Thread #18326097 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (173.6 KB)
173.6 KB JPG
How certain is the sexual nature of Muhammad's nightime outing in the desert as witnessed and recorded by Abd Allah ibn Mas'ud?
9 RepliesView Thread
>>
File: Tricked by Lover jinn.jpg (66.8 KB)
66.8 KB JPG
>>18326097
This isn't something unusual it's an Islamic tradition to get zutted by Lover genies.
>>
>>
>>
>>18326826
All hadiths are fake and gay but this one in particular is relatively harmless and speak of the Prophet praying alongside zutt like genderless beings (most likely Djinns), there's nothing sexual about it
The fact perverted freak judeochristians interpret it as homosexual intercourse speaks more of their sick little minds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>18326097
I imagine at the time, in the tribal pre-Islamic middle east, a male winding up with a dick in your ass at some point was more of a simple fact of life than a major sin.
Sure, it did have a stigma of weakness and no one was probably proud of the fact that they got buggered by an older relative, mentor, or rival tribesman... but most of them just dusted themselves off and went on with their lives.
Of course, when Abrahamic religion took over, it was seen as a major evil and catamites should/would be put to death.
But from Greece, to Rome, to the Levant. There seemed to be a cycle of someone puts in up your ass, and then you put in other people's asses as you get older and attain a higher position in society. I'm not condoning it, it's a terrible thing, but the old world was operating with very different sexual norms.
I think the passage, whether true or not, is intending to tell people that just because you were forced to be another man's bitch at some point (against your will) doesn't mean you're unfit to become a pious. Of course, the Islamic culture came to absolutely abhor homosexuality and particularly catamites, but I think it was a different thing in the early days.