>>18319243
Christians can’t explain why they didn’t spare the little boys too

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWC06ylNCGQ

Most "Bible Study" is just rationalizing it.

>>18319243
That would've been one of the reasons, yes. We don't know for sure what happened to each person. We just aren't going to be coomers about it and assume everything is about pussy.

>>18319244
Because males carry the group identity. That's why you take your husband's family (aka collective) name.

>>18319255
the coping begins

>>18319259
Me coping with atheistic coomer fantasies, that is?

>>18319262
and they only """adopted""" the virgins because...?

>>18319255
>Because males carry the group identity
What does that mean in practice? The Nazis had no problem Germanizing Polish boys and girls both. And Modern Judaism is matrilineal. Surely there wouldn’t have been such difficulty integrating young boys into Hebrew society that the preferable alternative was to murder them?

>>18319269
Because they weren't imprinted by males - the carriers of group identity.

>>18319270
>What does that mean in practice?
As per my example, a family name. It denotes a collective, a family identity. And when two families meet to produce a new one, men get to set the identity in that their family name is carried over to the new family and the woman's family name disappears.
>The Nazis had no problem Germanizing Polish boys and girls both
Then I suppose the Nazis had a significantly less symbolic/traditional worldview than a tribe of religious nomads 500BC.
>Modern Judaism is matrilineal
Yes, Jews set themselves as an exception (and even an inversion) of gentile traditions in many ways, some even captured in the Old Testament. But the case at hand is about gentiles, whose identity was always understood to work the old-fashioned patriarchal way.
>Surely there wouldn’t have been such difficulty integrating young boys into Hebrew society
The goal was assimilation, not integration. Which is extremely difficult.

>>18319291
"imprinted" oh okay, you're insane

>>18319291
I believe anon is asking why virgin females only if the motivation isn’t sexual

>>18319243
it's obvious you're not interested in truth, but here it is anyways: https://youtu.be/RdRo2jnpRcU?t=1793

>>18319304
>>18319303
You don't have to agree with the traditional symbolic understanding of identity and its masculine and feminine interactions, but they are fairly straightforward. Men give, women receive.

Midianites were to be killed. If a woman received Midianite identity by knowing a man (a carrier of said identity), she is not fit to live. If she has not received any, she can be assimilated and receive a Hebrew one somewhere down the line. Men, explicit Midianites, were also not fit to live because - Midianites were to be killed.

Wasn't this the exact story where the Midianite hos were intentionally infecting the Israelite men with a plague so bad even the spared young girls were subject to strict quarantine?

(No Christian in human history before internet prn rotted people's brains ever thought these little kids were taken to be sex slaves.)

>>18319317
>Midianites were to be killed.
Such a loving God. he is pure love!

File: 20260129_190156.jpg (640.1 KB)

640.1 KB JPG

>>18319718

Anon, read the post right above you. They weren't very nice people... The women were knowingly engaging in biological warfare, much like modern shitlib women.

>>18319754
>They weren't very nice people...
Then why did the loving all perfect all good god create them? Perhaps he is not so good, hmm?

>>18319715
So why did they kill the little boys too

>>18319715
>>18319754
Cannot tell if you are lying or just stupid. GOD sent the plague to punish the Israelites for having sex with Moabite women. Different people from the Midianites, mind you. While the plague was happening, Phinehas saw an Israelite hanging out with a Midianite woman, killed both of them on sight, then God stopped the plague and commanded the Israelites to go kill more Midianites.

>>18319243
Insane how much numbers 31:17-18 mindbreaks crosstrannies whenever it's posted

>>18319715
>No Christian in human history before internet prn rotted people's brains ever thought these little kids were taken to be sex slaves
It’s not that crazy of a conclusion, anonymous. I also doubt too many pre-porn Christians would have thought too much about it to try to rationalize it as anything other than taking brides. That’s what conquering people did. What’s porn brain rot about that? Why are you fixated on the sexual nature of it? Maybe it was just good old fashioned pillaging.

>>18319785
So you would prefer if God made robots without free will huh. Interesting slave fantasy you have.

>>18320857
Why not autonomous individuals with free will who choose not to commit atrocities?

>>18320857
>>18320873
this is literally what happens to you in heaven btw

>>18319813

Boys grow up to avenge their fathers (and in a pagan culture are just as likely to have whatever plague this was, that only adult sexually-active people were getting on the Jewish side.)

>>18320043

They wouldn't have married kids. That's something Muslims and shitlibs do.

>>18321041
Another case of judeochristian projection

>>18321041
>They wouldn't have married kids
Kek yeah okay

>>18321041
don't look up how old rebecca was when she married issac, worst decision of my life

>>18321146

That's in the Talmud. It's not in the Bible.

The Talmud is basically 4chan furry porn and isn't reliable.

>>18319243
>sheltered suburban white OP doesn't know what ancient warfare was like
read the Homeric epics, that's what you did. kill the enemy and take their stuff including women.

>>18321155
Ah so when God instructs people to take child brides it's "based", got it

>>18321170

They weren't child-brides. They may have intermarried when they grew up? Kids aren't married in the Bible.

>>18319243
dios es puto

>>18320873
People can do that RIGHT NOW.
>but they don't!
Yeah because free will.
>but why aren't they not allowed to choose the bad?
Because then it wouldn't be their choice.
What are you misunderstanding here.

