Thread #18327481 | Image & Video Expansion | Click to Play
File: IMG_1382.png (20.8 KB)
20.8 KB PNG
Discuss the history of National Socialism
18 RepliesView Thread
>>
File: Screenshot_20251003-082735.png (992.5 KB)
992.5 KB PNG
>>18327481
Lend lease, Hitler and black cock are the holy trinity of his
>>
File: IMG_1383.png (369.5 KB)
369.5 KB PNG
Hitler was a Jew, here’s proof:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stennes_revolt
>Stennes argued that National Socialism had been betrayed: the revolution was meant to destroy elites and big capital, not ally with them. He demanded real socialism—expropriation of financiers and industrialists, rule by the SA as a people’s army, and a revolution carried out from below rather than negotiated with conservative power.
>Hitler rejected real socialism and deliberately aligned the Nazi movement with industrialists, financiers, and conservative elites. He protected big business, crushed anti-capitalist factions, and disciplined the SA in order to win elite backing, pursue power legally, and build a hierarchical state serving capital under absolute Führer control.
TL;DR: Hitler betrayed National Socialism and was a stooge for rich capitalist jews.
>>
>>18327481
Though they often unjustly targeted innocent people that really weren’t a threat at all, I’m willing to admit that this was the only ideology that was willing to destroy communism at its source without any half-measures. The Western Democracies just waited until the Soviets collapsed on their own and allowed far-left parties to continue to exist within their countries as can be seen today. Marxism can only be dealt with through total war.
>>
File: 1761758056172.jpg (71.2 KB)
71.2 KB JPG
>>18327481
Lost to Slavic Bolshevism
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Hitler is ACKSHULLY a capitalist Jew
>Hitler is ACKSHULLY a communist
Why do anti-Hitlerites always come across as retarded and conspiratorial? Meanwhile National Socialists always come across as intelligent and well reasoned in their arguments
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
The Nazis nationalized many ´businesses.
This (the taking of a business by their original owner and giving it to a loyal member of the party [effectively an agent of the government] who follows the party policy) is called "privatization" by modern historians.