AI art will never not be slop and AI code will never be functional without human oversight

>solved

>>108056628
Gemini 3 just told me that adding files on disk A causes parity to fail for files disk B in SnapRAID. Even Google AI preview told me that's stupid. The more complex the model, the more they convincingly hallucinate on complex things.

File: pphhhh.gif (273.4 KB)

273.4 KB GIF

>>108056643
Your AI envy is showing.

>>108056695
I wish we had AI

>psychotic indian foaming at the mouth explains AI in his terms.
What e.coli does to a motherfucker.

>>108056643
It's clearly good enough to for many purposes, and it's incrementally getting better.
And it makes it trivial to drown out the human-created noise with slopsignal, to the point that most stuff on Github, and most art that you encounter, and ultimately most 4chan posts, will all be AI-generated.

>>108057238
> for many purposes
purposes such as?

AI art will always be lacking in context past the prompt that the human used and that's why it will always be slop, maybe kitsch at best.

My foreskin is still intact thoughbeit

>>108056628
>Oh no, something to help you with answers, oh no, so bad, why? At a late age why should someone help when it would've been much better with no help. You won't be rich and/or famous?! This is fraud.
NO, you can't be anything you want no matter how hard you work at it.

>>108058329
>>Oh no, something to help you with answers, oh no, so bad, why?
How is generate art on prompting "helping you with answers?"

>>108057243
>purposes such as?
A lot of concept art and commission work has already been largely replaced by AI.

>>108057238
>it's incrementally getting better.
Sure thing, just two more weeks.

>>108057243
Creating garbage.

>>108057350
The thing is, if we at least got foreskin regeneration, along with anti-aging, this wouldn't be so bad.
But instead we get an AI slopnami with none of the upsides AI evangelists promised.