>>18321400
Even if they were child brides, that's not to say they were fucked. Nobles did it in Europe (arranged marriages) and just let the girl mature rather than fuck her because they weren't interested in children. It was like placing her under reserve while they had fun with whores.

File: christian_morals.png (64.4 KB)

64.4 KB PNG

>>18321400
>Kids aren't married in the Bible.
Yes they are, raped kids are punished that way specifically because they are no longer valuable commodities for their fathers once they get used up

>>18319243
If you ever want to know why the Jews control so much of the world's wealth and states, look no further than this thread, which contains a number of gentiles defending through subterfuge and sophistry clear barbarity inflicted by the Jewish nation, not as a mere historical event, but commanded by their lawgiver and enshrined in law as a valid practice by which later belligerents may find themselves in good standing with their sovereign.

>>18319255
Copium

>>18319243
I laughed so fucking hard. Thanks anon.

>>18319715
Do you have any idea how much child rape has happened in human history? Do you seriously think when the romans took millions of gallic children back to rome it was to adopt them? This isnt an 'internet porn rotting the brain' thing, its a you being naive thing. I honestly think you might be a girl yourself because only girls cope about this shit so hard. Like when wiccan girls try to claim grek mythology doesnt matter cause its sexist. Yeah and the greek gods are sexist too retard, even the woman ones like athena

>>18322096

This was back when they had Joshua and Moses to babysit them and were still walking with God- after the exodus (and periodically being cleansed by plagues and fire.)

If post-exile Jesus-less Talmudics had been accused of kidnapping French children to sell to Spanish Muslims in the middle ages I'd believe that. (IYKYK.)

But Joshua if you know anything about him is not going to oversee lolicon. He was a good dude.

>>18319243
The biggest children sex trafficking rings today are of judeochristian management, judeochristianity is inherently genocidal, and pedophilic as seen by noahide laws

File: G.B.Gaulli-Triumph_of_the_Name_of_Jesus (1).jpg (867.8 KB)

867.8 KB JPG

>>18323327

We had such a problem in the south with lynching pedophiles the federal government had to stop it and the Mason lodge that managed the Armenian genocide made a pr group to eulogize one. This one isn't on us.

File: Screenshot 2025-11-18 at 04-05-11 Deuteronomy 21 10-14 GNT - Concerning Women Prisoners of War - Bible Gateway.png (32.3 KB)

32.3 KB PNG

>>18319255
>We just aren't going to be coomers about it and assume everything is about pussy.
There's no reason to assume anything. The bible makes it very clear what happens to captured females. They get married. But even before that, the abuse still happens because they have to check the virginity of the little girls to make sure they don't slaughter the valuable ones with an intact hymen.

File: Screenshot 2026-02-01 at 12-49-08 Strong's Hebrew 802. נָשִׁים (ishshah) -- Woman wife.png (64.1 KB)

64.1 KB PNG

>>18323428
Oh and that translation is just taking into account modern sensibilities because the biblical child rape is too much for normal people to handle, the word literally means female so it includes innocent children too

>>18319317
man apologetics really backs you into some gnarly corners

There's literally nothing saying it was kids. It wouldn't make sense to marry kids. The entire OT is anti-degeneracy to the point of public execution for adulterers and gays. The Jews just push this stuff to get at kids NOW but it wasn't the norm then.

>>18324552
The Greek and Hebrew BOTH SAY OUTRIGHT that these are children.

>>18324552
There's been plenty posted ITT that proves it was kids. The very fucking verse makes it clear when it groups them together with the little boys. And imagine being on the history board and thinking your ick was their ick. Nobody cared that it was children, it was normal to savages

>>18324571

It doesn't say they immediately married them. It wouldn't make sense.

This was before they went bad. We had little kids as slaves in the old South but afaik people usually didn't do anything to them until they were at least past puberty. Little kid slave = immediate sex is literal coombrain and nobody besides dirty-minded talmudists ever thought they did stuff to kids.

>>18319243
(((they))) don't want you to know about the eleventh commandment: thou shall plap cunny

File: Screenshot 2025-07-29 at 02-56-10 Verses 36–38 - Matthew Henry's Commentary - Bible Gateway.png (98.7 KB)

98.7 KB PNG

>>18324578
>It doesn't say they immediately married them. It wouldn't make sense.
The bible makes it clear that rape happens very quickly after capture (1 month after you slaughtered her parents to be exact), and it specifically allows raped children to be forcefully married to the rapist. They had absolutely zero issues with marrying their girls young even in the NT

>>18324578
Do you have autism? It's a sincere question. I've tried to understand this mindset when debating online Christians because only literal child-minded autists act so naively.

>>18324592

This is part of why I hate people no longer reading classic books. You're using an old reference from 1706 and assuming child means a minor rather than someone's progeny.

Adult, marriageable children in the same Anglo-Saxon Christian culture are called "children" by writers like Jane Austen.

>“Mr. Bennet, how can you abuse your own children in such a way? You take delight in vexing me. You have no compassion on my poor nerves.”
https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/1342/pg1342-images.html

It's not talking about marrying literal children you modern degenerate.

>>18324607

It's never a tradition in the Christian West that it's okay to marry kids.

