Thread #463293 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
Anonymous
01/02/26(Fri)18:36:05 No.463293 Can anyone here explain or illustrate what the hell this corporate logo is supposed to be? It's driving me absolutely insane. I only see a retarded pelican.
Showing all 15 replies.
>>
Anonymous
01/02/26(Fri)18:38:35 No.463294 seriously, wtf is this?
>>
Anonymous
01/03/26(Sat)03:53:13 No.463297 >>463293
It's a jet, anon. It's flying towards the left, the two lines on the right side are exhaust.
>>
Anonymous
01/03/26(Sat)10:08:33 No.463301 >>463297
I don’t see it
>>
Anonymous
01/07/26(Wed)06:15:17 No.463335 >>463297
>>463301
its a plane but anon means its flying up and to the left, we're looking from behind. weird, because it isn't intuitive and a bit abstract.
>>
Anonymous
01/07/26(Wed)11:13:40 No.463336 >>463335
damn, I actually didn't see this... Just scrolling past I saw an abstract fighter jet like bottom pic
>>
Anonymous
01/07/26(Wed)14:25:09 No.463339 >>463336
if this were true, the proportions are 100% fucking fucked for a corporate logo. How does something like this even get approved?
>>
Anonymous
01/09/26(Fri)03:37:36 No.463358 >>463339
>>463293
its vaguely 'jet-ish' - its not science bros
>>
Anonymous
01/21/26(Wed)10:36:52 No.463442 >>463358
>here’s your logo bro
>its “vague”
>that’ll be $100,000 plus tip
>>
Anonymous
01/21/26(Wed)13:19:53 No.463443 >>463442
yes, Barsan Global Logistics seems pretty upset with their vague logo, dont they?
>>
Anonymous
01/25/26(Sun)15:57:54 No.463492 >>463443
So upset that they went even more abstract in their next rebrand. Now it's even less jet shaped.
>>
Anonymous
01/27/26(Tue)09:41:08 No.463534 >>463492
What the utter FUCK is it supposed to be?
>>
Anonymous
01/28/26(Wed)07:47:43 No.463538 >>463534
its logistical
>>
Anonymous
01/28/26(Wed)14:00:12 No.463539 >>463293
logos need to be recognizable, not scientifically accurate representations hey
>>
Anonymous
01/31/26(Sat)09:20:19 No.463569 >nobody can explain what the logo is
>im still just as baffled as i was 3 weeks ago
>>
Anonymous
01/31/26(Sat)11:51:04 No.463570 >>463569
you are saying you don't believe it to be a plane?
