to work

IP source address should be zeroed out. Instead put a third party return address in the payload. Then send a request to that address to get your response (looked up by an id you create). Whats wrong with this, other than being a lil bit slow?

>>108055324
Every time I run into a network problem that the standard network resets don't fix, the solution is to turn off ipv6. Why does it exist if all it causes are problems?

File: 1753431391638272.webm (1.4 MB)

1.4 MB WEBM

>>108060369
That's kind of how it already works, but instead of zeros, you have RFC1918 private IPv4 addresses like 10.x.x.x and 192.168.x.x

>>108055324
It's actually easier to change your IPv6, exactly because there are more.

Yeah the original idea was to keep the last 64 bits and only change the first 64, but very few devices actually do that.

>>108062315
In practice it's not, because an IPv6 prefix change causes a "renumbering event", meaning everything on your network has its IP address changed at the same time, and your ISP can change your prefix at any time. With IPv4 it doesn't really matter because you're not using public IPs and you don't give a fuck about the details beyond your gateway.

>>108062373
>With IPv4 it doesn't really matter because you're not using public IPs
I live alone so my public IP can always be traced back to me.
But even when you have a large family is that really much better?

>>108058299
>unique ipv4 address
LMAO. When you ssh with a "unique" IP the server tries to log you into dozens of VPSes that share the IP and return you the connection that has succeeded.

>>108062427
Most people live behind cgnat.
You're IP is shared with randoms.

File: 1760951613013194.jpg (80.8 KB)

80.8 KB JPG

>>108055324
I want to use IPV6 but I get penalized for it at every turn. The second I let postfix prefer IPV6 on my mail server, which had been sending emails fine to gmail and outlook for years, it immediately started going to spam. They rely so heavily on the fact that there's a finite amount of IPV4 addresses available and their black book of blacklisted addresses.

>>108055324
>Time to switch over and make the leap into the progressive and tolerant IPV6 future.
Let me guess, you can't even wipe your ass because that's gay? You walk around with feces dripping in your pants because you can't do anything about it since that's gay.
You have panic attacks when you see a hotdog.
You smashed your alarm clock with a sledgehammer.
You can't stand to look at your experience points because the bar is making... progress...

Just suck cocks, anon. No one fucking cares. It's ok to be yourself. You don't have to make such a big deal about it all the time. Talk about something else for a change, fucking hell.

>>108062269
The problem is that my IP address gets carried all the way from my router to the host's router in full view. The network doesn't deserve to know that information: it's basically a tracking ID. After the first hop the network shouldn't be able to reveal anything about me. And the response shouldn't reveal anything about me to the network either.

>>108063856
anon....