Jews who think three-year-olds are good to go and run a literal child-rape island are importing people who think nine-year-olds are okay while constantly shilling degenerate pedophilia and extreme gendermagic sex ed in every media they control (including this glowfaggot board.) They're trying to get rid of resistance to this stuff by insisting the Biblical tradition says it's okay.

Everyone pushing this stuff should be executed.

>>18324612
What does taph mean?

File: 7yo.png (538.8 KB)

538.8 KB PNG

>>18324612
>child doesn't actually mean child bro
>pretends that somehow the age of consent in those cultures wasn't extremely low
you're coping, do you know what those certain numbers of years are?
>that is, one that is arrived to years of maturity, is ripe for marriage, and is what the Jewish doctors call (trgb) ; who, according to them, was one of twelve years and a half old F20, at which age virgins were judged fit to marry: hence that saying of theirs F21 - https://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/gills-exposition-of-the-bible/1-corinthians-7-36.html

>>18324623

He's quoting a British book from centuries ago. It's written in English. You're just retarded.

>>18324628

For teenagers who got pregnant and are already having sex (usually with someone the same age.) It's called a "shotgun wedding" and prevents the dude from skipping town with the girl's future ruined. It's very rare and isn't the same.

>>18324623
And no it's not tradition or normal in the Middle East to be pedos or do child marriage. Look at age of consent map for MENA cunts, it's all 15 minimum and often 18. Only Gulf Arabs are into pedo shit.

>>18324628
There are four states that allow child marriage with parental consent, these are California, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Mississippi. Two Democrat and two Republican states.

File: mary.png (995.4 KB)

995.4 KB PNG

>>18324627
Yes and the anglos themselves had an extremely low aoc as I have shown so your argument has nothing to stand on. You aren't addressing anything. I can show you even Christian saints and church fathers who say it's around that age
>>18324633
except it is, see pic especially in the past. also lmao ksa set it at 18 as well but all of this is modern

File: ab67616d0000b273ddeff73624185bfc1531495d.jpg (77.4 KB)

77.4 KB JPG

>>18324633
here we go. no age of consent in Saudi Arabia as long as you're married.

>>18324650
"Any kind of sexual activity outside marriage is illegal in Saudi Arabia. In 2019, Saudi Arabia officially banned all marriages under the age of 18 for both men and women.[117] The Saudi Shura Council had outlawed marriages under the age of 15, and required court approval for those under 18.[118] In accordance with the Child Protection Law, the law has a provision that states "Before the conclusion of the marriage contract, it is necessary to ensure that a person marrying under the age of 18 will not be harmed, whether male or female."[119]"

>>18324650
>You have to be 20 to get married in Tunisia
Grim. No wonder their women are such massive feminist whores.

>>18319247
Desperate rationalizations and copes have been standard Abrahamic practice for centuries now.

>>18324638

> according to rabbinic texts
> according to rabbinic texts
> according to rabbinic texts

These were written by the Pharisees after the crucified Jesus Christ and are full of things vile enough that illustrating them would probably get someone arrested. We can't trust most of it.

>>18324939
So you're just going to ignore the archaeological evidence? Why would this get anyone arrested when these laws didn't even exist when that was written anyway?

>>18324944

I'm talking about now. They were perverts. Their stuff is some of the worst stuff I've ever read.

Even if 12yo did on occasion that's still not the little kids the elites and the rest of the talmud are pushing. Have you read it? It has stuff with toddlers. And it's hugely, hugely contradictory to the actual Bible and even basic biology. I've read the Babylonian Talmud hour after hour and cannot stress to you enough how unreliable it is.

>>18324952
>I'm talking about now.
Okay but that's irrelevant. Those things were written long ago way before this became law. So they couldn't have written anything that was against social norms if they wanted to paint Jesus in a bad light. Furthermore Christians themselves transmitted these traditions and accepted them in their churches.
>Even if 12yo did on occasion
It's a fact according to the actual physical evidence found on the tombs and the marriage contracts that survived that this was not simply "on occasion" It was the norm for Jesus' people

>>18324966
Why are you arguing with superstitious retards? Honestly. Just take a deep breath, step away from the computer, and ask yourself.
>Does this person sound rational?
>Is this person suffering from some kind of mental illness?
>How will arguing with them about a clearly evident crime against humanity fix the bigger problem, which is that they are a superstitious retard?
I promise you, answer those three questions and you'll realize this is all for nothing.

>>18324966

Hold up.


I think we may defining kids differently.

While the 12y.o. thing is gross when I hear of Jews with kids I think of the many talmudic verses describing how to rape babies under three (and sometimes boys under nine by use of wild animals.)

>>18319244
Not Christian, but the answer is that they can't rape the little boys to make pregnant little boys.

>>18324978

Rel (and why I'm pretty sure the rabbis the Christian British guy consulted censored):

The Master said in a baraita: If his children and the members of his household were minors, even though they are unclothed, it is permitted to recite Shema even without a garment separating between them. The Gemara asks: Until what age is one still considered a minor? Rav Ḥisda said: A girl until she is three years and one day old, and a boy until he is nine years and one day old, for these are the ages from which a sexual act in which they participate is considered a sexual act. Some say: A girl eleven years and one day old and a boy of twelve years and one day old, as that is the age at which they are considered adults in this regard. This age is only approximate, as the age of majority for both this, the boy, and that, the girl, is at the onset of puberty in accordance with the verse: “Your breasts were formed and your hair was grown” (Ezekiel 16:7).
https://www.sefaria.org/Berakhot.24a.12?ven=english|William_Davidson_Edition_-_English&lang=bi

It used to be twelve maybe but like now it's around three. (Other verses say it's okay for under-threes.)

