File: xeqSS.png (633 KB)

633 KB PNG

seriously, wtf is this?

>>463293
It's a jet, anon. It's flying towards the left, the two lines on the right side are exhaust.

>>463297
I don’t see it

>>463297
>>463301
its a plane but anon means its flying up and to the left, we're looking from behind. weird, because it isn't intuitive and a bit abstract.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (52.7 KB)

52.7 KB JPG

>>463335
damn, I actually didn't see this... Just scrolling past I saw an abstract fighter jet like bottom pic

File: wtf is wrong with these people.png (1010.5 KB)

1010.5 KB PNG

>>463336
if this were true, the proportions are 100% fucking fucked for a corporate logo. How does something like this even get approved?

>>463339
>>463293
its vaguely 'jet-ish' - its not science bros

>>463358
>here’s your logo bro
>its “vague”
>that’ll be $100,000 plus tip

>>463442
yes, Barsan Global Logistics seems pretty upset with their vague logo, dont they?

File: s.jpg (21.5 KB)

21.5 KB JPG

>>463443
So upset that they went even more abstract in their next rebrand. Now it's even less jet shaped.

>>463492
What the utter FUCK is it supposed to be?

>>463534
its logistical

File: roman-duszek-lot.jpg (117.6 KB)

117.6 KB JPG

>>463293
logos need to be recognizable, not scientifically accurate representations hey

>nobody can explain what the logo is
>im still just as baffled as i was 3 weeks ago

>>463569
you are saying you don't believe it to be a plane?

>>463293
>>463492
lol the more I look at it the more unsettling it is that I cant figure out what its supposed to be.
I checked their website hoping for some clues but got nothing.

>>463570
see
>>463339
if it's a plane, it appears like it was draw by a blind person who heard stories of such things

>>463902
just like this one doesn't look like a bird, you mean?
>>463539

>>463905
LOT's logo looks like a highly stylized bird. Barsan's logo looks like a blobby, directionless mess without explanation.

File: 2198750-2499344163.jpg (54.3 KB)

54.3 KB JPG

>>463915
>LOT's logo looks like a highly stylized bird.

Not to me; it just looks like a purposefully non specific visual abstraction of the *idea* of "flight", like countless others in the aviation-aerospace field that use stylized wing- and tail- like shapes but aren't trying to represent any real world animal or object.

File: s-l500(1).jpg (77.3 KB)

77.3 KB JPG

>>463917

File: Symbole-NASA.jpg (126 KB)

126 KB JPG

>>463918

File: OIP-1043727871.jpg (11.5 KB)

11.5 KB JPG

>>463919
Pic related began as a highly stylized almost ancient Egyptian hawk symbol and was then made more non specific and mechanical looking in order to better reflect a more high performance aerospace flight direction that is well beyond simply emulating birds but still connects to that.

File: Grumman-Logo-History-2361438531.jpg (366.9 KB)

366.9 KB JPG

>>463920

File: photostudio_1773623362521.jpg (143.7 KB)

143.7 KB JPG

>>463921
the vestiges of the earlier star shape in the lower version's overlapping delta shapes also easily suggest higher performance "flight" in those shapes and suggestion of motion- but aren't birds or airplanes either.

>>463293
Looks like some Wipeout like racing ship

>>463920
This is pretty, get the stealth fighter/bomber vibe out of it. The new NG logo sucks.