>>18321038
>Boys grow up to avenge their fathers
So you're advocating for child murder? average christian

>>18325530
Preventing blood feuds is virtuous.

>>18325547
>Preventing blood feuds
by murdering children

>>18325577
Worked though, didn’t it? Plus any survivors would have to contend with the women who are now pair bonded with their Israelite husbands.

>>18325595
Murdering children is evil.

>>18319243
You're a woman aren't you?

>>18325595
Why not just kill everyone on earth then? They no one will ever sin or feud with each other ever again. The ends don't always justify the means.

>>18325530
>>18325577
>>18325598
>they violated the Geneva convention!!!
God tells me to vanquish my enemies.
>>18325615
>Why not just kill everyone on earth then?
He literally did. Reminder "genocoide" is a word invented by a jew in the 1940's. No matter how strong your secular rules-based order may appear to you, God is not bound to it.

>>18325622
>Reminder "genocoide" is a word invented by a jew in the 1940's
So is white genocide not real then? If what you say is true Jews have every right to exterminate you.

>>18325615
If the end is obeying God then the means are commanded by a prophet then it is acceptable. Laws are good to prevent feuds, but Moses was not going to be enforcing Torah in Midian so he needed to solve the problem quickly. Kill the men, boys, and defiled women and pair bond with the little girls. Your inability to understand this is caused by your poor intellect, but it’s quite logical.

>>18325639
I'm not arguing it isn't logical, I'm saying it's barbaric and beneath civilized people.

>>18325642
The Torah created Western civilization, it is God’s word. There’s nothing uncivilized or barbaric about it. If Moses had let the Midianite boys live it would have endangered Christ’s bloodline.

>>18325642
God is gonna expose your filth and show the entire universe how vile and uncivilized you are. Every single one of your evil thought and desires, fantasies and opinions of others. Every single thing you have done in secret, every betrayal, every humiliation, every gossip you spread, every person you mocked, everything.

Yet he will be proven to be splendorous and pristine, with not a single gram of malice or evil in his heart.

If you think you're better than the one who created the human eye or the blazing sun in the sky then you're an bigger fool than every other person on earth combined.

>>18325645
>The Torah created Western civilization,
The torah had literally nothing to do with the ancient meds/greco roman civilization
>>18325657
>Every single one of your evil thought and desires
You're the one who fantasizes about murdering people you think are evil.
>>18325658
strongest automatically means morally superior to you because your intelligence is on the same level as the bronze age jewish cave men who created your repulsive religion.

>>18325637
It is a temporal matter is what I mean. There is no inherent moral framework against a race of people being replaced/exterminated. It is of course a negative experience for the race itself which it will resist if it has a sense of self-preservation but again, that is all earthly matters, not spiritual.

Reminder that there are NO theological arguments against child marriage. It's not sinful.

>>18325659
So you're more intelligent than the designer of the human eye? What can you show for it? God has the entire universe in his resume.

>>18325659
The Spartans are descended from Abraham and the Romans are the sons of Esau.

>>18325675
Correct, and the official Catholic position against incest partains to human social dynamics as well, not theology. So?

>>18325698
If they were there would be evidence of them performing circumcision.

>>18325695
>So you're more intelligent than the designer of the human eye?
Never said that. I am more moral, though.

>>18325713
They forgot.

I do sincerely appreciate the Christians in this thread have, after much cajoling, moved onto the much more honest and coherent position of "If God said the kids had to die then they had to die", rather than the beyond retarded "u-um actually it never says they were raping their virgin slaves, you're a coomer for thinking they did".

>>18325734
Those posts are probably Jews/Muslims trying to make Christians look bad. They adopted the little girls as their own daughters, nothing more than that. If they got married it was when they were adults. The Lord Jesus would never command something as disgusting and pornographic as child sex slavery.

>>18325751
>The Lord Jesus would never command something as disgusting and pornographic as child sex slavery.
Correct, he would however command his people to vanquish their enemies, as is also unambiguously stated in 1 Samuel 15:3

>>18325751
>Those posts are probably Jews/Muslims trying to make Christians look bad
Numbers is in the OT, retard. It's literally the Hebrew bible.

>>18325757
That was Satan, not Jesus.

>>18325760
I don't see the verses saying to take little girls as sex slaves in my Bible. In fact, it seems to imply in the footnotes that they would have been adopted as daughters. You can check the NRSV yourself.

>>18325766
The point is that it's a book the jews follow as well, why would they implicate themselves to make Christians look bad?

>>18325775
They know the real meaning and cannot be deceived, but they want gentiles to abandon Christ even if it means making God look bad.

The Bible has an entire passage that says if a virgin woman gets raped in town, it's her fault, because clearly, she didn't scream loud enough, so she must also be put to death

If a man rapes a woman who isn't a virgin, and they get caught, he just has to pay her dad a fine and they get married

>>18325764
Jesus claimed the OT is infallible. In the book, Samuel clearly states - "this is what the Lord Almighty says" before laying out his genocidal decree.

>>18319718
He is pure love indeed. How that reflects on survival of semitic savage tribes is a different matter.

>>18323433
I'm not really backed into anything, I'm just pointing out the paradigm from which Hebrew understanding operates.

>>18325790
That's somewhat close but sadly mistaken.

>>18325734
Don't get us wrong, you absolutely are a coomer for thinking spared girls are automatically for sex.

File: 77.jpg (53.6 KB)

53.6 KB JPG

>The Israelites took the women of Midian and their little ones captive; and they took all their cattle, their flocks, and all their goods as booty. All their towns where they had settled, and all their encampments, they burned, but they took all the spoil and all the booty, both people and animals. Then they brought the captives and the booty and the spoil to Moses, to Eleazar the priest, and to the congregation of the Israelites, at the camp on the plains of Moab by the Jordan at Jericho.

>Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the congregation went to meet them outside the camp. Moses became angry with the officers of the army, the commanders of thousands and the commanders of hundreds, who had come from service in the war. Moses said to them, “Have you allowed all the women to live? These women here, on Balaam’s advice, made the Israelites act treacherously against the Lord in the affair of Peor, so that the plague came among the congregation of the Lord. Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man by sleeping with him. But all the young girls who have not known a man by sleeping with him, keep alive for yourselves.

>>18325790
Imagine fucking some beak nosed Israelite bitch so hard your prostate pulsates and throbs so hard to get every little drop of semen out with your sperm to get her pregnant. Your asshole aches from the intensity of it all and you feel a void where your prostate is because, again, there's not a DROP left. She keeps her mouth shut during the whole encounter, little moans slipping out here and there, you moan a little bit and let out a loud grunt when you finish. You pant on top of her, both of you completely naked, in utter bliss with a feeling of love, when all of a sudden you feel a thumb go up your asshole. Her father found you and he's pissed off. "You have defiled my daughter!" he says, "and now you must die!" You look at your lover whose eyes have become like two large saucers, engulfed with fear. "Abba, I was raped!" she replies. But he does not believe her. He was watching from the window and could see her rub your arms up and down during the act, her kissing your chest before and after, and the moans, oh God, the moans. But no screaming for help. Even he got a little aroused during the act. So he and his sons grab you and the girl and drag you out to the town square. The resident Levite comes out, requests witnesses, hears the testimony and sentences you to death. As the crowd throws rocks at your head you start to feel numb and slip away into unconsciousness. This is the end of your life, all for some Jew pussy, but was it worth it? Yes.

>>18325764
Jesus can't save you from God, but God can save you from Jesus.

>>18325790
They also had a law that said if a guy marries a woman, accuses a woman of not being a virgin, her parents need to provide "proof" that she is one (I'm guessing bloody bedsheets from the wedding night or something) and if they can't, she's stoned to death. If the guy lied, he is charged a fine. Needless to say this is a clearly retarded law but God made it up so it can't be wrong, right?

File: 1700588848262560.jpg (23.5 KB)

23.5 KB JPG

Hot question: If atheists believe we're just meat bags controlled by electrical signals, then how is keeping a harem of loli brides immoral?

File: IMG_6639.jpg (117 KB)

117 KB JPG

>>18319243
Christians have always practiced human sacrifice, we just don’t label them as sacrifices because we tend to view them from the Christian narrative.

Every person killed in the Spanish Inquisition was a human sacrifice. Every person killed in witch trials were human sacrifices. Every person killed for heresy and apostasy were human sacrifices. Every Catholic priest killed by Protestants was a human sacrifice, as was every Protestant preacher killed by Catholics. Every pagan killed for their beliefs was a human sacrifice. Everyone slaughtered in the crusades were human sacrifices.

They were all killed to satiate the Christian god. That’s precisely what religious human sacrifice is.

>>18325844
>every killing is a sacrifice if you cope hard enough

>>18325848
I’m sorry it hurt your feelings, but it’s absolutely true.

There’s little difference in the Aztecs sacrificing humans to bring a good harvest, and Christian mobs massacring Jews to end the Black Plague, or burning witches to please god. The Bible directly demands the sacrifice of witches. Exodus 22:18 “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.”

Christians have been practicing human sacrifice for as long as Christianity has had a name.

>>18325850
If you can't tell the difference between a ritualized sacrifice to the gods and executing a criminal then I will leave you entirely to it. Just don't lie to yourself - your posts have zero convincing power, you're really just venting creatively.

>>18325853
Straw man. I never argued that every killing is a human sacrifice. Are you intentionally misrepresenting my point? Because you’ve intentionally ignored all 9 examples I’ve given you and replaced them with examples that I never claimed to be relevant.

I said that anyone killed to satiate a god is a human sacrifice, not that anyone who is killed is a human sacrifice. I specifically used the phrase “religious human sacrifice”. If someone is murdered in order to please a deity, that is human sacrifice.

Were the Holocaust and Holodomor carried out to please a deity? No. So I wouldn’t classify those murders as human sacrifice.

Was the Spanish Inquisition carried out to please a deity? Yes. So I would classify those murders as human sacrifice

Were the Crusades carried out to please a deity? Yes. So I would classify those murders as human sacrifice.

Were witch burnings carried out to please a deity? Yes. So I would classify those murders as human sacrifice.

What if God was one of us
Just a slob like one of us
Just a stranger on the bus
Tryin' to make His way home?
If God had a face, what would it look like?

And would you want to see
If seeing meant that you would have to believe
In things like Heaven and in Jesus and the saints
And all the prophets?

>>18325751
If God told you to rape a child, would it be wrong to do so?

>>18325854
>I said that anyone killed to satiate a god is a human sacrifice
Then went on to list thousands of deaths never meant to "satiate a god". I know.

>>18325854
>Were the Holocaust and Holodomor carried out to please a deity? No. So I wouldn’t classify those murders as human sacrifice.
You can if you consider Hitler/Stalin a god his followers had to appease.

>>18325854
>Were witch burnings carried out to please a deity? Yes.
Source? they were officially criminals, nigga.

>>18325854
The main problem is that you think humans are way more important than they actually are. If only you knew you sinners are bought, sold and trafficked like cattle by demons and spirits and you don't even notice it. Many of us are in spiritual chains and have been enslaved because of our sins. Most people aren't even considered human (Man) by the heavens but animals who go all day after their animalistic instincts and refuse to change.

>>18325860
>If God told you to rape a child
But he didn't.

>>18325876
You're fucking insane. If your god allows for demons to enslave you and sell you like cattle then your god is a DEMON!

>>18325877
Can Christians not answer hypotheticals?

>>18325881
You are not making a lot of sense. You said, if you God told you to rape a child, would you do it? But God hasn't asked me to do that.

>>18325886
I didn't ask you if you would do it, I asked would it be wrong to do it. Killing children is, according to this thread, not wrong if God tells you to. Would it be wrong if he told you to rape a child?

Why virgins though?

>>18325881
What would you do if gravity pushed things up instead of down? Some hypotheticals are so uninsightful they don't really require an answer. God is a perfect moral agent in Christianity, so you have basically asked "what would you do if rape was moral"? No insight can be derived from this question, only moral cringe. If that's what you're after, the anon will do best by disengaging.

>>18325891
You keep saying, if he would command such a thing. But he hasn't.

>>18325880
You buy and sell dogs and cats and pigs and chicken and cows, you are just half a step more intelligent than them. Spirits are light-years more civilized and superior to us. They have more right to own a human than humans have to own dogs, yet I bet you do not object to the human ownership of dogs.

How many chicken wings did you stuff into your piehole this week? Did you had any regard for the chickens? What moral high ground could you possibly have?

If you want to be respected and treated like a human then you have to be righteous.

>>18325895
That’s not the point, do you know what a hypothetical is? The point is if God did ask you to do it, would you do it because God said so?

>>18325894
>so you have basically asked "what would you do if rape was moral"?
I am again not asking what you would do, I am asking if doing so would be moral. This response makes it seem like you are saying it would in fact be moral to rape a child if God commanded you to do so?
>>18325895
Yeah Anon that's what a hypothetical is.

>>18325903
That's great and all, but he hasn't asked me to do it. So why bother answering this question?
>>18325902
But he hasn't asked me to do it! Why can't you understand?

>>18325903
>>so you have basically asked "what would you do if rape was moral"?
>I am again not asking what you would do, I am asking if doing so would be moral.
Like I just explained - God is the arbiter of morality, so you have just asked "if rape were moral, would it be moral?" No insight is gained by your question, Anon. All you gained is outrage over a tautology.

>>18325908
Do you know what a hypothetical is? The question is simple, if he asked you to do it would you do it? The answer is a simple yes or no.

All the chronological continuity in the bible was added later lol
It's a mishmash of unrelated Semitic legends, most of which had nothing to do with each other, that later authors forced into a coherent narrative
It's the equivalent of the Song of the Nibelings for Germanics, a bunch of myths and historical events conflated into one thing by a semi-literate society which can't dispute it because of said semi-literacy. No one can call you out for bullshitting or ripping off other stories because they don't have any other sources. Nobody is writing comprehensive histories, its just oral tradition of bards who have every incentive to lie and make shit up.
The modern equivalent would be some insane fanfiction where Harry Potter blows up the Death Star then teams up with General Patton to rescue his sister Jackie Kennedy from Adolf Hitler (leader of the Taliban) and the dragon Skynet.
Now imagine a worldwide apocalypse occurs, all records are lost except for this one psychotic fanfiction. Any society that came after that would have no way to dispute it, they'd treat it as a genuine historical text.

>>18325915
It's like saying, does your mother know you are gay? Yes or no? The answer is, I'm not gay, so it's neither! Maybe you would say yes, but I cannot make a judgment from your posts alone. God hasn't asked me to do such a thing, so it's neither.

>>18325908
Well one reason would be to engage honestly in the discussion but I don't think that is a particularly moving reason for you. Another would be to test the edges of "If God says so it is good". Killing children is good when God commands it, if he commanded something else generally thought of as bad, would it still be good?
>>18325911
"Yes" would have been a faster and less pedantic answer to my question. I am genuinely asking, would you be this pedantic if someone outside of an internet argument asked you "Is it moral to kill a man who has sex with another man, as the Bible commands us to"?
>>18325917
No, it would be like saying "If you were gay, how would your mother react?" "I don't know" might be an answer here, if you genuinely don't know how your mother would react, but "well I'm not gay" is the answer of someone who doesn't know how to answer a hypothetical.

>>18325924
Again, you're saying would God command something bad? No. Because God is good. You are trying to ask whether or not a circle can also be a square. It's just nonsensical.

You keep asking me if I would harm a child if God commanded it, and I keep telling you. But he hasn't. Get it through your thick skull.

>>18325924
>"Yes" would have been a faster and less pedantic
And equally unproductive due to the question being tautological and uninsightful by design.
> would you be this pedantic if someone outside of an internet argument asked you "Is it moral to kill a man who has sex with another man, as the Bible commands us to"?
I would, because the Bible doesn't command us (me and you) to do this. It commanded ancient Hebrews to do this. But at least this question has a potential to extract an insight. Your original one didn't. It's important to me that you understand that you spent 4 posts demanding an answer for nothing no matter which one you got.

File: 4544454444444.gif (457.6 KB)

457.6 KB GIF

Yes, OP, that's how ancient warfare worked. It's how warfare works in any era. Women get the hots for the invading army and demand to fuck them. You may notice that women have no real loyalty to anything except the nearest Chad Thundercock.

>>18325927
I am again not asking if you would personally do anything.
>would God command something bad? No. Because God is good.
From the perspective of most people, he has commanded "something bad" many times. Most people consider killing children bad, but God commands it in the Bible more than once. Most people today think slavery is bad, God's okay with it. Most people, even people who don't like homosexuals, think killing a man for having sex with another man is bad, but it's right there in the text. You are defining "bad" based on what you consider bad, but if God decides otherwise, are you wrong?
>>18325938
I mean I got an answer right away. I think it is illuminating if unsurprising that when you ask Christians questions like this they hem and haw and pretend they don't know what hypotheticals are rather than just saying yes or no.

>>18319243
Regardless of what they did with the girls, this is clearly a genocidal act.

>>18325949
Is it a law? Then I will do it. But you are asking me about something which is neither a law nor has been commanded. So again, there's no answer to this as much as you want one.

>>18325950
>i-it violated the heckin' geneva convention
womp womp

>>18325949
> they hem and haw and pretend they don't know what hypotheticals are
>...I got an answer right away
Huh?
>I think it is illuminating
Please do expand, what insight did you derive from "if rape were moral, it would be moral"?

>>18325949
>Hey doctor, most people consider mutilation to be wrong so do not cut me open and fix my insides.

If killing children that will grow up to be evil saves the lives of many other people who would have become their victims in the future and you in your ignorance would staunchly opposite them killing these kids then you would be the evil one and the one causing innocents to suffer on earth.

Maybe if people killed the homosexuals in New York and San Francisco in the 80s who were having daily orgies in bathhouses then AIDS would not exist. Shit, most STDs would have been eradicated or fairly controlled. But gays signelhandely are keeping all STDs alive and spreading and have the highest rates of infections and reinfections of any other group.

You are not wiser than the Most High, you're not even in the top 1 billion of most intelligent beings on earth, let alone the heavens. If he tells you to do something, whatever it is, it is the wisest thing to do it.

>>18325952
I don't know what law has to do with this. We allow gay marriage in most developed countries even though God says it is wrong. Surely you can reason about the morality of something regardless of its legal status.
>>18325958
I think refusing to answer the question directly is an answer on its own. When the answer to "Is murdering children wrong?" is a direct "God tells me to vanquish my enemies"(>>18325622) but the answer to "what if God told you to rape a child?" is "u-uh but he didn't and he wouldn't and besides that doesn't even make any sense" it shows a hesitance from Christians to reckon with the idea of God commanding them to do something they find distasteful even in hypothetical.
>>18325962
>If he tells you to do something, whatever it is, it is the wisest thing to do it.
Just clarifying, it would be wise to rape a child if God told you to?

>>18325988
>I don't know what law has to do with this. We allow gay marriage in most developed countries even though God says it is wrong. Surely you can reason about the morality of something regardless of its legal status.
Those are not real laws since God did not sanction them.

>>18325988
>it shows a hesitance
>about something they find distasteful
Quite an insight.

>>18325990
>Those are not real laws since God did not sanction them.
>>18325952
>Is it a law? Then I will do it.
Anon what are you talking about

>>18326000
God has a set of laws that he enjoins upon believers. You cannot legalize gay marriage, but it is always legal to punish sodomites.

>>18320873
That's exactly what God did
Do you choose to commit atrocities? I don't

>>18319243
Even the Christian apologia sites just say
> the old testament can be tricky to understand
When tackling blatant jewish psychopathy like this.

Why do you think theres so many Apocalypse books in the Bible?
Jews were a weak, grudge holding people. The Bible is litteraly a jewcel cope book wishing for a vindication in the future

>>18326011
Well, they've gotten it... Billions dead, two massive world religions, control of most of the world's money supply and industries, control of the media, at the forefront of every significant political ideology of modernity, able to defeat the entire Middle East from a small strip of land. If anything, the Jews were right and maybe they shouldn't have been underestimated.

>>18326003
So would it be legal to rape a child if God commanded you to?

File: Ashkenazi heat map.jpg (139.1 KB)

139.1 KB JPG

>>18326011
>>18326018
Modern Jews are frauds and not the people of the Bible, which were the ancestors of Palestinian Arabs.

>>18326030
But God didn’t command me to and he didn’t make it a law.

>>18326031
so then what happened in gaza is a good thing

>>18326031
Palis aren't them either, they're Bedouin squatters who moved in after the Roman revolts. The original Judean stock was mostly all killed in those. If you will read the Bible the Israelites come off as typical kill all the infidels sand nigs and not at all shifty le merchant types. However if you interact with terroni you will quickly realize that they're the same race as Ashkenazi Jews, different religion. Same behaviors, aesthetic sense, types of professions they're drawn to, etc.

>>18326095
>If you will read the Bible the Israelites come off as typical kill all the infidels sand nigs
They literally called Cyrus a Messiah.

>>18319243
>another Pakizutt Bro thread

>>18326079
He commanded it and made it law though

>>18325988
>Just clarifying, it would be wise to rape a child if God told you to?
Yes. If for whatever reason God tells me to rape a child then I would do it.

>>18326011
>Even the Christian apologia sites just say
>> the old testament can be tricky to understand
so in other words they admit it's fucked up?

>>18319243
>NOOOO THATS NOT HECKIN LIBERAL WHOLESOME CHUNGUS
don’t care.
>but Christianity isn’t liberal
1, this is Judaism
2, we aren’t liberal
3, sex with little girls is fine if you marry them and adopt them into the tribe and they racially similar enough to not dilute you, they can also serve as helpers.

>>18319269
Non virgins won’t adapt well because they will always think of their first time.
If I enslave a virgin qt and deflower her I can marry her and she will think only of me.
What’s actually wrong with this? We are animals no? This is what a thinking animal does, why shouldn’t we act in our best interest?
>>18319303
>your first time isn’t special
Virgin detected.
>>18319304
It is sexual but it’s more than sexual. The sexual aspect of women defines them. If they are virgins they can assimilate and get married. If thy aren’t they will always identify with their first partner.
This is just how women behave.
>I disagree
Ok but for the sake of argument assume this is how women actually behave, the reasoning is sound right?

>>18319718
More blood has been spilled for the sake of love than anything else.

>>18325988
>would you rape a child if God told you to
Yes. And it would be extremely evil if I was deceived or schizophrenic.

>>18327111
It's because christians don't truly like or believe in God, they only like the fake sugarcoated version of God they made up in their own mind. If they could erase the old testament and pretend it didn't exist they would. They don't like God. They disagree with his laws and commandments and decrees. They hate his chosen people.

>>18327342
funny you should say that, Shmuel, because rabbinic Judaism had long devised many loopholes and explanations for why the Mosaic law didn't necessarily apply literally to the modern world.

>>18327349
Well Vatican 2 is basically the same thing

>>18327349
I don't give two fucks about rabbinic Judaism.

>>18327200
>If I enslave a virgin qt and deflower her I can marry her and she will think only of me.
Over 100 posts in this thread insisting it isn't about raping virgin girls before Anon comes in and admits "yes it is and that's a good thing, I love slavery". I appreciate your honesty but I'm not sure you understand what is being argued here.

Why do y'all keep saying it isn't about raping virgin girls? Moses flat out says that according to God, yes, you are allowed to take captives from war as your wives, and their consent doesn't matter.

Deuteronomy 21:10-14
>When you go out to war against your enemies, and the Lord your God hands them over to you and you take them captive, suppose you see among the captives a beautiful woman whom you desire and want to marry, and so you bring her home to your house: she shall shave her head, pare her nails, discard her captive’s garb, and shall remain in your house a full month, mourning for her father and mother; after that you may go in to her and be her husband, and she shall be your wife. But if you are not satisfied with her, you shall let her go free and not sell her for money. You must not treat her as a slave, since you have dishonored her.

>>18327456
A wife is ones property, you cannot rape your wife.

>>18327415
>he didn't realize he's being mocked

>>18327456
>it says "wife"
>obviously meaning "rape"

>>18327497
No sex outside marriage is literally Catholic sexual morality but okay

>>18327497
Adultery is a sin.

>>18327456

Arranged marriages were the norm throughout all of human history.

Old Testament rules give the girl time to know the guy (to prohibit lust), demand she be de-prettied with a haircut and no fancy nails before the wedding (to prohibit lust) then let her go wherever she wants if it doesn't work out.

This is more rights than a married imperial princess had in Japan during their cultural height centuries ago, and a lot of the shenanigans from the court that produced Tale of Genji wouldn't have happened if they had the Torah.

>>18319255
>I should be able to kill children because of uhhh group identity o algo
this is the "objective morality" that christcucks keep saying we need so that society doesn't fall apart

>>18328031
Imagine how tight those Midianite girls were. I would’ve been so excited hearing Moses give the order. God rewards the faithful.

Chuds will defend child murder and child marriage to own the libs

>>18328214
It's not to 'owns the libs'

We are honoring God. The actual God who revealed Himself to us. You are the one who follows his own lusts. You are probably a homosexual who does drugs.

>>18328221
>It's not to 'owns the libs'
>We are honoring God.

>>18328221
Christians think two adult men in a consensual relationship is morally worse than a 50 year old man marrying a 6 year old girl…

>>18328253
The first one was condemned by God in the bible yes. What is your moral standard?

>>18328253
If you kill all men who have sex with men the rates of STDs globally would drop by like 80%. Yet they are like 5% of the population. Clearly God was right.

>>18328221
>The actual God who revealed Himself to us
God doesn't exist, the entire Bible is fanfic.
Cope